User talk:TheAllSeeingEye

Why?

Why are you moving articles with dashes in them to names with dashes in them? There's no qualitative difference. - Denimadept (talk) 21:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

TfD

I know this was not your intention but you removed the TfD notice from Template:London Bus Routes. Please can you on any future items that are up for deletion or other not remove them until the discussion has closed. Simply south (talk) 14:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Red links

Please do not make edits like [1]; red links are not a problem. --NE2 23:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

List of slang terms for police officers

Very nice clean-up job on this article. --JeffJ (talk) 05:54, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Dorset Template

How do you get the 'centred dot' to show between the flowered brackets? Thanks. Eldumpo (talk) 19:45, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Vogue Templates

You have edited some of these in the past so please comment at Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2009_August_14#Vogue_covers.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 12:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

I find it odd that you just updated Template:2000-2009VogueCovers, but did not comment on the deletion debate above.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 12:24, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

In this case, not voting is essentially voting against since they will be deleted without your vote, but would likely be kept with your vote in support. It is not a matter of getting "het up" as you say, it is a matter of deciding content for the project.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:16, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Extra chronology 2

I am not sure what I broke on {{Extra chronology 2}}, but I didn't want to re-do my edit to see! <g> Sorry about breaking it, I'll do more testing if I change it again.

Unfortunately, the current version doesn't really work properly, either. In some usage cases the 88% is being applied to a font that is already a reduced size, and that means that a chronology produced via {{Infobox single}} isn't the same size as one added to the infobox via {{Extra Chronology 2}}. I forget where I saw that issue; Bohemian Rhapsody looked correct after your revert so maybe there is something unusual about the article I saw where it didn't look right. When I get a chance I'll create a sandbox and some testcases and that will help resolve the issue, if there is one. — John Cardinal (talk) 14:59, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Just had a look at {{Infobox_song}}, {{Infobox_album}} and {{Infobox_single}} - and {{Infobox_song}} is the only one that appears to set up fonts generally; the others set their chronology the use to 88% fonts but don't set the Misc bit to any particular size - I'm guessing that means there is no format to inherit. Hope that helps. --TheAllSeeingEye (talk) 02:25, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

ATP Masters Series Doubles

Hello, TheAllSeeingEye,
Why don't you go and do the doubles one like the singles, since you know what you did.
Thanks,
BLUE_DOG^TN 22:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank You!BLUE_DOG^TN 22:51, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Hajdú-Bihar

Hi, can you explain me in basic English (because my English is not the best), why the changes were necessary on the {{Hajdú-Bihar}} template? I'd like to understand it, because now I feel the template became more complicated with the 'nowrap' and other things. And I specially don't understand the "w" in the dot separators' template. Thanks very much. --Perfectmiss (talk) 19:38, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation!--Perfectmiss (talk) 08:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:01, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:GT SUDOKU.svg

A tag has been placed on File:GT SUDOKU.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:38, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fifteenth Lok Sabha summary

Template:Fifteenth Lok Sabha summary has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chandan Guha (talk) 13:11, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:At Last the 1948 Show

Template:At Last the 1948 Show has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 09:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)