User talk:Tandrum

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Tandrum! Thank you for your contributions. I am Sleddog116 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Sleddog116 (talk) 23:01, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tandrum! Drop by the Teahouse anytime!

Hello! Tandrum, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 23:39, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 16:07, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message sent with Global message delivery.

Nomination of Historical accuracy of Enemy at the Gates for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Historical accuracy of Enemy at the Gates is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historical accuracy of Enemy at the Gates until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 20:48, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Fixing" redirects.

Hi, I recently reverted one of your edits to Milky Way, because you replaced [[Local fluff]] with [[Local Interstellar Cloud|Local fluff]]. Please bear in mind WP:NOTBROKEN when editing. Thanks, Reatlas (talk) 13:56, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roger Richebé, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Cheat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gilles Paquet-Brenner

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Gilles Paquet-Brenner. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:17, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

wp:v

Hi ... if there is a reliable source, please supply an inline citation per wp:v. Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 03:52, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your redirect of The cat is out of the bag

Hi. Please do not put multiple redirects on one single redirect page. Your version is breaking the redirect. Please make individual redirects to point to one single article, rather than several on a single page. I have fixed this. Again. Thank you. Humblesnore (talk) 00:00, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to the template The cat is out of the bag, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with Help:Redirect. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Unforgettableid (talk) 01:46, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Elijah Wood may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

was Wood's role as [[Aidan Quinn]]'s son in ''[[Avalon (1990 film)|Avalon]]'' and ''[[Tin Men]]'') that garnered Wood professional attention, as ''Avalon'' received widespread critical acclaim and

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:31, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seiko Yamamoto

Thanks for your review, one question though: Why the infobox doesn't show medals? Need your help on it please!--Mishae (talk) 21:59, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Check the second source.--Mishae (talk) 01:23, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it, should be good now.--Mishae (talk) 01:32, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you be so kind by patrolling the talk pages of created by me articles as well? Seiko Yamamoto will be an example.--Mishae (talk) 04:16, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, first of all, I have autism myself, so that's the main reason. Second, why not? If no one touched them for more than couple of years and there is plenty of info available online to make them notable... My moto is simple; see the red link? Create an article (if the reliable sources are available that is). Another thing to point out is that I used to be an Olympian myself (used to play for Robbinsdale School District in Plymouth) and have 5 medals for adaptive football and softball. However, I just got bored with plants after I spent a month writing only on Melica species. By the way, for more info and the amount of my (mostly stub) articles visit my user page (I assure you, you will be amazed). :)--Mishae (talk) 12:53, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Will persons like those be consider notable?: Amberlynn Weber--Mishae (talk) 20:29, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So it doesn't matter weather they won it at the Olympics or at ParaPan?--Mishae (talk) 20:35, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another question, certain articles list certain athletes as "won first place", does it mean gold medal?--Mishae (talk) 20:43, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, because in infobox I already put it as gold, silver, etc. Because see, its unlikely that an athlete can have a first place without a medal, considering the competition...--Mishae (talk) 20:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well as far as my knowledge goes:

1st = Gold
2nd = Silver
3rd = Bronze

Starting from fourth and on there is no medals. But, yeah, you are right, if no one complains then its good... But if anyone will I have your back. :)--Mishae (talk) 21:04, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In newspapers, yes, but online such as all those Olympic Committee sites, haven't seen any. Either way, thanks for clearing up some stuff for me. :)--Mishae (talk) 21:23, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another question

If a person is both an Olympian and a scientist should I still use Olympic infobox or should I use a scientist one, or neither? Cassie Mitchell will be the prime example here, but others too are wounded vets that became Paralympians.--Mishae (talk) 23:21, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tried it. Doesn't work the way you explained. Show me an example please.--Mishae (talk) 00:30, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for it! Now, I am still confused about notability. For example, today I wrote this article: Upali Rajakaruna. He have wins in certain Open Draws. Is it still notable?--Mishae (talk) 17:42, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sandwich

Thanks for your interest in improving Sandwich. I couldn't quite understand what issues you were trying to address with your recent edit, since you didn't provide an edit summary. For now, I've rolled back your edit until we can work together to come up with some positive changes to the article. There are a few points of discussion at Talk:Sandwich to which you may want to contribute, and perhaps introduce some new suggestions. I look forward to working with you to improve the article. Thanks, Ibadibam (talk) 20:29, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please, let's try to work together on this. If you'd explain what it is that needs improvement, other editors can help you fine-tune the improvements to build on the existing content and consensus. How about starting a section at Talk:Sandwich instead of us trading reverts? And I beg you, let's keep it civil—please, please stop cursing in your edit summaries. I know it's frustrating to get edits reverted, but it's just part of the process—not personal. Ibadibam (talk) 10:09, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Small Apartments, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mustard, Binocular and Pickle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chimping out listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chimping out. Since you had some involvement with the Chimping out redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkj11210 (talk • contribs) 00:14, 22 March 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chimp out

