Jump to content

User talk:The Rogue Penguin/Archive3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Then...

What DID happen to Odd? From the machine-subbed Droit Au Couer, it certainly looked like he repeated the year to me. :| ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk | Contribs) 20:37, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Jim just made sure they were separated, nothing more. Odd never had to repeat the year. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 20:38, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Oh, right. I must have really bad memory. ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk | Contribs) 21:20, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
How'd you archive your page?! Teach me please?!!! Also, can you make me an administer> I'll do anything!!! User: Kabuto Yakushi
So, how can I find the path to administering on wikipedia? I wanna block vandals and protect pages from mankind. You seem quite intelligent for a person named Someguy0830. User:Kabuto Yakushi
That won't get you to be an admin. You seem more dangerous than useful. ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk | Contribs) 10:40, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Episodes

We need the French air dates!!! Why did you remove them? And where did you find the info on the rest of the S3 episodes? ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk | Contribs) 10:39, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

In order: no we don't and TV.com, as well as other guide-like sites. The air dates are only relevent to English-speaking countries. We only need the one set of dates. Having two just opens the door for more and more until we're drowning in dates. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 17:16, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
TV.com isn't always a good site to get info from. Don't trust that site. - Noone 17:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Lyoko

Jeremie said "informatic network". Who said internet? Carthage project targeted all electronic communications. And what you wrote means XANA choose one computer and stays here while Jeremie don't find him. But I think Jeremie means XANA is everywhere and nowhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.228.153.3 (talk • contribs)

User:Danmeister

This was in fact a user, see Special:Whatlinkshere/User:Danmeister. The redirect was a result of a bureaucrat renaming this user. The links I mentioned just now should point people to the actual user by his new name so the paper trail doesn't go cold. I hope you check if the redirect is linked to and the result of a bureaucrat renaming before submitting other userpages for deletion. - Mgm|(talk) 08:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello from Lyoko

Hello, Someguy. I, uh, well, you know that I started leaving comments on talkpages around August, and I was wondering when you were going to come and say hello on my page. Having a talkpage that's too long is the least of my worries right now, so you don't have to worry about that. I'll just archive it when my talkpage gets to 26 different conversations. -- Aelita@Lyoko 20:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Ed, Edd n Eddy

Fraud is NOT relevant. Please read the history page and see who really is vandalizing this article. Go back several weeks. I could not find any way to reply to your complaint except here. -- 70.140.219.246 04:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

You need to take a look at the history page for this article, going back about 2 weeks when DietLimeCola first showed up. Then maybe you'll see why I labeled DLC a vandal, and why I did not take a more "cvil" tone. Don't just jump into something like a knight in shning armor without knowing what's going on first. -- 70.140.219.246 14:42, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
You didn't go back far enough. To wit:
"His cow's named Poochy." In the "Jonny" section.
"500."Bro at school"/"No more Ed"" An episode that never aired.
Continually posting that Eddy's last name is "McRich," even though it was explained by several to her (I definitely get the feeling that this is a female) that was roleplaying and wasn't canon.
Continually posting that Jimmy is a homosexual, after several others corrected it.
DietLimeCola freely admitted that the wave of vandalism, and the edit wars resulting, around 12 - 13 September were the work of (himself? herself?) and a group of friends using a single terminal at a public library, and that they did it just to piss off the people who have been monitoring the page, and deleting this kind of crap on an almost daily basis. Ths is documented on the discussion page. There was, and still is, a great deal of doubt in my mind over this claim. I still believe that DLC was using sockpuppets.
I also get the feeling that you are following me around, since you took it upon yourself to delete an addition I made to the "sockpuppets" article describing this very same behavior. This is very common, much more so than you think. I have personally been in public libraries and witnessed this happening. You are not an admin, even though your tone seems to indicate that you think you are. Maybe you are even one of DLC's friends. That would explain your extreme reaction to this situation.
At any rate, DLC has calmed down and is no longer damaging the article, and seems to sincerely have a good attitude about it. I'm willing to leave it at that. -- 70.140.219.246 21:03, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
I have only 7 or so edits with this IP number because I do not have a static IP. I have many edits, but that is neither here nor there. Your reason "I do not go back that far" is a copout, since that is where the problem arose. Case closed. -- 70.140.219.246 21:24, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

deidara and kisame

Deidara: The page you provided does not show Deidara's arm ripped off. We don't see the arm, but we also don't see it ripped off. The sleeve is in the way. Also consider why the arm was torn off but the sleeve wasn't. The fact that he mentions that "only the part around the elbow was lost" means he did NOT lose anything else; hence he kept his left arm. Just not seeing it isn't proof that it was torn off, because we don't see his lost hand after Kakashi's Mangekyou attack either. By your reasoning, Kakashi warped the whole arm from elbow down, which clearly isn't the case.

Kisame: Since when are literal translations given like that? Kirigakure no Kaijin literally means Mysterious Person hidden in mist, and it refers to a monster from the mist village. You cannot choose to keep the literal translation in only part of the term. Either it's Mysterious person hidden in mist, or it's Monster from Hidden Mist. Your own link told that the word Kaijin refers to a humanoid monster, and Kisame is indeed a humanoid monster, so it makes no sense to label him as a "mysterious person". Compare to how we translate Gyokunyo to Virgin and not Jaded Woman which is the literal translation. The fact that HisshouBuraiKen, a well known Naruto translator, changed it should give you a hint at what it's supposed to be. Now stop making childish reverts. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Grrblt (talk • contribs) .

