User talk:Thierry Caro

Welcome!

Hello Thierry Caro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! EdwinHJ | Talk 04:55, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Reunionese music

Hi! I noticed that you nominated Shaamans for deletion. Could you look at another article, Baster (band)? Should it stay or go? Punkmorten 21:21, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Arrondissement of Saint-Denis, Réunion

Hi, The image you added looks good. I'm not clear though about the lines - are they rivers? There seem to be too many to correspond to the boundaries of cantons. Dlyons493 Talk 14:16, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for the reply - I wonder would it be useful to number them to correspond with the list in the article?. Dlyons493 Talk

Merci, je n'étais pas au fait avec ce lien. Dlyons493 Talk

Saint-Martin and Saint-Barth - NOT YET!!!

I see you have added to Overseas collectivity and Overseas departments and territories of France that Saint Martin and Saint-Barth are Overseas collectivities since the bill has passed. This is not correct. The bill has passed but it will be another six months before this status is effective after the law published in the official journal. See page 2 of this PDF: [1]. - Thanks, Hoshie 01:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reunion

Should we rename the new category Into Gouvernors and Prefects of Reunion? MadMaxDog 09:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probably misspelled both titles. But you'll know what I mean ;-) MadMaxDog 09:59, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Binding vs. Bending? en<->fr knot category links

Hello! Thanks for adding all the links between the fr and en knot categories. I'm impressed with the progress I've seen recently in the fr knotting articles. However one of the category links appears to be incorrect, the one between en:Category:Binding knots and fr:Catégorie:Nœud d'ajut. The knots in that French category appear to be bends (en:Category:Bend knots) rather than binding knots. Given the similarity between the words "bind" and "bend", perhaps that is the point of confusion. I've corrected this. However I couldn't find a fr category for binding knots, but if there is one please add the appropriate link. Regards and thanks again for your contributions. --Dfred (talk) 15:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of Chinese apartheid AfD

Following your recent participation in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of French apartheid, you may be interested to know that a related article, Allegations of Chinese apartheid, is currently being discussed on AfD. Comments can be left at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of Chinese apartheid. -- ChrisO 16:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject recruitment for WikiProjects

Thierry Caro,

Would you be interested in trying to make your (proposed) WikiProject becoming a succes by actively involving yourself in a recruitment agency aimed at establishing an active base of participants for a WikiProject?--Daanschr 11:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

L'Ame

Avec plaisir! -- Biruitorul (talk) 01:20, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Featured articles

Hi, just so you can participate fully in any discussions on the English Wikipedia, unlike the French Wikipedia there are no minimum requirements for your views to be counted. However, the decisions are the result of discussion and not a yes/no vote here.--Nilf anion (talk) 23:13, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reunion stubs

I don't object to their removal - you know the country better than I do - but I don't see that there's much I can do. If you re-list them, let me know and I'll be happy to back you up. --User:AlbertHerring ^{Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!} 13:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ca je comprend bien, m'sieu'. (Pardonnez-moi, mais cet ordinateur n'a pas des accents, je pense.) :) My chief concern is getting enough Reunion-geo-stubs together to have a decent-sized stub category. It requires 60; would you happen to know of any landforms that would help make up the difference? --User:AlbertHerring ^{Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!} 14:00, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then - I'll try and get some translations done today. I can't promise they'll be as complete as I'd like, tho'. --User:AlbertHerring ^{Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!} 14:25, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a few - how do they look? My high school French is a bit rusty, I fear. I'll do some more later; right now I've got a couple of translations I'd like to work up for DYK. --User:AlbertHerring ^{Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!} 15:19, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You call that rusty? I wish more American citizens spoke English as well as you - then maybe I wouldn't have such a hard time understanding people when I go out.

