User talk:Taromsky
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Taromsky, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Katr67 (talk) 03:11, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For your diligent work in improving the archaeology category tree. Дякую! – Joe (talk) 09:31, 14 October 2017 (UTC) |
Thank you very much Joe! I truly appreciate it.
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Taromsky. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Dutch painters
[edit]Most Dutch Mannerist painters are not Dutch Golden Age painters, & the Mannerist category should not be a sub of that one (I have removed it). Where appropriate artists should be in both categories. You are missing a load of the earlier 16th-century ones. Are you sure you know what you are doing here? The terminology is tricky. Johnbod (talk) 20:07, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thank John for your expertise.--Taromsky (talk) 22:28, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Slovakian architects
[edit]A tag has been placed on Category:Slovakian architects requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:12, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Nomination of LifeWise Health Plan of Oregon for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LifeWise Health Plan of Oregon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LifeWise Health Plan of Oregon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Balle010 (talk) 17:57, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ukrainian museologists
[edit]A tag has been placed on Category:Ukrainian museologists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:54, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Julius Ferdinand Räbiger moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Julius Ferdinand Räbiger, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 19:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Rutherford College (North Carolina)
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Rutherford College (North Carolina) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.lostcolleges.com/rutherford-college. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 16:38, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, but the text was too closely phrased, an example being these bolded parts, which were copied directly from the source:
- "The school became known as “the “School of the Prophets.” After the death of Dr. Abernethy in 1894 and his son in 1900, Rutherford College was taken over by the Western North Carolina Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South. The Conference was operating the college as a secondary school. Later on the Conference added 5th and 6th grades so it can operate as a college again. In 1934 the Conference merged Rutherford College with Weaver College and Brevard Institute to form Brevard College.
- Rutherford college was operating as a two-year college and a high school. Its faculty was nine, including the president and the matron. In 1930 there was 48 freshmen and 16 sophomores with 30 Junior and Senior students in the high school. In college were athletics, two literary societies, two religious groups, three musical groups, a drama group, and two publications groups." Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 22:09, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Julius Ferdinand Räbiger
[edit]Hello, Taromsky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Julius Ferdinand Räbiger, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Julius Ferdinand Räbiger
[edit]Hello, Taromsky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Julius Ferdinand Räbiger".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Category:French Baroque gardeners has been nominated for renaming
[edit]Category:French Baroque gardeners has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:26, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mesolithic peoples
[edit]A tag has been placed on Category:Mesolithic peoples indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:07, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Category:Archaeological cultures of Southwestern Europe has been nominated for merging
[edit]Category:Archaeological cultures of Southwestern Europe has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 22:16, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Category:Archaeological cultures by ethnic group has been nominated for merging
[edit]Category:Archaeological cultures by ethnic group has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 23:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Category:Medieval archaeological cultures has been nominated for merging
[edit]Category:Medieval archaeological cultures has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 23:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Category:Turkic archeological cultures has been nominated for deletion
[edit]Category:Turkic archeological cultures has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 14:36, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Category:Baltic archaeological cultures has been nominated for deletion
[edit]Category:Baltic archaeological cultures has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 17:03, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Category:Germanic archaeological cultures has been nominated for deletion
[edit]Category:Germanic archaeological cultures has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 18:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Category:Archaeology of Southwestern Europe has been nominated for merging
[edit]Category:Archaeology of Southwestern Europe has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 04:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Category:Upper Paleolithic discoveries has been nominated for merging
[edit]Category:Upper Paleolithic discoveries has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Category:French Baroque garden designers has been nominated for splitting
[edit]Category:French Baroque garden designers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:48, 8 March 2024 (UTC)