Deidara: No, you can not see it ripped off. The sleeve is in the way so you can't see if it's there or not. They make a point that he cannot use his arm; they never state that it was ripped off. The very page you suggested, chap 249 pg 2, says that Gaara crushed the arm which is different from tearing off the arm. Next page says the same thing. Page 18 of the same chapter, Deidara says his arm was "smashed" and you also see Gaara's sand raining down with no arm in it. So yes, Gaara crushed it into paste, but he did not remove it entirely. Thus it was never reattached. Source: http://devilbox.dead.org/naruto/241-250/249/
Kisame: Hey, ever heard of a synonym? Plus, bakemono means any monster, kaijin means humanoid monster. It says so right on the page you linked. There's also the fact that literal Japanese to English translations are very, very, off and if you had any understanding of kanji you'd know that the literal translation of multi-kanji words is more of an etymology than the actual meaning. Again, see the Virgin ring.
You may not have heard of HBK, byt "my well-known translator" is indeed well-known and held in high regard. See http://forums.narutofan.com/showthread.php?t=134310 and the post by Sho in particular. I call your reverts childish on basis that they directly oppose the word of a known translator, as well as the word of a link that you yourself provided. Grrblt 21:30, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
I'll give you an easy example to illustrate how you are wrong: Somebody kicks Deidara in the groin. Next panel, we don't see his penis, and by the way you're arguing, it would now have been severed from his body. Despite the fact that we don't see it simply because his pants are in the way. We don't see Deidara's left arm, and we don't see the place where Deidara's left arm would normally be. If Deidara still had his arm, it would be inside the sleeve. You cannot draw the conclusion that the arm is missing simply because you don't see it sticking out of his sleeve. Riddle me this: Gaara attacked the arm from outside the clothes. The clothes are still there, yet ripped. Why would the arm be completely severed when the cloth around it was not?
Funny you should say that Pazuzu agrees with you, when basically he's said the same thing as I have. Your other source also did not bother to explain the translation in any depth, hence his words are telling us the same as the first sentence of Kaijin. It literally means mysterious person, but that's not what it's used for. Akatsuki Leader is a very mysterious person, no one in their right mind would label him a Kaijin (based on the assumption that he's no monster, of course). It is a word to signify a monster. It cannot get any simpler than that. I'll try to illustrate this as easy as possible: 日本国 literally translates into, roughly, "country that is the source of the sun". However, it is also the official name of Japan; hence we should translate it to Japan and not to "country that is the source of the sun". Despite the fact that Japan is not the literal translation, 日本国 is only used to describe Japan. This is how Japanese kanji works! A literal translation of a word is scarcely ever the best one, and it certainly is not the best in this case because Kisame is not very mysterious. And you have still not replied to why the rings aren't translated literally much as you wish to do with Kaijin. Jaded Woman is an expression that describes a virgin, but Gyokunyo does not translate to virgin. Your views on translations have rather glaring inconsistensies (unless of course you want to change the ring's name to Jaded Woman, in which case it would lose all meaning to English readers).
Furthermore, your ignorance of Narutoforums is quite appalling; it is independent from Narutofan in all but name and the posters are not hired to promote misinformation. Disregarding that thread because it's hosted on Narutofan servers is like disregarding science essays because they are written by people who live in a capitalist country. These are the people that create the translations you read, and they think HBK is one of the best. Pazuzu is another such member. Yet he was hardly mentioned, if at all, on that thread I linked earlier.
You told me not to call your reverts childish unless I provided something other than a random name, which I then did. If you did not want me to call them childish at all, that was hardly the proper course of action. Grrblt 00:00, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Grease

In the film, Grease what is the name of the shiny red roadster that Danny and Sandy flew off from the carnival in the end? --PJ Pete

Shino Aburame

If their battle was a draw, then Choji's battle with Jirobo would have been a draw since they both fainted, Neji and Kidmaru would have been a draw since even they both fainted. Then Kabuto and Naruto's battle would be a win for Kabuto since Naruto fell from the effects of Rasengan first. Just like Choji's, Shino won the battle since they were both knocked out yet everyone considers Choji to be the winner --Blazing Kusanagi

How would it be a double knockout if Kankuro falls first, and Kabuto doesn't die. Plus Karasu beat Kurama ever though he died in Yu Yu Hakusho. By the way, do you know when the third movie is coming out? --Blazing Kusanagi
Look, I already know...that draws can exist. Plus, I'm not obsessed with him winning or anything, I just wrote down what I believe (and still think) is right. You still haven't convinced me and I still think it's not a draw, but since we came to a conclusion, let's drop it. --Blazing Kusanagi

Re:

I was thinking the same thing. After all, the recent joint use of Kabuto and Dragonball on List of ninjutsu in Naruto (S-Z) is clearly an attempt to "give the impression of more support for a viewpoint", which is a no no. Do you think we should make a topic here, or should we just put some templates on his various Talk Pages? ~SnapperTo 22:58, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Ok then. But who would you say is a sockpuppet of who? Kabuto has been used more over the past month, but Dragonball is the original account. ~SnapperTo 23:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Just to make sure I'm understanding things correctly, you'd say Dragonball is the "Sockpuppet master" and that Kabuto is the sockpuppet? ~SnapperTo 23:19, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Sweat drop! Michiganotaku 23:33, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Lyoko

Why did you revert the information about Taelia? I questioned the scenarist, she confirmed we'll never see Taelia again!

Of course I use poor word. As a native english speaker, maybe you could improve my sentences. I said I interview one of the scenarists. Didn't you understood I'm french?
Sophie Decroisette explained sometimes on french forums there was no linear storyline in season 1. Every episode was independant. You can verify it by yourself, can't you? That's why Taelia won't be seen again.
And for XANA: didn't you listen the first season 3 episode? Jérémie spoke about "global informatic network". Who said internet?
Not sure it's the same thing. It would be interessting to know if XANA can access CIA computers (isolated from internet), for exemple.
I never post lies. We asked the scenarist why they give life points to monsters if all heroes can do "one-shot kill". She replies she has some friends who are RPG fans.
Well, if you want to check all the informations she gave... http://www.catsuka.com/interf/forum/viewtopic.php?t=778&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=150
She is S.

Naruto

So I made a mistake - I thought they were changing it to push it towards the Jiraiya Naruto entry rather than the folk hero. Yeesh! KenshinSayAra? 02:36, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

?

In the edit history for Lyoko Minus One, my rather long-winded edits violated this conept you mentioned called "KISS". What is KISS? --Jeremie@theLab 14:49, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

All right, thanks for helping me out on that one. I'll just add internal links and such to the recaps instead of massive details. Thank you! --Jeremie@theLab 17:38, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Omnitrix

I may be dumb but I don't get by what you mean; "Byproduct of strength?" in the wildvines thing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.214.242.132 (talk • contribs) .

Hi

I can link all and any words I want when I speak with others with what I type on my talk page. Okay? There's no real rule about it. Dragonball1986 20:32, 12 October 2006 (UTC) I link what I want.

