User talk:The Rogue Penguin/Archive7
This is an archive of past discussions with User:The Rogue Penguin. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Fanart
When people upload real, copyrighted images, they get deleted. I'm uploading GFDL-licensed fanrt which is as close to the real thing as it's possible to get so please stop removing my images unless you have better ones.--Arsenal666 13:35, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Bleach
Bleh, Artist went and posted our "merging trouble" at WP:FICT. On a side note though, is it "the" Soul Society, or just Soul Society? Because most of the synopsis Artist wrote has "the" Soul Society.--Hanaichi 03:15, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
ANN is pretty much the word when it comes to Bleach episodes but I'll forgive your ignorance this time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.45.37.34 (talk) 09:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry
Sorry about the picture issue. I just think they should be there to inform the reader. I know they are fair use, which I why I put a rationale on the Rekin one. Thanks, Codelyoko193 Talk 19:44, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Yinyanglightningthrash
I see loads of tables like that showing UK dates.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yinyanglightningthrash (talk • contribs) 14:37, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
You are really starting to get on my nerves, everything I edit, you always check and change sometimes you are wrong sometimes you are right, check carefully before you undo -_-Yinyanglightningthrash 15:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
WILL YOU STOP REMOVING THE COMING SOON SECTION , pokemon diamond and pearl is coming to cartoon network, dont remove it! All you are doing is deleting neccesary informationYinyanglightningthrash 16:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
It does not say original air date -.-Yinyanglightningthrash 15:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
At least be polite, geesh....Yinyanglightningthrash 16:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- I've been reverting these too. They are really annoying, and need to stop. --Thanks, Codelyoko193 Talk 17:02, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
what do you mean merge? =SYinyanglightningthrash 11:47, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
revert issue on list of ben 10 articles
Someguy I understand that yingyanglightningthrash has been annoying undoing your reverts about airdates and you've done the right thing talking to him on his talk page, however you should have tried to avoid continuing reverting him as you have broken the 3 revert rule, next time don't fall to his level and let other users help deal with him.--Lerdthenerd 19:45, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Jiraiyageninteam.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jiraiyageninteam.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shell babelfish 04:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Also
Oh, I'd also like to point out that if you want to leave a new thread on a talk page, pres the "plus" symbol next to the edit button. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:53, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Smile!
Blue-EyesGold Dragon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
LotTL
You incredible geek. :-)--SarekOfVulcan 01:16, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
it isnt Rin'negan
ask any translator--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 02:25, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- -_- I AM a fucking translator, the ' is only to styleise it, stop being a jerk you don't know anything about me--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 03:45, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- http://www.google.com.au/search?num=30&hl=en&safe=off&q=Rinnegan+%2Bnaruto&btnG=Search&meta= =460
- http://www.google.com.au/search?num=30&hl=en&safe=off&q=Rin%27negan+%2Bnaruto&btnG=Search&meta= =022 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blue eyes gold dragon (talk • contribs) 03:52, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- "That proves nothing except that people don't like to type and apostrophe" that is the lamest thing i have ever heard, that is a bad excuse--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 03:58, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
ok i will http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=rinne+%2Bnaruto&btnG=Google+Search&meta= =14,100 http://www.google.com.au/search?num=30&hl=en&safe=off&q=rin%27ne+%2Bnaruto&btnG=Search&meta=904 "google" "Did you mean: rinne +naruto"--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 04:00, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
You cant use a computer to translate it--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 04:05, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
oh i'm sorry did i make you angry?--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 04:09, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
my 16 years of Japaneses tells me otherwise, i mean you cant just translate a sentence with google ect--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 04:11, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
yea i reverted 3 times but in 2 days--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 04:12, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
and that isnt a revet! thats changing text--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 04:13, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- your sexiest arnt you?--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 04:18, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
October 2007
Looks like you reeeally need to practice your self-control. Or maybe I'm thinking of You Can't See Me!. I know one of you has a problem with over-reverting. On a lighter note:
The world's hungriest paperweight has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
And look on the bright side: At least it's only 24 hours. ;) The world's hungriest paperweight 05:04, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yep, at least there's that. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 05:05, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- O_o That was a fast response. Do you train with Sonic or something? The world's hungriest paperweight 05:14, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Someone has to take after the poor blue hedgehog after he hit that spikestrip. Seriously though, just good timing. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 05:27, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Tayuya's Doki are demons?