Take care. --User:AlbertHerring ^{Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!} 15:23, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Thierry, on a besoin de votre commentaire à Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Coeur Saignant, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commune Ango et Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girofle. Merci et A+! Gwen Gale (talk) 18:17, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vos commentaires ont été très appréciés à Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girofle. Si vous devez encore initier une discussion de suppression sur le Wikipédia anglais, il suffit d'ajouter à l'article le modèle (template en anglais) {{subst:afd}} sur le haut de l'article et de suivre les instructions sur ce modèle après. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 22:14, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Ocean

Hi, thanks for your comments. I will take the Saint-Paul thing on board and any help you can give on the French perspective would be appreciated. As for Corbet's action, I don't think it merits an article on its own, but see User:Jackyd101/Sandbox, where I am writing an article on the campaign as a whole and include information on that action. Thanks for your interest --Jackyd101 (talk) 14:56, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a thought, if you add the new information from French sources and provide references on the talk pages, then I can add it to the articles in English of the appropriate standard. Would this work for you!--Jackyd101 (talk) 15:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Claude Fischler

I have nominated Claude Fischler, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claude Fischler. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:56, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lilly Wood and the Prick

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lilly Wood and the Prick requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ~~Awsome EBE123~~(talk | Contribs) 20:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Undid

It's quite obvious you do not know much about volcanology. I just undid your vague undos to my edits to Category:Volcanism and Category:Volcanology, simply because volcanism is a topic of volcanology and that is why I made Category:Volcanism a subcat of Category:Volcanology. Just because I left WikiProject Volcanoes dosen't mean you can go around undoing my edits. If you want proof volcanology is about more than volcanoes I suggest you read this. I understand there is lots of users on this website that just do not know what they are doing but I am not one of them. I have been studying volcanology for more than 5 years and I know what I am talking about. Volcanoguy 04:45, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

it.wiki : Call for resignations

Hi, I fully agree with your idea/proposal: meta:Wikimedia_Forum#Call_for_resignations.

The key point is that admins are no way allowed to apply censorship/denial of service to a part or to the whole Wikipedia without having previously:

fulfilled a poll to the users of the Wikipedia project
asked WMF for legal support and agreed about the proper thing to do

All the italian sysops that decided the motu proprio strike have betrayed the faith of the users who chose them as admins. We now have to get them resign their sysops status and, altogether, decide a proper guideline that every admin will be compelled to follow when dealing with hot topics such as the freedom of Wikipedia itself.

Jimbo, I understand that - dealing with italian law and politics - you support the italian style action of dramatic blanking. I don't understand why you agree with the fact that this blanking has been done without consensus: (1) Italian editors have not been proposed any poll, (2) WMF has not been asked any suggestion nor legal support. Please be sure that admins of local projects, in the future, will no more be able to perform such a denail of service without consensus with editors and WMF. ZipoBibrok5x10^8 (talk) 14:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

I am told that this was not a small group of admins, that it was discussed for a long time, and that there was strong support. However, having said that, I agree with you that in the future process should be much clearer, and actions like this should be taken in coordination with the Foundation and the wider community. One reason for that is so that we can time it to have maximum impact, give solid PR support from the Foundation, etc. This has never happened before, and we had no warning, so, you know, it's a little complicated.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 15:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

and moreover

I had a question about issue actually. I've been having a very hard time understanding how a process of discussion that even remotely resembles consensus building around this issue could have occurred while no one outside of the Italian Wikipedia was aware of it. It's just not possible unless the Italian Wikipedia is no bigger than a dozen editors. So in what manner exactly was this "under discussion in the Italian community for months," as Jimbo says? Like I said, I'm having a hard time understanding that, and maybe Jimbo or someone from the Italian Wiki can shed light on this.Griswaldo (talk) 15:07, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

These are good questions and I'm sure clear light will be shed on them in due course. I would love it if you would go and ask them and then report back here what you learn.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 15:16, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Talking ad Jimbonem is only a strong suggestion, but please get in touch and let's start a proper democratic - horizontal process where we will decide proper guidelines and proper reaction to this shameful event. ZipoBibrok5x10^8 (talk) 23:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Bonjour Thierry,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Phelsuma-laticauda-Saint-Denis.JPG is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 23, 2011. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2011-12-23. howcheng {chat} 18:43, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. When you recently edited Réunion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Témoignages (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:38, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi^{t | c} 17:35, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved!

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com your Wikipedia username.
To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).

A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:15, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pierre Durand, Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Duguay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

==Your Sakay article ==on French wiki is completely misplaced on map, and there is another article about that town under its correct name.

see: Ankadinondry Sakay

Please correct, or better: just throw it out. Rgds Tonton Bernardo (talk) 08:28, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:40, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 15:46, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amaury Lavernhe

Hello, Thierry Caro. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Amaury Lavernhe, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Amaury Lavernhe to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 19:28, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You For This Moment

Has the book been translated yet? I used the French title because it hadn't when I created the page. Thus, the English title is fictional.Zigzig20s (talk) 23:14, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My point is that the English title does not exist as the book has not yet been released in English...