68.228.177.41

Hi. What can we do about this jerk who keeps deleting the Ben 10 episodes page?--Salvax (Speak on me | What I did)

How do you report something like this, and how do you block a user? Is there a specific page where these things are done? Would you mind giving me that info...?--Salvax (Speak on me | What I did)--22:04, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Capitalization

I noticed that all my superfluous capitalizations are in the process of being reverted. I'm fine with that, because I understand your position. But I feel that I must clarify for you why I bothered to do all that in the first place. I just thought that because of an object's relation with Lyoko made it special and distinguished it from an earthly counterpart. For example, I felt that because of its special function, a tower on Lyoko was special from a tower on Earth, and hence deserved proper recognition with a capitalized letter. But if this was all wrong, I get it and I can help revert my own edits.  Jeremie@theLab 

Dragonball1986

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Vercalos 04:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Asuma's Death

Has that chapter already been released in japan? I haven't found it in English.--Vercalos 03:35, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

I just wondered because people kept posting Asuma died after chapter 327.--Vercalos 04:10, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Code Lyoko

Hello

I've a question: didn't anyone requested all episodes pages to be suppressed? In the francophone wikipedia, a page for one episode of a TV show is immediatly erased.

I added "Men in black" i the secondary characters. I added Network in the "Lyoko" article. I know it's not a Lyoko sector, but it's a virtual fight sector. The only other option is creating a whole article for the Network. Do you think we need it? 160.228.152.6 16:11, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

reversion of list of monsters (code lyoko)

I added that megatanks made more regular appearances in season three. If you reveiw the episodes, this is true. I'm not saying they aren't rare, I'm just saying they started to appear more. Maybe we can work out an agreement to find a way to fit this into the article. Bobcheezy 22:16, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Personal Attacks

I wouldn't have any reason to attack you if you weren't being a jerk. I have every right to debate over the topic.72.78.226.57 19:53, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

William as a warrior

So, you need a picture to trust Tchoucky?

I understand your revert, but I found it a shame waiting the pictures to put infos about new armors. I hope I'll have a picture soon.
About the network, we'll never agree on this point. You see, the Strategic Air Commands computers are isolated from the internet for obvious reasons. And I think XANA can acess to these computers.
Question about gender: english speaker use "it" for non-thinking robots, and "he" for the ones who have a personnality, "she" if the robot is obviousy female (like in Terminator 3), right? So we can use "he" for XANA.
One of my friends will ask the writers why they have switch from "Jérémie" to "Jérémy". But if you write "ie", you have to use "é" too (except if you write in CAPITALS). I know, not easy to write with a non-French keyboard.
For the question "is Ulrich German", honnestly, I don't trust codelyoko.fr. They wrote once Taelia was Aelita's defective clone. 160.228.152.6 22:22, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

An un named member of Heatblast's speices (Grudgematch)

why did you delet my mention of this factual camo aperence??HHS.student

Code Lyoko Compromise

It'd be nice to have my hand in some kind of contribution here that wasn't always changed back by someone else. Wikipedia is a place to freely edit pages, given that the person doesn't make a mockery or drastically altering the information. Yet its a mockery of someone's hard work, to see it revised back completely just because someone likes their own words compared to others. I see your name in almost every aspect of a Code Lyoko section, as you obviosuly watch the edits like a hawk. I appreciate your motivation to do this and thank you for your efforts. All I ask is you to compromise and let others have their say, allowing credit to go where its due. I know you cant do this with all people, because some changes made are just stupid. I just wanted readers to know things and ask questions. like, 'how many life points does the Scyphozoa have?' or 'why havent they ever gone after it?' for a mission. I'll just go to the talk page for this though. I dont have time to fight nor do I want to. Yet its just redundant to see what I spent time on to be in vain.

SoundPound500000/6000

I am so sorry big time, 6000 is me but just my back up username and I messed up big time on the name.

Was I right

Do you think it was right of me to fix the Sasuke Uchiha article and did you think it was crappy too. Do you think I did a good job for my first artcle fix?Sam ov the blue sand 03:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Naruto Geography

You're acting like a child just as much as I am. If it's such a small and insignicant word, why do you feel the need to keep changing it? Don't expect me to give in to petty little insults like that, i'll keep changing it as long as you do. Renegade78 22:59, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

I've stated my reasons for using the word "only" many times. I don't understand why you hate this word so much. He's ONLY appeared in the anime. Do you disagree with that? If not, I don't understand why the hell you don't feel that word should be included. Renegade78 23:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
"Let me also address this. "Raiga and Zabuza were killed in the Raiga filler arc and the Wave Country arc, respectively." Do you know what respectively means? Obviously not, or you wouldn't have said that. Read before commenting."
I missed the mention of Wave Country when I initially read it, my bad. Renegade78 23:16, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

"You're only adding it to have your way."

I'm adding it to make it more decicive. It doesn't make the sentance awkward at all. It goes fine with it. What the fuck is with you and this word? Just leave it in, stop being such a bitch. Renegade78 23:21, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

"This "only" nonsense does not make any difference towards the character or the country."

As you've already mentioned, not everybody knows what filler means. Adding the word "only" to the sentance is a better indication that he's absent from the manga. Renegade78 23:21, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

"Adding even more verbose annoyances does not help. It just encourages similar behavior everywhere else. Small mentions that don't exclude possibilites is how it's written. Don't try to limit options to fit with your views."

My edit doesn't exclude possibilities either. It just states that as of now, he's only an anime filler character. If he ever gets mentioned in the manga, feel free to state otherwise. Renegade78 23:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

I did. It explains he is a filler character, but not everybody who sees him in the Naruto Geography article is going to click on him. All my edit does is add a tiny bit of info that will help people understand where he stands in the series. The statement doesn't exclude anything, it simply states that AS OF NOW, he's a character only in the anime. If the statement said "Raiga is a character that has appeared only in the anime and will never appear or be mentioned in the manga", then maybe it would be exlusory, but that's not the case. Renegade78 23:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

"Must you argue about the slightest change? It notes its not in the manga. What's your problem now?"

I was just about to say the same to you. Renegade78 00:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

"I'm tired of fighting with you, so I won't change what you've altered. You're still being too damn obsessive over this, though. Do you simply not remember all the other things you been reverted over? I have the fault of encouraging such stupidity on both our parts, but I'm telling you to stop. Three reverts, no more. Please don't repeat such a pointless parade of nonsense on an article. You've done it multiple times now. Just read through your own contributions."

If i'm guilty of parading nonsense, so are you. You were making just as big of a deal over it as I was. Regarding your comments on my edits being reverted and what-not; I hardly ever even edit wiki, so I don't know where this is coming from. Renegade78 00:12, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

You reverted just as many times as I did. I'm no more at fault than you are. Renegade78 01:49, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Tower Codes (Resolved)

EDIT AGAIN: Makes sense. Now, are you a moderator on the official Code Lyoko Forum? I wanna see if you're the same guy. That's be weird if you are... --Demonkiller of Lyoko 04:21, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

PS: Yes, I am on the official Code Lyoko forum. I'm that guy. --Demonkiller of Lyoko 04:21, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Kakashi

Can you state the manga chapter or data book page where it states that Hatake kakashi was made a jonnin because they lacked jonnins.Iorinyc 22:09, 3 November 2006 (UTC) iorinyc.