Hey The Rogue Penguin/Archive7, I recently changed this thinking it would sound more factual but it also looks like WP:OR. Aside from the questionable translation, what actually supports that they are demons? I don't recall the manga clearing this up, perhaps the databook does? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 16:55, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Omnitrix alien pics
For the rest of the conversation, see User talk:HungryPaperweight#Images
Okay, Spitter and Articguana I can understand, but what about Benmummy and Way Big? They appeared on Ken 10, so shouldn't they be allowed to keep a picture? Why did you remove them? The world's hungriest paperweight 05:55, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry it took so long for me to respond. Anyways, I guess I can let Benmummy go if I have to, but I still think Way Big deserves his picture back. After all, his debut was in the movie and he was vital in defeating Kevin 11,000. But this is probably something we're just plain going to disagree on, so there's no point in dragging it out too far. The world's hungriest paperweight 04:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Coming Soon Section On Articles
Could you please stop removing coming soon section on UK TV channel articles! They should be leave like that! HMR, 18:21 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Yammy anime.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Yammy anime.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:23, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Rinnegan?
so are we sticking with Rinnegan now? from this edit it look like you are going with Rinnegan--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 06:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- ok, sorry you get blocked too, from the reverting thing--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 06:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- yea but only one other time--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 06:25, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Bleach template.
Hey, someone has been adding the Nel Tu page link nonstop (despite it being a redirect). I've left a message at her talkpage, but she seems to think that Nel is a big character and all. We've already discussed this in the big war (remember all the headaches we had because of the merging?) so I've told her to go to the discussion page to talk it out. However, I don't know whether it will work. Perhaps you can help in this situation? Thanks.--Hanaichi 04:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For all your great work on the Naruto and Naruto related articles Blue-EyesGold Dragon 10:43, 14 October 2007 (UTC) |
Fair use rationale for Image:AquaTeenMovie DVDcover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:AquaTeenMovie DVDcover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Domestic Correction 11:20, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Pain/Pein
I read the wrong thing. I read this instead of this. Sorry about the mix up. --Ryu-chan (Talk | Contributions) 18:50, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Sorry
Sorry... Please dont block me Freemonkeyinside 03:16, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I'm not sorry, honestly. I never meant to hurt anyone, though. But I'm still not sorry at all. I thought it was hallarious. Have a good'n Freemonkeyinside 03:20, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
OK i really am sorry. Freemonkeyinside 03:24, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
not vandalism
I know we dont see eye to eye but those last two sockpuppet tags werent vandalism. see Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism. I added them because they were suspected there. Freemonkeyinside 03:29, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Princefigs
You're a master of understatement..."This user isn't taking his one-week block too well"...heh.. Dreadstar † 04:19, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi. You warned the original author of the article not to blank the page. Original authors are allowed to do this if no other substantial edits have been made. If you see this happening, the best thing to do is add a {{db-author}} tag. Happy editing! --NeilN 02:53, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- You have a point but CSD G7 says "Author requests deletion, if requested in good faith, and provided the page's only substantial content was added by its author. If the author blanks the page, this can be taken as a deletion request." --NeilN 03:09, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for reverting the edits of vandalism on my userpage. I never knew Freemonkeyinside had vandalized my page until I saw it on my watchlist. Once again, thanks!--Sli723 04:32, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Plant alien image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Plant alien image.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ripjaw image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ripjaw image.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:18, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Stinkfly image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Stinkfly image.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cannonbolt.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Cannonbolt.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:25, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Grey matter image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Grey matter image.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:25, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ghostfreak image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ghostfreak image.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:29, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Heatblast image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Heatblast image.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:33, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Diamondhead image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Diamondhead image.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:36, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wildmutt image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Wildmutt image.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:38, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Fourarms image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Fourarms image.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:True ghostfreak.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:True ghostfreak.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Suggestion
