User talk:Tigmo9098

This is Tigmo9098's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NORG, is solely reliant on a single primary source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Tigmo9098/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Tigmo9098/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tigmo9098! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Speedy deletion nomination of The New Federal State of China

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as The New Federal State of China, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Orenburg1 (talk) 07:20, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at China, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 21:16, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The New Federal State of China

A tag has been placed on The New Federal State of China requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Lack of any coverage by reputable secondary sources.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 21:21, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The New Federal State of China

The article The New Federal State of China has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability guidelines, per WP:SIGCOV. Lack of any significant coverage from independent and reliable secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 23:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The New Federal State of China for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The New Federal State of China is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The New Federal State of China until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mys_721tx (talk) 09:26, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to The New Federal State of China, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. SCP-2000 15:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Further reversions

Hi, before making any further reversions on The New Federal State of China I suggest you read WP:3RR. Kind regards. FOARP (talk) 15:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The New Federal State of China, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 00:15, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pls do not vandalize my entry.

This is the second time that editors shortened my entry to just a few paragraphs. Edits are welcome but deleting entire sections is offensive. I will report you to higher Admin if you do not stop doing this vandalism. --Tigmo9098 (talk) 01:29, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to report anyone you think is behaving badly at WP:ANI. However please note that Wikipedia is (within reason) an encyclopedia that anyone can edit. No-one owns a particular article. In particular, it is perfectly OK to delete pieces of unsourced text that are highly opinionated, not neutral, and apparently done to promote the subject. Please read WP:PROMO, WP:SOAP, WP:OR. FOARP (talk) 08:37, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if multiple editors are all coming here and telling you to stop doing something, it's probably wise to stop doing it. FOARP (talk) 08:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Tigmo9098! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Triggered a protection filter, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Tigmo9098! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, My page was nominated for deletion. Help! :(, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rule of Law (organisations) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rule of Law (organisations). Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 06:39, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rule of Law (organisations) (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

I cleaned this draft up somewhat, but it's still not ready for mainspace. Most problematic is that there are no reliable sources in this article connecting either the Rule of Law Foundation or the Rule of Law Society to the Rule of Law Fund announced by Guo/Bannon, and in fact one source has someone quoted denying that connection. Particularly given WP:BLP and the politically charged nature of this article, we need to have some basic facts straight before it is published.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rule of Law (organisations) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rule of Law (organisations), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:22, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rule of Law (organisations)

Hello, Tigmo9098. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rule of Law (organisations), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 23:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rule of Law (organisations)

Hello, Tigmo9098. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rule of Law".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! S0091 (talk) 22:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]