I have read the manga chapter several times and it is stated that konoha lacked military power and no where it's stated that they passed Kakashi becasue they lacked jonnins. So, it's your assumption and not the author's word.Iorinyc 22:25, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
If you want to fight it's fine because i'm a anime freak and been watching and reading naruto since 2001.Also the 4th states that they are going to split up because konoha military is low and it say nothing about kakashi becoming a jonnin due to military shortage. So, until you can prove me wrong i will have to delete you post. Sorry.Iorinyc 23:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

You're the only person that wants it deleted. And yes, I'm familiar with the rules, are you? You might want to reread that section yourself. Next time you have a problem take it the the article's discussion page. Like I said, if you want the list gone, I'd be glad to give it its own article, but it's not going away completely. NIVINCo 00:54, 4 November 2006

Oh, and I figure I'll also note the fact that expired videos are listen in italics. NIVINCo 00:58, 4 November 2006

Re: WP:NOT

I read the entire thing. I think we're dealing with a probalem that is very much more subjective than it is objective. So, I suggest if you really believe that the list shouldn't be in this article, then I'll take care of it. So, do you really bealieve that the list shouldn't be on the page? NIVINCo 01:12, 4 November 2006

Don't touch any article I'm editing for at least an hour. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NIVINCo (talk • contribs) .

Do you have any idea how many times I mentioned that I would just make a new page, and you bring up your objection now? NIVINCo 01:38 EST, 4 November 2006

But I never agreed with you. It's important information. NIVINCo 01:43 EST, 4 November 2006

Listen, a list is information. Type in "List of" into a Wikipedia search. Either sign all of them up for deletion, or don't try to delete any of them, including mine. NIVINCo 01:49 EST, 4 November 2006

I just wanted to let you know that I will be away from the computer for the next few hours. I suppose we'll continue the dispute at that point. NIVINCo 01:53 EST, 4 November 2006

?

What do you mean "creating userpages for users who don't exist?" Have I done such a thing? Where? —comment added by Power level (Dragon Ball)(t/c)

I redirected Sasuke-kun to it's proper way (since I misspelled it on my edit summary) and User:Chris Griswold to User:ChrisGriswold if that's what you meant. Is that not allowed? Power level (Dragon Ball) 20:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
What if I misspelled their names on edit summaries? That was my case for creating those redirects in the first place, to remove the red links. Those can't be corrected, only by an administrator, which I'm not. – Power level (Dragon Ball) (T | C) 20:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Since you're puttin' up speedies...

Can you speedy delete all of the other accounts which aren't being used by me anymore, such as User:Dragonball1986, User:Kabuto Yakushi, User:Someguy0380, and speedy User:Dragonbal1986, which, I admit, was accidentally created on my part. Give it your all! – Power level (Dragon Ball) (T | C) 21:01, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Grim Tales from Down Below

Oi, you better be careful. You might be above the 3 revert rule. Though at this rate so will the other person.
Ivvan Cain 21:49, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

My Warning

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plot_of_Naruto_I&diff=prev&oldid=85902386 I believe this was the edit I got warned about. Yeah, I just did it to make a point. What the hell is Naruto Plot have to do with an encyclopedia? Anyways, I won't edit anymore. This place is getting out of hand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.247.169.45 (talk • contribs)

Micah Sanders

Please do not remove maintenance notices from pages unless the required changes have been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Thank you.

There's a lot of ambiguity in his powers. When D.L. picked up the phone, you couldn't tell if it was working or not anymore. Unless the character's powers are indicated by NBC, the writers, cast, etc.... its is still original research. --Madchester 01:05, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

THAT'S THE THING!

I wasn't sure whether to place that template or not, but I just wanted to get the message straight, know what I mean? Power level (Dragon Ball) 01:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

You know, you're a lucky guy...

You know so much, I guess you're gonna make administership any time soon. Power level (Dragon Ball) 02:29, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Can you help me on that nuisance of an IP's talk page, I can't seem to get my name right in that box... Power level (Dragon Ball) 02:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
For the IP person, I'm trying to complete it to "as you did to User:Power level (Dragon Ball), it is considered vandalism..." Can you help me on that? Power level (Dragon Ball) 03:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Proof

Prove to me that informing people about the ledgend of the tailed beast is harmful to the artical, and I will stop. it does add to the artical for people to know where they insperation came from. I will stop the editing of it for now, and will not continue if you find ANY reasonable proof that this harms, or takes away from the artical. And I believe someone commented in the discussions that Toby said it was "turtle like". that doesn't make it a turtle. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ShinjiNoBaka (talk • contribs) .

compromise

Would you atleast mind if I ADD the information, as oppose to take anything out, such as tacking on "possibly a shark" after "turtle-like" on creature type, and that Kisame's sword is named after something pretaining to the 3 tail beast? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ShinjiNoBaka (talk • contribs) .

what do you mean there is no "three tailed shark"? It is an established legend. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ShinjiNoBaka (talk • contribs) .

Um...

I thought that Might Guy was the strongest Jonin in Konohagakure , not Enoki (Kakashi) from the "manga databooks" as it says so on his ability section. – Power level (Dragon Ball) (Don't talk to me! - kidding... | I'm innocent, I didn't do it! - kidding) 17:38, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Do not edit the contents of Archived past discussions

Please see Wikipedia:How_to_archive_a_talk_page#Disadvantages. I think you'll see that you are not allowed to edit an archive of anyone's in anyway. You may only leave comments or any other appropiate edits at a talk page. §Power level (Dragon Ball) 20:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Make sure you follow Wikipedia:Civil

I do not mean to cause offense but your recent edit to User_talk:Power level (Dragon Ball) was in violation to 'Not belittling contributors because of their language skills or word choice' or similiar.

I understand why you are angry but please be careful what you say.

Best wishes :), Yuser31415 talk|contribs 20:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Have a look at the bottom of my talk page. Yuser31415 talk|contribs 00:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Megawhat?

Where is your proof that Megawatt is a new alien? P.S. i spelled it Megawhat on purpouse.HHS.student

Can you teach me stuff then?