Hello, Someguy0830. Perhaps when you revert someone's changes, you could give a reason. (Like instead of just "rv", maybe "rv, unsourced" or "rv, not needed.") That way others could see your reasons. Thanks, and happy editing! Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 21:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Konan
What I'm thinking, being a Devil's Advocate, Jiraiya is saying that despite what has gone on, her childhood, joining Akatsuki, being Pein's angel, etc. Konan still turned out to be beautiful. --Naruto Tron 02:07, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- well, am I not just providing a reason why it is relevant, which is what everyone has to do when they edit here? BTW, I'm not deliberately trying to argue with you, now I just want to figure out this distinction. --Naruto Tron 02:16, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- It seems to me that you can't judge what is relevant off of only what is literally there. Things that are said have to be taken in the context of prior events. Jiraiya felt that she died, his comment on how beautiful she has become is saying,"in spite of what has happened" she has grown up to be beautiful. --Naruto Tron 02:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Whatever, it wasn't a big deal to begin with. --Naruto Tron 02:37, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- It seems to me that you can't judge what is relevant off of only what is literally there. Things that are said have to be taken in the context of prior events. Jiraiya felt that she died, his comment on how beautiful she has become is saying,"in spite of what has happened" she has grown up to be beautiful. --Naruto Tron 02:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shunshunrikka.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Shunshunrikka.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:WilliamXana.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:WilliamXana.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Franz hopper image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Franz hopper image.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jim image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jim image.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Marabounta image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Marabounta image.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:WilliamLyoko.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:WilliamLyoko.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Codelyoko193
A few questions:
- Should we add the pictures of the characters to List of primary characters in Code Lyoko?
- Exactly what information should we merge to said article?
Thanks, Codelyoko193 Talk Contributions 23:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ditto.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ditto.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:41, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Codelyokoquestforinfinity.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Codelyokoquestforinfinity.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:01, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Naruto Uzumaki
I read the manga and watch the subbed anime. Naruto contains the Yang chakra of the nine tailed demon fox. Jiriya spoke with frog about it in chapter 370 of the shipuudden series. http://groups.msn.com/NarutoMangaReturns/chapter370discussion.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=44871 theres the exact page where they begin the discussion. It clearly mentions that Minato, Naruto's father, separated the yin chakra from the yang, sealed the yang chakra within Naruto, and the yin chakra within himself.
Please read the manga before changing my edits. Thank you Buttcheeks 18:42, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ghostfreak image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ghostfreak image.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:37, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Grey matter image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Grey matter image.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:38, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cannonbolt.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Cannonbolt.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:39, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Diamondhead image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Diamondhead image.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:51, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ben10 ep13 image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ben10 ep13 image.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:00, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
If the talk page isnt the place for Tobi/Obito theories, where is?KyuubiSeal 15:52, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Naruto Uzumaki again..
I fail to understand why you're insisting on your version of events. I insist on my edit because it quotes the manga directly. Nothing about it is speculation. In the manga it says that Minato only sealed the Yin chakra with the Dead demon seal, and that the reason he carefully separated it from the yang chakra and sealed the yang chakra in naruto was so that he could leave it for him.
