User talk:TeaLover1996/Archive 10

Archive 5

←

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

→

Archive 15

3RR

Seriously, you need to understand WP:3RR and WP:BRD, reverting (even if you are right) can lead to a block. Bring it to the attention of WT:FOOTY or start a discussion on the article Talk page. JMHamo (talk) 09:40, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Archive with bot

Hi, I see that you have set the bot at archiving after two days but it did not archive and you had to do it manually. I believe this is because the information about archive has to be on top of the page, User:MiszaBot/config says that, so if I were you, I would move it up above the topicons (perhaps above displaytitle). Just an idea. Qed237 (talk) 12:09, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

@Qed237:  Done I'll do it in a minute and see if that works. Cheers TeaLover1996 (talk) 00:35, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Continuting discussion

@Qed237: I have placed it at the top and yet nothing 2 days old has been automatically archived, any thoughts? TeaLover1996 (talk) 06:33, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

There was a letter missing for the bot to understand how to use the counter, maybe that will help, Qed237 (talk) 11:09, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

And also I see bot has not been to my page either in last couple of days, something might be wrong with it. Dont worry it will show up. Qed237 (talk) 11:17, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Changes reverted in List_of_widget_toolkits

Hi. You lastly reverted my changes in List_of_widget_toolkits. The reason ("I believe the article was better before you made that change") is not clear to me. Can you explain what I did wrong and what I should do? Thanks Arnaud.meurgues (talk) 11:26, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on List of widget toolkits. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 14:00, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Yes.

Yes it does count, because it is a friendly match on fifa recognized day for friendly matches:) Adnan (talk) 20:25, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

About talkback templates

Hi TeaLover1996,

I've noticed that you help out at the Teahouse, which is great! I've also noticed that you used a regular {{Talkback}} template when you notified an IP editor in this edit, which is probably fine; however, did you know that there's also a specific {{teahouse talkback}} template that's available for Teahouse hosts? I don't know if you know about it, so that's why I'm giving you this friendly notice. Anyways, thanks again for helping others out at the Teahouse! CabbagePotato (talk) 23:59, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

@CabbagePotato: Yes, I was aware of the template, but at the time of leaving the message, I think I forgot about it, but thanks for the heads up. And no problem about helping at the Teahouse, I hope to see you there helping others . Thank You. TeaLover1996 (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

OWSLA Wikipedia Page

Yo I work for OWSLA ... The info you have on that page is incorrect and I'm trying to fix it as it's representative of my company.

OwslaHQ (talk) 00:05, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Andrew

@OwslaHQ: You work for the company?, then you need to read This information article, to add you may be wanting to fix the article as it is a representative of your company, however unless you can provide reliable sources to back up the content you add then other editors will just remove it to comply with Wikipedia's Policy on Verifiability, and persistent adding of unsourced content to articles will result in loss of editing privileges. So please keep this in mind when editing. TeaLover1996 (talk) 00:12, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

So email me at andrew@owsla.com or something but stop reverting the page to show false information about our releases. You're the only one reverting my changes, not any other editors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OwslaHQ (talk • contribs) 00:15, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Firstly, I do not wish to email you as I do not want to disclose my email address, secondly if you check the history tab of the article, you will see that another editor has reverted your edit for removal of sourced content. Thank You TeaLover1996 (talk) 00:18, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Turns out the source, [1], doesn't actually say they're owned by Warner Group. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:41, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

@Joseph2302: I thought that an editor would have checked that when it was added. Strange, anyway thanks for your help in this matter TeaLover1996 (talk) 00:44, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

One of me or you should have checked it earlier to avoid all this chaos. I now need to go redact all the warnings on their talkpage. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:45, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

There is an edit summary: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=OWSLA&diff=665692164&oldid=665689864 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jadeslair (talk • contribs) 00:46, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

@Joseph2302: Everyone makes mistakes, the point is that we learn from them, we can take what we've learnt from this for better editing behaviour in the future. TeaLover1996 (talk) 00:49, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Second block for User:Yahzitere Yahmarabhi

Please consider to revert your addition of a second block notice [2] at the talk page of User:Yahzitere Yahmarabhi. It appears to be misleading. Thank you JimRenge (talk) 13:48, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Also, why were you adding block notices? That's an admin's job, not yours. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:12, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

The following question is copied from my talk page, I prefer to answer here JimRenge (talk) 23:27, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

I put two block notices one because the user was blocked for disruptive editing, and another later on because the user had been blocked again for edit warring, how is putting block notices when a user is blocked mis–leading? TeaLover1996 (talk) 16:33, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Blocks and block notices are given by administrators. Editors who receive your block notices might believe you are an administrator.The second block notice you gave him is misleading because he might think he was blocked two times (he was not: [3]; 23:02, 6 June 2015).

Earlier in 2015, you have already insisted to give block notices to USER:Vaselineeeeeeee [4], [5], [6], [7], and USER:Pktlaurence [8], [9]. These block notices were reverted by several editors, including an administrator, and two experienced editors explained why it is not appropriate to add them [10], [11]. Please stop it, I don´t want to see you blocked. Thank you JimRenge (talk) 23:27, 8 June 2015 (UTC)