I have to ask, how is it that you know so much about Wikipedia and I don't? Did you really read every single rule on this English website? Are you a sock of a disguised administrator (Please tell me honestly)? If so, can you send me a list of rules, policies, etc., that can help me acknowledge myself then? I don't mean to be uncival, but you seem to be cold-hearted at times not only to me, but to several other new/old Wikipedians. Perhaps I can help you change that? How 'bout it? You help me familiarize with Wikipedia's policies and rules, and I'll help you be more calmer and more open-minded to people. Let's be partners?! Answer below here... :} —Preceding unsigned comment added by Power level (Dragon Ball) (talk • contribs)

Quick request

Could you just take a look at the arguement between CaveatLector and I, and tell me if I'm really acting in bad faith and/or acting juvenile? I'm pretty sure I'm not, but I want to make sure. You don't have to be involved, I just want a quick comment. Nemu 02:23, 11 November 2006 (UTC)‎

Cool, thanks. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't coming off harsh without realizing it. Nemu 02:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Dethklok

Im just curious as to why you deleted my addition to the Metalocalypse page about the Illuminati group. I thought it was a good addition, seeing as they finally give some background and a name for Mr. Sentcia.DerMetzger 07:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Television

Hi Someguy0830,

(The other format reduces the dependence on |. IBest to rely on just one widely used template.)
(All the comments are fairly unnecessary as well)

Suggest your revert overlooks the possibility that folk referring to this template's code may appreciate the greater transparency and ease of navigation offered by the wikicoded version. {{!}} and its variants soon understood. Regards, David Kernow (talk) 09:22, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:3RR at List of Naruto episodes

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

-- Szvest Wiki me up ® 13:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: 65.172.235.249

I've taken care of it. // Pilotguy (Cleared to land) 22:50, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Grim Tales from Down Below nominated for deletion

An article that you have been involved in editing, Grim Tales from Down Below, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powerpuff Girls Doujinshi (second nomination). Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. --Slowking Man 11:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Jounin

Well, it depends whether you mean the English or Japanese version. I checked out a few sites (narutochaos and leafninja) the refer to the japanese version and then I went to the official site (Naruto.com) and found out that it's Jounin in the Japanese version and Jonin in the English version.

I think there should be a discussion as to whether we want the Naruto article to contain more of the influence of the Japanese version or the English version.

Thank you for pointing that at for me.

-Benpercent

Image:Hotpants.jpg

I don't quite understand what I need to do to keep the image. I've read the tag but don't get it. What do I have to do Someguy? Power level (Dragon Ball) 02:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I placed the tag... Can you start the discussion on it's talk page? I don't know what to say. Power level (Dragon Ball) 02:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Should I change the license tag then? (Am I allowed?) Power level (Dragon Ball) 02:52, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Capital letters

In English all words in proper noun titles, such as an episode title, except for articles, conjunctions, and prepositions less than five letters long, are capitalized. The word "is" is a verb and is always capitalized in titles, regardless of whether the original author did so. Jay32183 23:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Naruto

See this reference desk discussion about titular and eponymous. --Wirbelwindヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 02:40, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Naruto_kekkei_genkai

Hey, I just edited the article and you reverted a change I made. Can you explain why? That sentence does not make any sense at all grammatically, and I don't know what you are trying to say with it. Thanks. Hobbeslover talk/contribs 05:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Good work, nice collaborative effort. Hobbeslover talk/contribs 05:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to Naruto

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Someguy0830! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, and try to reinsert the link again. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 02:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Really?

Are you sure that Gaara's Bijuu cannot control sand? I thought he could since it was he himself that protected Gaara with sand. So wouldn't that count? Benpercent 01:02, 23 November 2006 (UT)

Hmm....Me and my friend we're discussing that the other day. We both thought that was the reason why Gaara was insane.
Doesn't he lose his "auto protection" after the demon is extracted?--Benpercent 01:17, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
The clarification is appreciated.--Benpercent 01:36, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Hurrican Chronicles

Eeep. Sorry. I copy and pasted the anon's spelling from the talk page. –Gunslinger47 19:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Chakra

Where is the chakra article you memtioned before?Sam ov the blue sand 05:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Quit deleting everything after 5 seconds...it takes time to put a new article together. there is tons of information on Chakra in naruto. Sam is editing the 8 page article one of two I gave him to create the page. it's worth the wait photoguy 06:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Say when

Please for now on when I'm getting out of hand just say when and I promise I will stop at that moment.Sam ov the blue sand 22:52, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Raiga is filler

Raiga kurosaki is anime filler and should not be listed as a member of the 7 swordsmen of the hidden mist. If you are going add him to Kisames profile (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akatsuki_%28Naruto%29#Kisame_Hoshigaki) Make sure you clearly state that he exists in the anime only and is not a part of the manga (the real story) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Apackof12ninjas (talk • contribs) .

why

You know now that I think of it you have never shown me any respect ever since I got here. I've contributed alot to Wikipedia you know. Another thing show me one time we've been on the same side of a disscussion. And at least I'm offering to help Xeago unlike you, you never wanted to help me when I was new. Wait just a second now you said I "usally" don't have a good arguement that means you think I have had at least one good arguement which one is it then (please give me a link) wow so you do respect me (just a little). Do you respect me (just a little)?Sam ov the blue sand 04:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: substing

Good point, wasn't aware of that possibility, I'll do that from now on. Treima 04:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Taijutsu

That's really odd. I seem to have replaced the whole article with an old version of List of Colombian flags, which makes absolutely no sense. I'm not even sure I knew Colombia was a country until now. Oh well, you seemed to have reverted it almost instantly so no harm done. ~SnapperTo 23:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

The Necromonger's Way for deletion

Hey, you're that dude that added all of that information on the Necromongers from info on the nover. Since there arent any references stated on the page, its gonna get deleted. If you can, find out a way to cite the novel as a reference. BishopTutu 07:49, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Naruto names FAQ

Wow, thanks for rewriting much of the FAQ. I came up with it when I was staying up one night, thus why it wasn't well thought out at first. I knew it needed rewriting to specify some of the points, but I didn't expect to get to until until much of my other concerns (school, mainly) were finished up. You managed to better explain most of what I wanted to say there. Again, thanks. NeoChaosX (he shoots, he scores!) 18:34, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Vandal tags

Thank you for reverting vandalism on Wikipedia!

Be sure to put warning tags on the vandal's user talk page (such as {{subst:test}}, {{subst:test2}}, {{subst:test3}}, {{subst:test4}}). Add each of these tags on the vandal's talk page, in sequential order, after each instance of vandalism. Adding warnings to the talk page assists administrators in determining whether or not the user should be blocked. If the user continues to vandalize pages after you add the {{subst:test4}} tag, request administrator assistance at Request for Intervention. Again, thank you for helping to make Wikipedia better. Bushcarrot 03:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Metalocalypse

Just wanted to say thanks for working hard to keep this page clean of crap.