Why would Minato separate the chakra if he intended on sealing all of it in Naruto anyway? How could the Dead demon seal seal the kyuubi in Naruto? None of that makes sense. So please please, explain to me your thinking process on this one, if only to shut me up. I mean, saying I'm incorrect is like saying the manga is incorrect... Buttcheeks 20:40, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Drake Circus
I respect your honesty and diligence in dealing with the constant misappropriation of our culture and inheritance. Many thanks. Curator, Curatorpccgovuk 00:36, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Drake Circus 2
why did you vandalise this page by deleting its entire contents without any discussion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.168.157 (talk) 02:36, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Post-credits scene
Do you want to at all talk about the edits? Because I figured that the whole point of dispute resolution is to talk about things when people disagree. I'd appreciate it if you'd respond to this at all. Kimpire 08:38, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Shinigami
What's up Someguy0830? I was thinking, should I categorize the shinigami in Bleach in Category:Fictional swordsmen, Category:Fictional samurai or both? Perhaps one is the parent of another? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 16:27, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- And which is the parent cat/grandparent cat? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:01, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Very interesting, you may want to read this. The accuser appears to be a suspect himself now. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Think I should add him to this checkuser? He even says here why he initially created the account. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:24, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Very interesting, you may want to read this. The accuser appears to be a suspect himself now. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the little tweak at the top of the article, it looks so much neater now. It's amazing just how re-ordering tags can make such a difference :) ---- WebHamster 01:44, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- I can cope with the whining, it's the running round after the little sprogs reverting all the damage that's pissing me off. Got bugger all useful done today. I need to spend more time whittling down the over-abundant info I have for the zoo article instead of dealing with post-adolescent rebelliousness. ---- WebHamster 01:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Who is Tyar?
OK, so it appears I have been suspected of being the sockpuppet of a user named Tyar. Who is this guy, and what makes people think that I am him? Sasuke9031 06:19, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- I tried, but he just keeps removing everything I say. I though maybe you would know, since the accuser won't even listen to me, but I guess I was wrong. Sasuke9031 06:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Team Sound
While Sasuke was with Orochimaru they abandoned their normal base in the Sound Village and Kabuto said they would have to change bases every week. That would mean that they'd be together all the time. And they were also together during the Sasuke and Sai Arc. And when Sasuke killed Orochimaru. That's when Sasuke left their team. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keyblade626 (talk • contribs) 13:19, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
But they traveled together which makes them a team. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keyblade626 (talk • contribs) 18:15, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- I was either confused by the "Third Hokage" reference, or by the Restoril I just took. Agggh, I'll sort it out after I sleep. JuJube 18:02, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the support, they just won't listen. Tyar 00:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Whats the big idea??
Why did you delete the article on my talk page? That was my hard work to get myself unblocked. Enoch08 04:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Naruto geography
An article that you have been involved in editing, Naruto geography, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naruto geography (2nd nomination).
Another editor started it 2 November and I just noticed that the contributors still needed to be notified. --A. B. (talk) 19:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
I apologize
Seems I've involved you in two minour battles. I asked an expert on fiction to step in for Ichigo's article, hope you don't mind. And about using redirects for dabs, a sysop had me aware of the guideline, and he told me that redirects should be used in use whenever possible. Why did you remove one from Kuwabara? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 09:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe I did take in something too literal. So you're implying that they should only be used when it has to deal with MOS:DAB#Piping? If so, why remove Kuwabara (Hikaru no Go) and not Kuwabara (YuYu Hakusho) from that particular dab page? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 09:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- I... don't know what to say. One person says use redirects (if possible), two others say don't. Otherwise, I don't think I'm understanding your logic. I put up the span coding on the Hikaru no Go article. Perhaps I need to know one last thing: when is the only time to ever use redirects and not the main links? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 10:09, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Back on Ichigo's article, I think "protagonist" is already saying "main character". Saying "main protagonist" in there sounds like "main main character" but hey, I could be wrong. Your thought? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 10:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- I... don't know what to say. One person says use redirects (if possible), two others say don't. Otherwise, I don't think I'm understanding your logic. I put up the span coding on the Hikaru no Go article. Perhaps I need to know one last thing: when is the only time to ever use redirects and not the main links? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 10:09, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mistswords.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mistswords.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:43, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Korean pop
Just letting you know that the actual article name is K-pop, so there's no need to change everything to Korean pop music, because it'll redirect to K-Pop anyway. SKS2K6 15:13, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up. Will see to it after I have dinner and notify other users of their redunant images. =) σмgнgσмg 07:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. Found the source anyway. Oh well. σмgнgσмg 07:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