Wikipedia email re Newspapers.com signup

Hello, Thierry Caro. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HazelAB (talk) 14:59, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Krissy Moehl

The article Krissy Moehl has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 08:11, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder how it feels to love bureaucracy so much. Thierry Caro (talk) 08:24, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Krissy Moehl

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Krissy Moehl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Compassionate727 (talk) 17:16, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Krissy Moehl

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Krissy Moehl, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Compassionate727 (talk) 14:58, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am too busy reading Kafka. Thierry Caro (talk) 18:14, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why the change to US Open of Surfing?

The US Open of Surfing article was originally U.S. Open of Surfing. That is how it is reported in the major newspaper of the area. The stylized US Open is used on the website. The MOS:US guideline indicates that U.S. is the dominant abbreviation for United States. You did not include an edit summary with your move, so will you please explain why you made the change? Thanks, Bahooka (talk) 03:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bahooka. Their website uses no dot. Thierry Caro (talk) 12:44, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The site does not use periods, but reliable secondary sources do. Using "U.S." is also more consistent with Wikipedia's MoS. An explanation or discussion at the time of the move would have been helpful. Bahooka (talk) 14:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I trust you my friend. Thierry Caro (talk) 14:51, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Setup (storytelling), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plot. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Thierry Caro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Arnolfini Portrait does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Eric ^talk 22:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Thierry Caro. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

French Africa work group

Thank you for quality articles such as Krissy Moehl and Claude Fischler, for Main page image File:Phelsuma-laticauda-Saint-Denis.JPG, for creating the French Africa work group, for admin duties in French, for all these page moves, and Wikidata items on classical composers, for service from 2005, Thierry, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:06, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were recipient no. 1941 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:47, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notability in question

There is no article Ultra-Trail World Tour. Why is there and why are there articles (however poorly sourced) about some of the constituent races thereof? --Orange Mike | Talk 21:44, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thierry Caro (talk) 04:20, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Historic hotels

Hi there. I notice you created w:Category:Historic Hotels of America. Why not use w:Category:Historic hotels in the United States? Magnolia677 (talk) 11:22, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Magnolia677: Hello. You can have a look at Historic Hotels of America, where this explains itself. Thierry Caro (talk) 12:54, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then why didn't you name the category "National Trust for Historic Preservation hotels"? Magnolia677 (talk) 14:38, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The National Trust for Historic Preservation has other programs into which hotels may be included. The Panama Hotel, for instance, is cited among the National Treasures but it does not appear among the Historic Hotels of America. Using the unspecific name of the Trust would thus be confusing when it comes to the intended content of the category. Thierry Caro (talk) 14:44, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't make any sense, but ok. You linked "Category:Historic Hotels of America" to the parent w:Category:National Trust for Historic Preservation, yet you added "Category:Historic Hotels of America" to Alpenhof Lodge and other articles that don't appear to have any connection to the National Trust for Historic Preservation? Magnolia677 (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Historic Hotels of America is a program by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, so Category:Historic Hotels of America is a subcategory of Category:National Trust for Historic Preservation. And then the Alpenhof Lodge is one of the hotels that are part of the program and the article thus falls in Category:Historic Hotels of America. The logical chain is quite simple. The Alpenhof Lodge is recognized by the National Trust for Historic Preservation as worth of its Historic Hotels of America standard. Thierry Caro (talk) 17:02, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Alpenhof Lodge, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This is the second time I have reverted unsourced content you have added to this article. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:00, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Thierry Caro. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Chapin Mesa Museum

Hello, Thierry Caro,

Thanks for creating Chapin Mesa Museum! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:37, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Forêts National Park

Hello, Thierry Caro,

Thank you for creating Forêts National Park.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi, Nice start to the article. I can't find any references to this park - It is the same as National forest (France)?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 00:03, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hughesdarren: A national forest is something different. It is a type of forest. The Forêts National Park is a specific national park, a new one, which by the way includes some national forests. Thierry Caro (talk) 00:10, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK was just checking, but you will still need to include a reference in the Forêts article, even if the reference is in French. Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 00:14, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Forêts National Park moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Forêts National Park, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:56, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I really love drafts, though not as much as bureaucracy. Thierry Caro (talk) 03:02, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