WikiMetal supports you on this. --Ryouga 04:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Dragon World

Please see Talk:Dragon World dispute for your vote on whether we should keep the Human (Dragon World) article or have it merged into Dragon World. Thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 16:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Human (Dragon Ball)

Well, how 'bout instead of removing content off a page, why not modify it? I could really use your help man, and for as long as I've known you, you do make a difference when you edit content on Wikipedia. Besides, I really feel that there's loads of stuff you can add to the article. So, how long has it been since you've seen Dragon Ball anyways? Your friend, Power level (Dragon Ball) 02:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I don't get a word of what you just said on my talk page. Can you speak American English instead of Albert Einstien to me this time? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Power level (Dragon Ball) (talk • contribs)
Rather than abruptly merge the Human (Dragon Ball) after a few days, why not help me add more content to it? Power level (Dragon Ball)

thanks

Yeah, I went to fix it but it was already fixed, so thanks, also thanks for the umm thing. Oh, the word principal. I only just finished the Ep then but do you think that the vision was more symbolic than literal? WookMuff 07:46, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Well, everyone was in their uniforms, cept hiro and ando, but iguess they don't have uniforms really, but nathan was politician guy, and matt was cop guy, and claire was cheerleader gal, and umm i am sure i noticed others, anyway
ooh, simone and mohinder were the only ones there without powers, that we know of. Also, everyone there was alive, but i guess none of the main characters have died so thats not that significant... nevermind, it just felt very symbolic to me, very umm... parable? i don't know the word, but more symbol than real. Also, i am wondering if peters visions have something to do with indian dreamer kid... WookMuff 10:35, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Just a question

No offense (I start all posts with this now to avoid conflicts), did you see my post before editing Kakashi Hatate (I spelled it wrong) or did you do it on your own. You could have told me that you did that on the talk page instead of leaving me wondering.Sam ov the blue sand 00:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

You know what, I just looked at the time table and was about to get rid of this and got as far as your user page before you answered me. Well I guess great minds think alike. Sorry for wasting your time.Sam ov the blue sand 00:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
New question, are you seeking adimship, it seems you are. Nice banner can I use it, too late already added it, thanks.Sam ov the blue sand 22:18, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Well I guess I was wrong. I didn't see the banner in the commons when I was last looking there, is it new?Sam ov the blue sand 22:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Sasori

Sasori's age must be a least 40 since he left the Sand > 20 years ago (after having killed the 3rd) His face is >= 16 also, with the his height and the fact that he had been skilled enough to turn himself into a puppet, he couldn't be younger. Don't U understand what 'early teens' mean??? (means your own opinion,then) Appreciate your individualism but disagree, may you give reason for yr standpoint?

How did u know sasori left his village in his teens, not when he was <13 or >19? Hm, did u guess?


When did Chiyo state that? I only see in ch266 that she mentioned "the same as so long ago" Sasori didn't leave the Sand EXACTLY 20 years ago, it could have been MORE or MUCH MORE, how do U know it wasn't 23 or 26 years etc, for example, and Kankuro did talk about the "more than 20 years ago" in chapter 251 In addition, Sasori looks more a grown-up than a child, so he could only be JUST under 20 (he couldn't possibly be so small) if not older . So it maybe like this: Sasori was just under 20 when he left, and more than 20 years later he reappeared => this could make him in his forties (or older), not impossible like U think it is. I think his age may range from 38 to 48. There's not been any accurate info given about Sasori's age, no way we can conclude his accurate age, you must be estimating. Still, it should be safer to say he's in his forties. Well, not to mention that he could have turned into a puppet a few years before leaving his village, he told none and none had figured out that he didn't age for a few years, etc things like that, if that the case it's reasonable to estimate that he's >= 40 Arhugefan 11:04, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Top templates

Aren't (top) templates supposed to be standardized? That's what I did for InuYasha and Naruto. What's wrong with the dablinks and simply stating that "Such and such" redirects here? --Power level (Dragon Ball) 20:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

I finally understand now about the redirect thing. Then why did you change this:here? I didn't start that "Such and such" redirects here, as clearly seen. I did remove that (character) thing though, as it wasn't needed. So, answer my question. I'm waiting...--Power level (Dragon Ball) 20:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
So, can I revert your InuYasha article and make it a dablink by having it how it was before [without that horrendous "(character)" which is uneeded and having the title charc. thingy by it? ~--Power level (Dragon Ball) 20:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

not anymore

You deleted my note -- (This episode is sometimes listed erroniously in TV listings as Dr. Animo and the Mutant Boy.)

Your comment was "not anymore." Wrong. The last time it was on, the COMCAST guide still listed the title as Mutant Boy, not Mutant Ray. -- Jason Palpatine 00:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

I will not argue -- only talk. I was meerly noting a fact. I have had the utmost respect in regards to your judgement. So, please, don't be offended if I offer you an oservation. I am not reverting the edit -- which should tell you something. Please calm down. But it's still a fact. Sei-la-vee. -- Jason Palpatine 00:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Update -- cableguide lists and the Mutant Boy as airing again next week. They're still at it. Jason Palpatine 16:34, 9 December 2006 (UTC)


Akatsuki (Naruto)

could you please edit Itachi Uchiha? I'd love to help you out, but the newly revised article is too long for my attention span. ;p--Sphinxridd 19:22, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Could please stop deleting my post about how some of the member might have change during the course of the two and a half years.

When you look closely at the last panel in chapter 238 you can tell that some of the members then does not match the members now. Other than Itachi, Kisame, Zetsu, Sasori and Leader, we cannot be sure if the other members got changed. I am not saying that I am 100% true, I am just saying people should keep their mind open.

Temari's image

Could you please check that again?Arhugefan 02:28, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Wrong prejudice on Kakuzu

You SHOULDN'T write that "Kakuzu is very greedy, only doing what is necessary to earn money...". It's just your own prejudice on Kakuzu. You should take into consideration that:

  1. Kakuzu is not greedy. "Greedy" is a word refered to chracteristic of somebody who does everything that can make profit to him or he'll get something for his own through that action. What kakuzu has demostrated are not that kind among the definition of "greedy". He only has a strong desire for money, money is something merely of his hobby. We don't know exactly what he gets from the money he earns. If the money really serves for his own demand, then it'll mean that he's "greedy". You should differentiate between the "desire" and "greed". The "obvious greed" you say later is more nonsense.
  2. You write that he "only doing what is necessary to earn money'??? That's so unfair. Kakuzu loves money, but for him, duty comes first. It's he who urged Hidan to leave the battlefield although Asuma cost a lot of money. In chapter 333, Hidan has recommended to go to the bounty station but Kakuzu refused to accomplish his duty. Kakuzu often doing what is necessary to earn money, not only. Please don't apply your own idea on the character. Causesobad (talk * contribs) 10:15, 10 December 2006 (UTC).