New category
I created Category:Arrancar in Bleach. Should clear up the category mess on those arrancar articles, any help from you would be greatly appreciated, and you can categorize the arrancar redirects with the said category since this guideline allows so. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- You have any questions? Seems that you're lost or something. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 20:20, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Just a heads up
I prod'ed both Naruto 2008 movie and Nguyen Khoa because they both seem to be hoaxes created by the same user, NicolasLord (talk · contribs). I was wondering if you could help me with the process as I am fairly new to the whole article deletion thing. Also, I noticed that the fake Naruto movie article already got prod'ed once and it was removed by an IP who seems to be a sockpuppet of NicolasLord. If my prod gets taken down, could you help me with the AFD process? Thanks. --GhostStalker(Got a present for ya! | Mission Log) 01:47, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, they're gone already. That was fast... --GhostStalker(Got a present for ya! | Mission Log) 16:37, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Thoughts on
The comments at the FLC nomination for List of Naruto chapters. I think his idea is fine, I just would like outside input before actually performing the action. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 02:47, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Sharingan.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sharingan.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Cryptic 13:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Italics
You had me aware of italisising foreign words and now you oppose it? I'd like for you to show me the guideline where it explains that it should be avoided, specifically for headers, like the one in Superman (Kal-L). I wish WP:MJ#Body text would be clearer on this. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:41, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- If I understand you correctly, non-English terms and titles of works in headers are not supposed to be italisised? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:08, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- And you re-put Nnoitra's defaultsort as Jiruga, Nnoitra after it was said that Jiruga wasn't his surname, see this. I'm trying to figure out who's wrong. For example, would Zaku Abumi's deafaultsort be Zaku Abumi or Abumi Zaku? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:28, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- Not trying to be a mosquito in your ear, can you quickly check the defaultsorts on Might Guy, Zaku Abumi, Dosu Kinuta, and Kin Tsuchi? Are they sorted right? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 20:14, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- And you re-put Nnoitra's defaultsort as Jiruga, Nnoitra after it was said that Jiruga wasn't his surname, see this. I'm trying to figure out who's wrong. For example, would Zaku Abumi's deafaultsort be Zaku Abumi or Abumi Zaku? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:28, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Village Pump (Policy)
Thanks for moving that for me, I don't know how I ended up putting that there, a bitt too much caffeine and too late at night probably, very much appreciated.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 11:04, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Creating A Article Well Deserved 3RR
I don't appreciate you trying to put me on limitation when all I did was create the article properly with no false information. The character deserves to have her own page and is consistently in the series. If you want to contribute to it Ino Yamanaka I have no problem with that, but try getting me in trouble because you personally do not feel she deserves her own article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcelite (talk • contribs) — Someguy0830 (T | C) 06:24, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
It makes no sense what so ever to have the Article redirected. It will continued to be discussed and I too could have you blocked from editing. For now I believe it deserves attention, and makes no sense why Shikamaru has his own page however she doesn't. Mcelite 06:30, 14 November 2007 (UTC)mcelite
Admin
Hi. I'd like to nominate you as an admin, as I think you're qualified. Let me know if you're interested. Epbr123 10:22, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Rather important discussion
Is here. Most of his changes are good, and should be implemented. Discussion is important to hammer out the details though. Your input would be highly appreciated. Thanks, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 02:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Oops
Sorry about this edit on the plot introduction section. I was testing something out and forgot to double check, think I'll stop for today. Thanks, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:21, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- Quick thing, can the prod tag be taken off Byakuya? I won't banter further, and the page shouldn't be deleted. I'll stop taking JHunterJ's advice and only use redirects to prevent the "#" piping. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 05:23, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- I'll fix em if you give me the chance. Will you still resort to afd? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 05:32, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- I guess, your method will save me the work. I will remove the template now. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 05:49, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- I'll fix em if you give me the chance. Will you still resort to afd? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 05:32, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Bender's Big Score
Why did you revert my summary? --Yuefairchild (talk) 06:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
I'll admit I halfassed it, but come on! This is an encyclopedia, not a store, Fox won't sue us for breaking street date. Do you have any reason we should wait to put up the plot summary besides the fact that it's what we always do, an official rule or something?--Yuefairchild (talk) 06:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair enough. When I finish the summary, can we use it on the 27 if I stop being so wordy at least?--Yuefairchild (talk) 06:25, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Reverts on List of Omnitrix aliens
Hello. I noticed that your reversions on the List of Omnitrix aliens article violated the 3RR policy. Specifically trying to take out the section about Eon after multiple editors put it in. I'm just warning you because I'd rather not report this to the Noticeboard (especially since you have a previous block for 3RR). In the future, please try to work with editors in those situations. Come to a consensus on the talk page and don't edit war when you disagree with consensus. We're all in this together.
