User talk:Tbo 157

Rehoboth Carpenter Family

Hey Tbo,

I need some help ...

Regarding Rehoboth Carpenter family - We have surveyed, we have compromised, we have repeatedly asked to user Iwanafish to communicate. He refuses with his snide comments and reversions to non-wiki versions. We have warned him "offically" a lot more than 3 times. Repeatedly, we have asked for mediation, we have asked for help and I do not know who else to ask. Can you pass this up the chain of editors?

User Iwanafish continues to disrupt and vandalize this page and it has spread his behavior to other pages. John Carpenter (bishop) John Carpenter, town clerk of London What else can we do but shut down the articles involved and provide warnings that when they are restored by user Iwanafish that they are garbage? Has wikipedia lost the ability to police itself? I am beginning to think this is a hopeless cause where such bullies can inflict such damage to wikipedia.

What else can be done? John R. Carpenter Jrcrin001 (talk) 06:00, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I did do a lot for the schools project, but I'm now only there occasionally. I suggest you post your note at the schools page. Either on there talk page or on the Assessments page. Hope that helps .... if not then do come back Victuallers (talk) 15:22, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. However, it seems Iwanafish is no longer a problem. He was dealt with and hopefully will mend his behavior. The Rehoboth Carpenter Family now seems stable. Jrcrin001 (talk) 02:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Young adult (psychology)#Which to use for young adult and adolescent?

Hello, Tbo 157. Will you weigh in on the above linked discussion? Flyer22 (talk) 22:58, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've left some comments on the talk page.Tbo ¹⁵⁷(talk) 11:16, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The GA

Through bad timing, I'll be away the next week, but I'll be online from time to time and will help out if needed if I possibly can. Good luck! By the way, if you get a chance, read my article Matthew Boulton, it is TFA on Monday!--Wehwalt (talk) 00:14, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Wehwalt. Tbo ¹⁵⁷(talk) 11:12, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

City of London School

Hi Tbo 157. I'm doing the GA review of City of London School. I've just taken a quick look and it seems fairly decent. I have initial concerns about the lead and the lists at the end which I have mentioned in the review. I'll give the article a closer look later and let you know if there's anything that needs serious attention. Regards SilkTork *^YES! 01:03, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for volunteering to review my article. I look forward to your comments. Tbo ¹⁵⁷(talk) 11:11, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've made some suggestions for improvements at Talk:City of London School/GA1. Regards SilkTork *^YES! 18:55, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have added some questions related to your review. Thanks. Tbo ¹⁵⁷(talk) 20:33, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Star - I always appreciate getting those. And thanks for finishing off listing City of London School. I was in the middle of doing it, got distracted by another GA Review, and then had to go out for a meal with some friends. Warm regards SilkTork *^YES! 19:47, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Tbo ¹⁵⁷(talk) 20:48, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You learn something every day!

[1] I didn't know you could do that. That saves a bit of typing! SilkTork *^YES! 22:21, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, you do learn something new everyday. Tbo ¹⁵⁷(talk) 15:29, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An exciting opportunity to get involved!

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 05:27, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Underground stock

Hi Tbo 157
Please see Template talk:Infobox Underground stock#Additional parameters. Peter Horn User talk 22:53, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Task Force/statustemplate

Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Task Force/statustemplate, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Task Force/statustemplate and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Task Force/statustemplate during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) ^talk
_Contribs 10:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Membership of the Counter-Vandalism Unit

As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.

You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:55, 30 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

File:WPLTLBTF.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WPLTLBTF.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:WPLTLUTF.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WPLTLUTF.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 19:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy message from WikiProject Transport

Hi there Tbo 157. You are registered with WikiProject Transport and we are cleaning out our list of members. As you have not contributed to any page for over a year we have removed you as inactive. If you still want to participate in the project, just go back and add yourself again. Thank you. Rcsprinter (speak) @ 16:40, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The UK Trams Portal listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The UK Trams Portal. Since you had some involvement with the The UK Trams Portal redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). John Vandenberg ^(chat) 05:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:UK trams

Portal:UK trams, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:UK trams and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:UK trams during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:45, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Sports facilities task force

Template:WikiProject Sports facilities task force has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:17, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for City of London School

City of London School has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 07:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]