You should remmeber he attacked Asuma or Asuma attacked him first? Just a coincidence that Asuma was a huge bounty and of course he must take the chance, it's both for his duty and his desire.Causesobad 10:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

OK, first I must talk to you again that Money is his desire. When you like something, you often reconcile it with the thing you like. For example, you love Bill Clinton, you will quote his quotions in your speeches; or you love wikipedia as you second career, you may talk to other: " this info from wikipedia..." something like that. Second, Asuma attacked Kakuzu, it's normal that Kakuzu gave him a counterattack. Kakuzu would be stupid to get that huge money, also an enemy out of hand. => In conclusion, he's not greedy, it's just his desire.Causesobad 10:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

"Asuma did not attack Kakuzu. No one attacked him. Kotetsu suggests doing so as a plan and that's it. Kakuzu makes the first move." => Is it normal if you see your enemy right in front of your face and you just ignore them and say: "Please go away" (!!!!). I don't deny that Kakuzu attacked that monk for money as one of the reasons, but about Kakashi and Asuma, just only by haphazard, Kakuzu himself didn't have intention beforehand of attacking them for money. Kakuzu and Hidan are on the way to do their missions, and we don't know exactly the targets will be the bounty or not(both 2 situations happen with Asuma team and Kakashi team making the countercheck, not Kakuzu or Hidan)Causesobad 13:36, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

By the way, I don't agree with your statement "arranging goals". He didn't arrange all those rencontres, it happened by chance and he just made the most of it do fulfill his desire as the second resort.Causesobad 13:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Greedy - excessively desirous of wealth, profit, etc. All I can say is "durrr...." Really, what the hell is your argument about? Did you just pick something random to rant about? Nemu 13:55, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Ahem .... what's the argument about. It sounds so silly .... Why not discuss it on the page of the article in question, so that more people can submit their input? Cheers, Yuser31415 19:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
(to someguy0830) I know you have the prehistory of stubbornness and rigidity. I also know you more experience than most of us here. But it doesn't mean that you only tie up to your own idea and despise other contribution. I don't have so much time to while away to revamp narrowly every line like you, so just reconsider the information of your own and one thing I want to say is that I don't respect and trust the precision of your info.Causesobad 08:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Naruto the Movie: Snow Princess' Book of Ninja Arts

Hi Someguy0830. Have you seen Naruto the Movie: Snow Princess' Book of Ninja Arts? I thought the first paragraph was a general overview of the movie, but I haven't seen the movie, so it made sense to me. Hopefully someone can write a decent summary to replace the existing one. ~MDD4696 04:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

I just read the talk page. I appreciate it, thanks. ~MDD4696 04:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

About season 4

I understand you had to rewrite it, but it's RepliKa in the article, not RepliCa. Another point: Replikas are described as "islands on the digital sea", not the internet. The article isn't fully reliable, but please don't change the infos. Barraki 11:44, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

My point was that shouldn't Yuser's comment have been on your talk page (since the person was speaking to you and not me)? If you want, I'll copy/paste it here... --Power level (Dragon Ball) 20:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Some thanks. Ther is only one thing I worry about: maybe we'll have to be more careful, the magazine is not fully relyable (can we trust someone who call William the 6th warrior? Jeremie isn't a warrior!). One small info (useless on the pages): "Replika" doesn't exist in French neither in English, but it exists in German. So, let's not speculate with this. Barraki 22:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I know. But we used to find a lot of mistakes in the magazines. I hate when we have only one source. Barraki 22:27, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Naruto & Stumbling on Happiness

how many out there belong to the overlapping universe of Naruto fans and Stumbling on Happiness readers? --Sphinxridd 20:57, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

never mind then...heh, u edited the Daniel Gilbert (psychologist), the author's page. so i thought you knew who he is or has read his book. --Sphinxridd 23:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Huh? Jason Palpatine 05:11, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, that's what I thought. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 05:12, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

yes it is relivant

LOL any ways look up rebuild of evangelion they are 4 new animated movies one will be diretced by anno and the others will be directed by his Protégé (the guy who did FLCL) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebuild_of_Evangelion im donkey punch excited well anyways have a good life and listen to Finntroll and see the new evasBobthehun2 05:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Introduction

The placement of the particular facts are incorrect. The current "introduction" in no way serves to properly introduce the objects or their purpose within the show.Nagrom7 16:24, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

If you quote me on style should i quote you on the 3rr? The plot coupon portion DOES NOT belond in the introduction of the objects. This page is not focused on plot conventions but on the contextual qualities of the objects themselves. Nagrom7 16:31, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

To let you know...

I wasn't editing for the sake of it. I just thought that less space would be a better ultimatum. Please quit saying that. Power level (Dragon Ball) 18:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Flawed Logic?

You're just a nightmare. Brass(wrong) The object sublimates manganese a component of brass. Listing brass means that the object would not vaporize steel or another component with manganese. Sci-fi.com lists it's use as manganese, reguardless of what a characters interpretation of the item might be. I think we've seen that Karl is not a credible source for Object information. Collectors vault use does not qualify as an effect of the object. Should we list the eye as "used to vaoprize the henchmen?" or the key as "Helps Joe travel alot of places without walking?" Nagrom7 22:31, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Effect and use are two totally different things. The page is not about the USES of objects, it is about their effect. The objects practical application in reguards to unlocking the vault simply does not DOES NOT apply. Any use of the object within the show could be shown on the list, however it is not. Nagrom7 04:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

vote stacking

whats wrong with what im doing? hmmmmm nothing and kreepy much does not seem like you dont give a fuck —the preceding comment was added by Bobthehun2 (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) Please sign your posts on talk pages!