P.S. All glory to the Hypnotoad! - Superlex (talk) 01:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
No content in Category:Eureka episodes
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Eureka episodes, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Eureka episodes has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Eureka episodes, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 01:30, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
"Inherently notable"
There is no such thing as inherently notable in the fashion that you're talking about. Inherently notable would mean that because major box office movies are always covered by reviewers and always have in-depth commentary that they will definitely have sources. That is not the case for some minor TV/straight to DVD movie. There is a chance that it may have been reviewed, and there is a chance for detailed commentary, but there is also the chance that there is nothing. It needs to have its notability asserted to stay as an article. You can reply here. TTN (talk) 21:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- I don't normally reply on my page, but ok. First off, you can use some common sense in your notability judgments, rather than offhandedly redirecting every fiction article you find. Throwing away the entire article and its contents simply because you don't think it's notable is hardly a helpful practice, as your arbcom case would indicate. Poor writing aside, several of the external links assert notability, as do DVD sales, ratings, etc, even if they are not properly integrated into the article. In short, redirecting it is foolish. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 22:00, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Amazon reviews are not reliable. IMDb is only good for casting information. The last one is a shop. Unless there are other external links that I'm not seeing, none of those help. DVD sales do not assert or establish notability (sales are supplemental information), and they can easily be covered on the list or within something that would contain sales for any other DVDs the series may have. If you know of non-trivial reviews, add them. While they may seem like a given, it may just be pure speculation on your part. With absolutely nothing asserting notability, and absolutely no precedent, there is no reason to believe that the article has potential. TTN (talk) 22:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- I google the movie and on the first three or so pages I can pick out at least four different sites that post reviews, Rotten Tomatoes among them. The movie is notable because it was aired on television, reviewed, sold as a DVD, and so on. Simply because the main editors of the article did a poor job does not affect that. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 22:17, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Besides Rotten Tomatoes, I cannot see anything within those pages that can be used to truly establish notability. Rotten Tomatoes cannot be used because there is no overall rating available, which is what it is used for in articles. Trying to create a reception section from anything else would just mean taking trivial quotes from trivial sites to build an overall trivial section. That is not notability. TTN (talk) 22:26, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- There's also creator interviews, though offhand I couldn't say if the DVD carries commentary of some kind. The point is, it doesn't take much to find information for such a thing, and redirecting this without taking any effort to merge the material accomplishes nothing. At the very least, most episode lists have a description to fall back on. Billy and Mandy doesn't even have that. If you really insist on redirecting, make an effort to merge first, and even then there wouldn't be a valid reason to apart from quality concerns. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 22:41, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Only two questions in that have anything to do with it, so it's not enough without any DVD commentary. When it's just plot summary, it is much easier to let those familiar with it create a new summary rather than spending twenty minutes trying to read over it and figure out what the key point are and then form those into a decent summary of something that I have never seen. With those interview details, it can probably be worth it add a one paragraph summary and those. Will that be acceptable for now? TTN (talk) 22:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- I'd be fine if you hacked away at the plot summary. That needs trimming anyway. A paragraph seems a bit short, but it's been a while since I've seen it and a paragraph will cover the basics. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 22:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- I cannot really make heads or tails of the actual plot from what's available, so will you be fine with the basic outline and the production information? You or someone else can beef it up to a couple paragraphs afterwards. TTN (talk) 23:22, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- That'd be fine. To tell you the truth I tried to go through it, but I couldn't find a good way to summarize it from what's there. I'd have to watch it again. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 23:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Revert 3
You may also be blocked, you keep reverting when there is no need to - Ben 10: Protector of the EarthYinyanglightningthrash (talk) 10:58, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Three revert rule violation block
I also note that you have included an uncivil edit summary directed at another user. Sam Blacketer (talk) 12:49, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
December, 2007
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of primary characters in Code Lyoko. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
I appreciate your comments over here. It's good to get some level-headed people in there to discuss the whole WP:NOR and its relation to images. Thanks. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
I've started a discussion here over merging the article. With the episode lists and chapter lists drastically increasing in quality, I find that this page is unnecessary, and instead might be targeted for excessive plot details in an AfD and the like. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 08:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Angie Y.
