User talk:Tellyring

Baal Veer Returns

Baal Veer Returns Season 2 Rijwansahim (talk) 13:01, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Your edit to Draft:Vansh sayani has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Laplorfill (talk) 06:12, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You MUST stop adding that image to Draft:Vansh sayani. That image is clearly copyrighted by the subject and your continual violation of Wikipedia's strict copyright policy is unacceptable. You have been reported to the administrators for further action. Laplorfill (talk) 06:34, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remember to always be signed in to your account when editing this article. David notMD (talk) 07:54, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I own it. Tellyring (talk) 21:33, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Baalveer Returns, you may be blocked from editing. Laplorfill (talk) 19:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I won't do it now. Tellyring (talk) 08:55, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Sony SAB, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your draft at Draft:Vansh sayani has that name representing a person, and there's no source saying that the TV station Sony SAB has that name — Amakuru (talk) 14:22, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Further note: I have deleted your article at Vansh sayani, as it was unsourced and had the same issues that are detailed below, which caused Draft:Vansh sayani to be rejected for creation. Please update the draft so that it is cited to reliable sources before re-creating this. Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 14:38, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Vansh Sayani, you may be blocked from editing. Polyamorph (talk) 07:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vansh Sayani. Laplorfill (talk) 07:03, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Polyamorph (talk) 08:35, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Vansh Sayani shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Polyamorph (talk) 08:26, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank a page, as you did with this edit to Vansh sayani. —chaetodipus (talk) 09:29, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vansh sayani (May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vansh sayani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vansh sayani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:17, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tellyring! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:17, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vansh sayani has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vansh sayani. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Laplorfill (talk) 00:39, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vansh sayani (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vansh sayani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vansh sayani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Celestina007 (talk) 10:06, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 10:51, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Upon reviewing the comments of others and the information above, I have instituted this block. I also don't think your deception with removing prior decline messages from your ~~staff~~draft was helpful. You will need to respond to the points made on this page and describe any connection you have with the subject of your edits. 331dot (talk) 10:54, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

After your block expires, please explain your connection to Vansh Sayani. Family? Friend of family? Manager? Also, your Edit summaries are always "I have made some changes." This is useless. The purpose of an Edit summary is to give other editors an idea of the nature of the changes. David notMD (talk) 13:13, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock discussion

UTRS appeal #43900 is now open. The ANI report says, and I quote, " They have a long history of problematic edits, and have for the last few weeks been trying to create an article about Vansh Sayani, a child actor. They created Draft:Vansh sayani and when that was rejected they inserted the material over the redirect at Vansh Sayani. All without adequate sources, which makes it a serious WP:BLP violation. Despite multiple editors warning them about the copyright and BLP violations involved in their editing, they have edit warred to keep this inappropriate material on Wikipedia. " There is also a problem with non informative edit summaries. Could you address these concerns, please? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:18, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the unblock request did not attempt to address the issues which led to the block, and instead claimed that the editor had done nothing wrong. When multiple editors are highlighting issues, we need to see some acknowledgement of those issues and a commitment not to repeat them. — Amakuru (talk) 17:40, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #43900 is now closed. I was awaiting a response, but they can reply here just as well. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:01, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not blank redirects

Please do not blank the redirect at Vansh Sayani as you did here. If you think the redirect should be deleted, then you can open a discussion at WP:RM. Courtesy pings @Deepfriedokra, Amakuru, and 331dot: user appears to have returned to the same editing behaviour that got them blocked. Polyamorph (talk) 10:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 10:17, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vansh sayani (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vansh sayani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vansh sayani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:28, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]