User talk:Terrellezell

Hi!!!

Hi I'm xo2duffluver from Oh-Hilary.com forums. IF YOU CAN REMEMbBER :D

Image copyright problem with Image:91240_491202949_elo22_hilary_duff_106_H142605_L.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:91240_491202949_elo22_hilary_duff_106_H142605_L.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:34, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Hilary Duff, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --Yamla 16:11, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Play with Fire (song)

Your recent contribution(s) to to the Wikipedia article Play with Fire (song) are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! Extraordinary Machine 20:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With_Love..._Hilary_Duff

This article has been deleted again. I can find no evidence that you nominated it for undeletion, though it is entirely likely that you were unaware the article was deleted earlier today. Additionally, the article was (still) blatant advertising. Please see WP:NOT, this content is inappropriate on the Wikipedia. --Yamla 17:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Introducing POV

Please don't introduce uncited points of view, such as you did to Ciara. See WP:NPOV. Thanks. --Yamla 16:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hilary Duff's new album

Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article Hilary Duff are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! Lillygirl 23:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hilary Duff

Your contributions to Hilary Duff are good and all, but you cannot take pictures from other websites as they are under copyright. "Currentness" of a picture does not matter. The picture on the Hilary Duff article is FREE, because the creator of the picture has released all his/her rights to it, so it can be used on Wikipedia. The picture you keep changing to is clearly copyrighted; it even has a watermark of a Hilary Duff fan page. Please see WP:FU for more details. SKS2K6 07:54, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Hilary-innewyork207.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Hilary-innewyork207.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Muchness 08:54, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Image:Raiseyourvoice.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Raiseyourvoice.jpg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.cincinnati.com/freetime/movies/reviews/10082004_raiseyourvoice.html. As a copyright violation, Image:Raiseyourvoice.jpg appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Raiseyourvoice.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on [[Talk:Image:Raiseyourvoice.jpg]]. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Image:Raiseyourvoice.jpg, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Muchness 09:21, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Hilary-innewyork207.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Hilary-innewyork207.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Muchness 10:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image Image:Hilary-innewyork2007.jpg has also been listed as a possible copyright violation. --Muchness 10:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your image uploads

Please stop uploading copyright images with inaccurate descriptions. See WP:IUP and WP:FAIR#Policy for further info on Wikipedia's image use policies. --Muchness 10:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:With Love2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:With Love2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 16:36, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dignity Japenese Edition Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dignity Japenese Edition Cover.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 16:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:02hc.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:02hc.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 16:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:02pic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:02pic.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 16:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for continuing to violate Wikipedia's image copyright and fair use policies after numerous warnings. You are welcome to resume editing once the block expires but please do not upload or use any more images in violation of WP:FU. Thanks. --Yamla 16:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

images

Citing images that you did not take as your own work is not only plagiarism, it is copyright violation. I'm advising you to take a break from editing images or from editing pop culture articles for a while.⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 07:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked. TWINKLE

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for falsly claiming public domain, and ownership of an image that is copyrighted and not yours, after having been warned previously about copyrighted images.. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 05:53, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 05:53, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hillary Duff

Please do not add information to articles that cannot be verified via a reliable source. Thanks, OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Controversey" on Dignity (album)

Please don't sensationalise trivial items of information by putting words like "controversey" before them. Billboard magazine made a mistake, nothing more; it hasn't been reported in any articles that I can find, and it certainly isn't a "Controversey". Also, when you wrote "Controversey" it was a) incorrectly capitalised - it should begin with a small "c" because it isn't a proper noun, and b) it's spelt "controversy". Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 23:18, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Dignity (album) and other articles

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Dignity (album), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Extraordinary Machine 15:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Dignity (album). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Thank you. Note also that changing already cited material, such as the worldwide sales figure, is considered disruption, and may lead to you temporarily being blocked from editing if you do it again. Extraordinary Machine 20:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Dignity (album). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Extraordinary Machine 00:47, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Milagros.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Milagros.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Reachoutsj7.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Reachoutsj7.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:28, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Myra album.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Myra album.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Lizzie Mcg.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Lizzie Mcg.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NrDg 22:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:With Love2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:With Love2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hand on My Heart

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hand on My Heart, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Hand on My Heart. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 19:51, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Faded (Haylie Duff song)

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Faded (Haylie Duff song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 03:02, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Raventourgd6.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Raventourgd6.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Womanizer (song) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 22:54, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of What Goes Up (film)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article What Goes Up (film), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Future films are not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided, none found. (IMDb is not a reliable source and dvdlist is a mirror of IMDb.)

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 18:18, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Cdvu.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cdvu.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Myra album.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Myra album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:11, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Raiseyourvoice1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Raiseyourvoice1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Secret ^account 05:10, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of CDVU+ for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CDVU+ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CDVU+ until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ï¿½ (talk) 12:18, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Myra album.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Myra album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hilary Duff: This Is Now

The article Hilary Duff: This Is Now has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Too short-lived for any attention besides routine PR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Milagros (album)

The article Milagros (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources and not notable per WP:NALBUMS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]