Hello. Given you have communicated with Angie Y. several times, there is currently a conduct RFC on her. See Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Angie Y. 2. If you have a comment, add it if you wish. Thanks. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 01:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- You may want to add evidence, as you are involved in a lot of this. Thanks!, Codelyoko193 (T/C) 01:27, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Help
A friend of mine on YT got hacked, and we have started an investigation, but nothing but dead ends. Any information or redirect to hacker articles would be helpful. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sasuke9031 (talk • contribs) 06:19, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- I know, but we've just been running into dead ends, and thought maybe someone on this end could help. Just answer me this, what's a good hacker article on here. Sasuke9031 (talk) 06:25, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Haku hunternin.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Haku hunternin.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:46, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Keki Genkai - Rinnegan
Why is there nothing on the Rinnegan in the Jutsu page?--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 15:17, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
the SS Free
Hey you work for Wikipedia, can you make a article about the SS Free? I can't because I founded the SS Free back in 2006 and you can't make articles about your own stuff. The SS Free is a major community, we have hundreds of dedicated members. Think of us as the Mozilla of gaming. --Xgmx (talk) 02:39, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
I'll take that as a no.--xgmx (T | C | W)
wtf
Ease up off my back man, its like you stay up all night just to see if I contribute to Wikipedia, and its kinda freaky when you post msgs on my talk page the same second I make or help change an article.--Xgmx (talk) 23:54, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Name
cool, you changed your name, when did that happen?--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 08:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- Huh, I was trying to figure out who you were. You didn't seem new, but I didn't recognize the new username. Guess that's what I get for checking the User Talk page instead of the actual User page... I'll have to commit your new username to memory and give it the respect I gave your old name. What brought on the switch? --GhostStalker(Got a present for ya! | Mission Log) 04:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Haha, it's always fairly easy to recognize the "someguy0830" because of all those reverting-sprees though :p But i like the new nickname! Good job.. Is there a story behind why you particularly chose this name? We are anxious to know! -Twsl (talk) 18:00, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of objects in Bionicle
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of objects in Bionicle, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of objects in Bionicle. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EdEddnEddy.png
Thanks for uploading Image:EdEddnEddy.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Narutokage.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Narutokage.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
*exhales*
Somegu- I mean TRP, I think that your fiascos with Angie Y. are a thing of the past. Thanks!, ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 02:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Editor Review
I've had this thing up since July and only have 3 reviews so can you please review me, good bad, I don't care, speak your mind. Please. And yes Penguins are evil creatures. Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 02:17, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
You said that the person controlling this account has been indef blocked before [1], can you inform me of this user's alternate identity? this is to determine if his current uncivil pattern [2] deserves a extended block, thanks. - Caribbean~H.Q. 10:05, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Naruto shippuden movie
I know its true, but they could of at least have written it better--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 06:01, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Comment
While Angie's views on Jim were POV, the word "respectively" is not. So please put that back. Thanks!, ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 21:52, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- You're right. Thanks!, ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 22:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)