Comments like this are likely to get you blocked for incivility, Bobthehun2. And please consider changing your username; 'Hun' was a slang word for a German. Yuser31415 22:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Happy Hanukkah

HappyHanukkah

Happy Hanukkah Someguy I know you're not Jewish but I am so I feal like spreading the Hanukkah feeling. Thanks for showing me the ropes around Wiki.Sam ov the blue sand 23:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

I need help

How do you put a personal attack warning on someone's page this guy dissed me on somebody's page and isn't man enough to say it to my face!Sam ov the blue sand 01:04, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Hey I'm thinking of archiving my page every 25 topics and I'm 2 away so how do you archive talk pages?Sam ov the blue sand 01:10, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Hey I read the entire thing and I've tried but I don't get how still. Do you have time to explain or (possibly) do it for me?Sam ov the blue sand 01:53, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!Sam ov the blue sand 02:01, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Needimage

Template:Needimage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --32X 16:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Man enough to say it to your face

Thanks for destroying all of the work I put into the Objects from the Lost Room talk page. Much appreciated. I reviewed the wikipedia talk page help and couldn't find any discussion on the "rules" of chronological order. There is only a very brief discussion about formatting (basically how to indent). So that brings me to the question: Why change everything around if there are no rules on the subject set in stone?? Why would you destroy the continuity and ease of access to infomation? It's one thing to correct and help "editors" new to the wikipedia world but in my humble opinion it is quite another to trash their efforts and give no solid reasoning for the destruction. So since you have destroyed an afternoon's work of organizing, care to tell me a little bit more about these formating rules that I can't seem to find anywhere on wikipedia? Mononosh 20:35, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Help Me

I realize I came off more than a little agressive, sorry for that. I understand that the talk page isn't a fourm or blog for the Lost Room. But you must admit, remaining neutral and offering no subjectivity isn't easy (I've seen it in your own comments on the Objects talk page). Here's my question, what is the correct method of editing a page with horrible formatting? For instance on the Objects talk page there is a section in the "potential objects" about the legion's list of known objects. That section is out of place, it doesn't belong in potential objects (because it is a list of verified objects). How, or who is supposed to move it, and where does one move it while staying inline with the chronological rules that you insist must be upheld? I want to learn and contribute to the wiki experience. I would also like to avoid wasting my time with edits that are going to be "over ruled." I can deal with being over ruled, but please explain how to edit an out of control talk page so I'm not just wasting my time attempting to help (at least the example given above). Thanks. Mononosh 21:26, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Hmm, ok it's slowly sinking in. But I'm still a little confused. Example: I listed something I considered a "potential object" on the talk page. Since listing the items, it has been decided that such items can not be included as objects based on the current knowlege of the items. Is it ok for me to delete these entries by editing and simply removing my previous comments? Or with discussion/talk pages is it "set in stone" once written? Should I add a note below the previous listing to nullify the older invalid comment? Sorry just trying to learn. --Mononosh 21:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the tips, much appreciated. I am crazy, but not crazy enough to believe I have the right to delete the contributions of others. So I guess I've got that going for me. Again thanks for "setting me straight" on editing. --Mononosh 22:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Human(Dragon Ball) and Dragon World

Hello, my name is Sir james paul and I am here to resolve the dipute inbeetween Animedude360 and you. Both of you need to work on this fast so you can get this over with. I would like to ask both of you to be civil, and follow policies and guidlines at all times during this. What we will have to do is reach an agreement on the article talk pages. I would like the articles to be 2 while we are talking about this, if we agree to merge them, then we will, vise versa. If you have any questions regarding this you can talk to me here[1]. Have a nice week and god bless.--Sir james paul 02:02, 17 December 2006 (UTC)


  • Are you willing to give the other user what he wants or do you want it to be 1 article?
  • Are you willing to talk to him?

--Sir james paul 04:55, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm here as a mediator and I will help both of you solve this. I will make sure that we come up with a compromise. The debate will be at my desk, okay?--Sir james paul 05:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

On my desk leave a comment about where you stand on this, why you do, and what you think a good compromise is. --Sir james paul 05:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Answer the following

  • have you found the Advocacy process useful?
  • Answer:
  • has your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
  • Answer:
  • On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite is your Advocate?
  • Answer:
  • On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate is at solving the problem?
  • Answer:
  • On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process has been altogether?
  • Answer:

Please put the question and the answer to it on my talk page--Sir james paul 06:14, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

If you have any ideas for compromises please tell about them on my desk. The more we have the better. God bless.--Sir james paul 07:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

no offense but (laughs like a mad man) I thought you said that you don't like getting away from your work (Wiki work) to deal with personal problems, at least that's what you told me when I wanted to talk to you about our disputes.Sam ov the blue sand 02:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Now...

I'm currently adding Category:Fictional characters with the power to shapeshift to those Naruto characters because they can transform/shapeshift using ninjutsu. It was a missing category which I was replacing. Why shouldn't it be added? Power level (Dragon Ball) 06:33, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Something to think about...

Bear in mind that if you're sick of dealing with User:Power level (Dragon Ball) all the time, and other users are too, I'm willing to impose a community ban. If he's doing nothing other than causing arguments and wasting time, and several people approach me suggesting that they want him blocked, I'll do it. --Deskana talk 12:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm getting sick of dealing with him too. I really can't stand users who are being WP:DENSE. And he's getting near the border of being uncivil, too. Yuser31415 (Review me!) 22:04, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
hope you're not talking about me too because I'm over that stuff.Sam ov the blue sand 02:09, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

AMA 2

I am sorry about not contacting you the last few day's but I am busy on 2 other cases on top of RCP. Again sorry. Lets try a break from this conflict and see if it gets better. What I mean by break is no arguments with the other editor. I will still be talking to you though. Again sorry about not talking to you. Thanks.--Sir james paul 11:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Um...

Do you know about what 58.187.151.1 is saying about you on your userpage? If I continue reverting it, I may be blocked for edit warring or 3RR... Power level (Dragon Ball) 16:00, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Smile

Sir james paul has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

AMA

Do you think we can get over this and move on in our life on wikipedia? --§Sir James Paul<<--wikiholic§ 02:55, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Do you think it is best for you to froget about it and move on?--§Sir James Paul<<--wikiholic§ 03:05, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

i smile too

Bobthehun2 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Vandalism to your userpage

I'd suggest getting it semi-protected. This vandal seems persistant. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 03:47, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

indeed--Bobthehun2 03:50, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
No problem! I know how it feels, I'm still semi-ed from the latest vandal. Oh, and to let you know, the IP called you a pig after it was blocked. I left a message with the administrator who blocked it to let them know. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 03:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
And they just said you have a brain of a pig. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 03:58, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, theres bigger fish to fry here. Back to recent changes patrol... Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 04:04, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Any more issues with this vandal? ---J.S (T/C) 19:50, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Rogue_Penguin/Archive3&oldid=1142539435"