User talk:Tiggerjean1999

Welcome!

Hello, Tiggerjean1999, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Charles Ross Greening Doolittle Raider, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 03:12, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Charles Ross Greening Doolittle Raider

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Charles Ross Greening Doolittle Raider requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —C.Fred (talk) 03:12, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:BIO for guidance on what makes a person notable. I see nothing in the article you started to indicate that Greening is a significant person. Participation in the Doolittle Raid isn't sufficient, and there aren't any specific achievements listed for his art career. —C.Fred (talk) 17:33, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I had another look at this one, and enough secondary coverage to confirm significance. He has been the subject of at least one recent article, and I suspect that with more digging there are contemporary secondary sources available from the 1940's and 1950's. Tiggerjean1999, if you are aware of any additional sources that are not listed in the article yet, adding them would help us understand better if this individual does meet the guideline at WP:BIO. VQuakr (talk) 19:45, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Darya Andreichenko moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Darya Andreichenko, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 16:59, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Darya Andreichenko

The article Darya Andreichenko has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Praxidicae (talk) 17:08, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Darya Andreichenko

Hello, Tiggerjean1999,

Thanks for creating Darya Andreichenko! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for 3 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:32, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Darya Andreichenko for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darya Andreichenko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darya Andreichenko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 19:05, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of airplane songs

The article List of airplane songs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:LISTN, the topic is not encyclopedic enough to have a standalone article. Millions of songs have referenced airplanes, but that does not make them "airplane songs".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of airplane songs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of airplane songs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of airplane songs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —C.Fred (talk) 22:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello, I'm Beccaynr. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Mika Tosca, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please note there is an active discussion on the article Talk page. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 12:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]