U r funny. Anyhow, i added a bit, and "submitted" it to ArticlesForCreation, and it was promptly moved back to mainspace. Thank you for starting it. It is now partially my imperfect translation of the French wikipedia article. Do you know what is the template to use on the Talk page, or otherwise how to indicate that / give credit properly? --Doncram (talk) 13:51, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm Cordless Larry. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:44, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cordless Larry: The source is the NYT, added to Wikidata. Thanks for your watch. Thierry Caro (talk) 21:45, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. The information still needs to be included in the article to justify the categorisation though, I think. It's strange that none of the other obituaries I've found mention the coronavirus as the cause of death (although the NYT attribute that to his son, so I can't see it being a mistake). Cordless Larry (talk) 22:09, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cordless Larry: I suppose the son has been debriefed by his father's medical team and the New York Times was probably the only source to bother and call the family for extra details. Whatever, I'll let you decide what to do with it. I personally think it's wise enough to assume this is correct. Thierry Caro (talk) 22:14, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's strange, because his death got quite a lot of attention from the BBC. Anyway, I've now used the source and re-added the category to the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peaceful Valley Ranch

I noticed you recently created a French article on the ranch - I just expanded the article significantly, you're welcome to borrow from it. My wife and I were in the park in the fall of 2018, as you may have guessed from all those pictures, and it was one of our favorite places on that trip. Acroterion (talk) 01:33, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Acroterion: Do you think you could do something for me here, on the English Wikipedia? I'd like Category:National Register of Historic Places lists in the National Park Service to have each list stored into a new dedicated subcategory such as Category:National Register of Historic Places in Guadalupe Mountains National Park. We have fr:Catégorie:Registre national des lieux historiques dans un parc national on the French Wikipedia and I want its content to have interwikis. Can you help with that? I guess the tidying of the main category is also an opportunity to update the lists with possible missing entries. Thierry Caro (talk) 03:31, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly, I'll work on it when I get a chance in the next couple of days. Acroterion (talk) 03:41, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've started with Category:National Register of Historic Places in Acadia National Park, and populated it with the relevant sites. One thing to watch out for - some parks cover portions of more than one county, even small parks, so I stuck to modifying Category:Acadia National Park to Category:National Register of Historic Places in Acadia National Park and left Category:National Register of Historic Places in Hancock County, Maine alone. Isle au Haut is in Knox County, and while that part of the park doesn't have any NRHP listings, I want to keep the category structure rational. Acroterion (talk) 00:29, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Acroterion: Thank you for this. I hope we can have everything done eventually. Moreover, I have even more work for you! Gamlin Cabin is missing from National Register of Historic Places listings in Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Parks. Can you fix that, possibly? Thierry Caro (talk) 17:50, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've been buried with work the past week, and nowadays I'm working from home, so going back in front of the computer in the evening has less charm than before. However, I'll gradually work my way through the categories and lists as I've been doing. You may want to adjust the category structure to suit your ideas on how the lists and categories should relate. And I'll see if I can get an article for the Gamlin Cabin. Acroterion (talk) 20:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Acroterion: Category:National Register of Historic Places lists in the National Park Service is now much better. Thank you for your help! Thierry Caro (talk) 06:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finishing those up, it's a lot better now. I'd like to go through the lists and add some articles once I get past some work deadlines. I'll have a look at Gamlin Cabin. Acroterion (talk) 01:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Forêts National Park has been accepted

Forêts National Park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 13:41, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of covid deaths

List of deaths due to COVID-19 has been proposed again for deletion. Your opinion on the matter could be useful --Pesqara (talk) 15:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for deaths due to COVID-19 and related RfC

Hi. Thanks for commenting at the recent AfD for the above list. There is now an ongoing discussion around the best way to split the list, if any, if you wish to comment further. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:43, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Historic Hotels Worldwide has been nominated for deletion

Category:Historic Hotels Worldwide has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:34, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Normally I would listify the category contents in the Historic Hotels Worldwide but that is a redlink. In case you want to create a list article, here are the current category contents so you don't lose any work: - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:34, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category contents

{{collapse bottom

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:29, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lyon 25 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lyon 25, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 15:26, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lyon 25

Hello, Thierry Caro. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lyon 25, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lyon 25

Hello, Thierry Caro. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lyon 25".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:52, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:20, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Metro in Kraków, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metro. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]