User talk:Tinywings10

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! jheiv ^{talk contribs} 00:40, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Hello Tinywings10. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article William Morris Endeavor, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 17:56, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, I'm Go Phightins!. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Go Phightins! (talk) 02:02, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of William Morris Endeavor clients

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of William Morris Endeavor clients, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm Jauerback. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Ari Emanuel without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 18:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Patrick Whitesell, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 21:57, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Patrick Whitesell, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 00:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Patrick Whitesell. SQGibbon (talk) 15:45, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Patrick Whitesell. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. SQGibbon (talk) 19:25, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vocativ

Please do not delete sourced content on Wikipedia, as you have done on the Vocativ page. If you have a reason to do so, please discuss it direclty on the talk page. Usterday (talk) 21:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vocativ

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Usterday (talk) 14:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create pages or add content that attacks, threatens, or disparages their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Usterday (talk) 14:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Patrick Whitesell. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. SQGibbon (talk) 14:29, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Whitesell

Hello, you asked in your summary how you can make the change to Patrick Whitesell's birthday permanent. It's actually quite easy, provide a reliable source. Find a reliable source that anyone can verify (ie, not something based on personal knowledge), add it to your edit and then it's done. One extra problem, though, is that there is already a reliable source in the article that claims a different date than you are. So it would be very helpful if you tell us why that other source is unreliable in this instance. SQGibbon (talk) 14:28, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Tinywings10! I know the you are well-meaning but you have to stop this. You cannot change his date of birth until you have a reliable source (according to Wikipedia's standards) that accurately states his birthday. We can't just take your word for it. Sorry about that. :-( Intermittentgardener (talk) 14:00, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Read the article. It clearly says that his birthday PARTY was on February 21. There is no mention of his actual birthday. Call his office and confirm his birthday if you are questioning it. Your sources are wrong, but there is no source with the correct date. Do your due diligence and accept my edit.

I am trying to help you. Getting angry will not solve anything. Wikipedia has an absolutely ironclad rule on this topic. Only information from published sources with a reputation for reliable fact-checking are acceptable. This rule is in place to ensure that the topics covered in Wikipedia are notable and that citations can be fact-checked by the community. I will go back and read through the article. If what you say is true, and the same "fact" is not in any other sources cited, then I will just omit mention of his birthday. That way, there will at lest no be an inaccuracy in the article. In order to get the date that you want in for his birthday, we need some kind of published source that can be verified. Calling his office will not work. It seems that you are affiliated with either Mr. Whitesell or William Morris. If that is the case just issue a press release about his real birthday and how Wikipedia is getting it wrong. Then I would be willing to change the date for you. Work with me, okay? :-)Intermittentgardener (talk) 16:28, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kris-Jenner-Little-Black-Dress-lovebscott-red-carpet.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Kris-Jenner-Little-Black-Dress-lovebscott-red-carpet.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 19:30, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Kris Jenner Genlux Event Beverly Hills.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Kris Jenner Genlux Event Beverly Hills.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:34, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kris Jenner Genlux Event Beverly Hills.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Kris Jenner Genlux Event Beverly Hills.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 20:36, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to upload media files with false or lacking copyright and source information, as you did at File:Kris Jenner Genlux Event Beverly Hills.jpg, you may be blocked from editing. Please make sure you have read and understood our image use policy before making any further uploads. If you have questions, ask at the copyright question page. Eeekster (talk) 20:37, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated copyright violations despite ample warnings as well as the continued addition of unsourced personal information to biography articles. The block is for an indefinite duration, that is you are blocked until you can convince a reviewing administrator that you understand why you were blocked and are able to demonstrate an understanding of the bright-line policies you've been violating. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:16, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tinywings10, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SQGibbon (talk) 20:23, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 09:57, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]