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Chimp out, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Shameless characters (American adaptation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bouncer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Shameless (U.S. TV series) characters may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

and has a very long prison record, like his father Terry. Mickey is [Bisexuality|bisexual]], but claims to just prefer men but is acts like the pimp of both gay and straight services. He and

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:43, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crank: High Voltage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Honeypot. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Sock (pka Corvoe) ^{(be heard)}_{(my stuff)} 19:52, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Additional note: From WP:FILMPLOT: "The plot summary is an overview of the film's main events, so avoid minutiae like dialogue, scene-by-scene breakdowns, individual jokes, and technical detail." Your edit contains almost all of these, which is why it is being reverted. Also, the rating of a film has no bearing on how detailed its plot should be. The Avengers has a 92% on Rotten Tomatoes has a shorter plot summary. Sock (pka Corvoe) ^{(be heard)}_{(my stuff)} 20:01, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pop punk may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

2010's, paying homage to its heyday, although it still retains a general underground following.{{
[[The Jam]],<ref>[{{Allmusic|class=artist|id=p4585/biography|pure_url=yes}} allmusic ((( The Jam > Biography )))]</ref> featured poppy melodies as well as lyrics that sometimes dealt with

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:02, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bloody Mama may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [isa Jill as Young Kate

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:17, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Machine-Gun Kelly (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Griffin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Donkey meat listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Donkey meat. Since you had some involvement with the Donkey meat redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - The ChampionMan 1234 05:29, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 16:40, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Fleck/Paterson House

The decision to merge the content of Embassy of Algeria, Ottawa to Fleck/Paterson House was taken at AFD and the summary is on the talk page here. If you want to challenge the result of the AFD you need to take it to WP:DRV. Recreating the article and redirecting other titles there is inappropriate. St★lwart¹¹¹ 09:27, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mouf listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mouf. Since you had some involvement with the Mouf redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 14:51, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Andriy Husin

Does "Being killed in a motorcycle crash in Kiev on 17 September 2014, Husin was survived by wife and three children." really sound better than "Andriy Husin was killed in a motorcycle crash in Kiev on 17 September 2014, and is survived by his wife and three children."? His wife and children are still alive, so the main sentence should be in the present tense, I think.--Mycomp (talk) 23:08, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tandrum. You have new messages at Mycomp's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of phobias, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Korean. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm Dismas. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Faye Reagan, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dismas|^(talk) 21:16, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you even lift listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Do you even lift. Since you had some involvement with the Do you even lift redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 17:55, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We dont negotiate with evil we defeat it listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect We dont negotiate with evil we defeat it. Since you had some involvement with the We dont negotiate with evil we defeat it redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 22:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2004 map listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2004 map. Since you had some involvement with the 2004 map redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 05:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Weirdness

Hello Tandrum,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Weirdness for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Atlantic306 (talk) 02:47, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shameless tv show listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shameless tv show. Since you had some involvement with the Shameless tv show redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Stefan2 (talk) 17:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nazi war machine listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nazi war machine. Since you had some involvement with the Nazi war machine redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Wishva de Silva | Talk 12:18, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 04:07, 29 July 2016 (UTC)please ping me[reply]

Bovinophagia listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bovinophagia. Since you had some involvement with the Bovinophagia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:10, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suidaephagia listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Suidaephagia. Since you had some involvement with the Suidaephagia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:13, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gallophagia listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gallophagia. Since you had some involvement with the Gallophagia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:15, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tandrum. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Retard sterilization" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Retard sterilization. Since you had some involvement with the Retard sterilization redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 06:40, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Riley reid

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Riley reid, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. creffett (talk) 13:36, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest la" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest la. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest la until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest mexico city" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest mexico city. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest mexico city until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest sf" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest sf. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 16#Tallest sf until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 01:32, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Little Fish, Strange Pond for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Little Fish, Strange Pond is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Fish, Strange Pond until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Film Creator (talk) 18:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ping Bbb23 as an FYI.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see you back, Ponyo, and thanks for the ping.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:52, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]