User talk:Thenerick579yt

April 2021

Hello, I'm CommanderNumNuts. I wanted to let you know that I Loved one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Nerick 579 because it Was The Best damn Thing Ive Ever Heard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:07, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thenerick579yt, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Thenerick579yt! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nerick 579 (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nerick 579 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nerick 579, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:56, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Thenerick579yt

we aint deleting shit

April 2022

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Ted Nugent. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 15:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

so your saying he doesn't have a tiktok because i talked to him on tiktok and he told me to message his VERIFIED instagram now he follows me on instagram so he is not a reliable source because its his tiktok i have a instagram message of him screenshotting his account and sending it to me ON HIS VERIFIED INSTAGRAM ACCOUNT Thenerick579yt (talk) 15:35, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

my name on instagram is @uncle.ted.nugent Thenerick579yt (talk) 15:36, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is built on WP:SECONDARY sources coming from reliable publications. Your TikTok doesn't count as a reliable source. Binksternet (talk) 16:16, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

its teds tiktok so teds not a reliable source Thenerick579yt (talk) 16:57, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cannot use his TikTok as a source. See WP:BLPSPS. Binksternet (talk) 17:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok ill just message him for sources now mybad have a great day Thenerick579yt (talk) 17:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:Thenerick579yt. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. PAVLOV (talk) 17:02, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Motor City Mayhem moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Motor City Mayhem, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 18:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Motor City Mayhem

Hello, Thenerick579yt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Motor City Mayhem".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:28, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rebel 45

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rebel 45 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 19:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello i was wondering why this was deleted i created this page because i need a wikipedia page for rebel 45 i also saw that this notice says the information is not accurate if you have any questions or don't believe this is accurate you can dm me on instagram @imrebel45 and i will let you know if the info is accurate Thenerick579yt (talk) 19:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not about the accuracy, it's about the fact that your YouTube channel is very likely far from notable. Ideally, you'd need multiple secondary sources to demonstrate notability, but to avoid speedy deletion, a claim of importance (lower than notability) is enough (see Wikipedia:Common claims of significance or importance). Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 19:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lil Gobby John

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lil Gobby John requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pichpich (talk) 19:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]