User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia as of October 2009.

RfD nomination of T:SINGLE

RfD nomination of T:ONES

TfD nomination of Template:Rz

I have nominated Template:Rz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Cenarium (talk) 16:39, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Altwelcome

Template:Altwelcome has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 09:13, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GroupTable

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on GroupTable requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Malcolma (talk) 09:19, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

United States, USA listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect United States, USA. Since you had some involvement with the United States, USA redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Kumioko (talk) 15:21, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of TuxFamily

The article TuxFamily has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The only site I could find with any coverage about the subject was Wikipedia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Odie5533 (talk) 18:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Journalness for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Journalness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journalness until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 22:23, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Xbox softmods

The article Xbox softmods has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no attempt to establish independent notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠♠ BanëJ ♠♠ ^(Talk) 14:31, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FreeDOS 32 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect FreeDOS 32. Since you had some involvement with the FreeDOS 32 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Keφr 18:43, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of List of list of wikis

A tag has been placed on List of list of wikis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. -- Trevj (talk) 08:21, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Allsvenskan (speedway) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Allsvenskan (speedway). Since you had some involvement with the Allsvenskan (speedway) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Banner talk 21:35, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

T:SINGLE listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect T:SINGLE. Since you had some involvement with the T:SINGLE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Keφr 10:03, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UbuntU listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect UbuntU. Since you had some involvement with the UbuntU redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The ChampionMan 1234 11:11, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User page listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect User page. Since you had some involvement with the User page redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - The ChampionMan 1234 03:30, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CorelCapture.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CorelCapture.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:11, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CorelCapture.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CorelCapture.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:10, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Boys from the County Hell

The article Boys from the County Hell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 10:26, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wakopedia listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wakopedia. Since you had some involvement with the Wakopedia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - The ChampionMan 1234 02:21, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brazil Nuts

Hello, Tohd8BohaithuGh1. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Brazil Nuts, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 22:27, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Physical firewall listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Physical firewall. Since you had some involvement with the Physical firewall redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 03:19, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WWW.google.COM listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WWW.google.COM. Since you had some involvement with the WWW.google.COM redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:18, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ist of wikis listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ist of wikis. Since you had some involvement with the Ist of wikis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:32, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikipediaDotorg listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WikipediaDotorg. Since you had some involvement with the WikipediaDotorg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:03, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

（） listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect （）. Since you had some involvement with the （） redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cameroom listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cameroom. Since you had some involvement with the Cameroom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:08, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nobel Peace Prixe listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nobel Peace Prixe. Since you had some involvement with the Nobel Peace Prixe redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:11, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Walt DisneyY listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Walt DisneyY. Since you had some involvement with the Walt DisneyY redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:14, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Patch (computing listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Patch (computing. Since you had some involvement with the Patch (computing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:50, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Windows Genuine Disadvantage listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Windows Genuine Disadvantage. Since you had some involvement with the Windows Genuine Disadvantage redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:53, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiikiipedia listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wiikiipedia. Since you had some involvement with the Wiikiipedia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Abote2 (talk) 10:14, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Memory bread listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Memory bread. Since you had some involvement with the Memory bread redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:02, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Transformation Biscuts listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Transformation Biscuts. Since you had some involvement with the Transformation Biscuts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:04, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"MICRO$OFT" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MICRO$OFT. Since you had some involvement with the MICRO$OFT redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:38, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Jumbo Wales" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jumbo Wales. Since you had some involvement with the Jumbo Wales redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 17:22, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"UN/" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect UN/. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 20#UN/ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TheAwesome Hwyh 16:29, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"多啦A梦" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 多啦A梦. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 3#多啦A梦 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 122.60.65.44 (talk) 02:55, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Template:Reimprove" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:Reimprove. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 5#Template:Reimprove until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:17, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Deputy Editor" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Deputy Editor and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 11#Deputy Editor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:01, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Uw-engvar/doc

Template:Uw-engvar/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:IMDb warn

Template:IMDb warn has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Indagate (talk) 21:19, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Inland Waterway" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Inland Waterway has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 19 § Inland Waterway until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Southwestern Europe

The article Southwestern Europe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:OR/WP:SYNTH. Same as with Northwestern Europe.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]