Jump to content

User talk:Tan Khaerr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Tan Khaerr! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 23:21, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Nusra/Jund al-Aqsa

[edit]

First, you are incorrect in your assertion that no source says Jund al-Aqsa made ​​part of the Jahbat al-Nusra. You obviously did not read the source [1] cited right next to their name which says and I quote Jund Al-Aqsa (Syrian Al-Qaeda group). I already cited this source once before for you. Plus, beside the source I already cited clearly saying they are an Al-Qaeda-linked group, you got these sources [2][3] which clearly state virtually their entire leadership has joined Nusra. Second, you just committed more than one revert on a Syrian war-related page in less than 24 hours. Per Wikipedia policy this is not allowed. I am obligated to warn you of this fact and that if you do not revert yourself you can be reported and potentially blocked. Cheers! EkoGraf (talk) 02:47, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again, for the third time, please read this source [4] and again I'm quoting it Jund Al-Aqsa (Syrian Al-Qaeda group). Why are you not acknowledging what this source is saying? EkoGraf (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article says and I quote (fourth time) Jund Al-Aqsa (Syrian Al-Qaeda group). The Al-Nusra Front is the Syrian Al-Qaeda. There is no misunderstanding about it. EkoGraf (talk) 14:16, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. EkoGraf (talk) 20:28, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at 2016 Khanasir offensive

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Block is for violation of the WP:1RR restriction on these articles. The full report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Tan Khaerr reported by User:EkoGraf (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:34, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 12 September

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Parler par mail

[edit]

Salut Je suis Panam2014. Pourrais-on parler par mail svp ? Ou même ici si vous ne pouvez pas. --Panam2014 (talk) 09:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Pannam2014, vous pouvez me contacter par courriel, mais je n'ai pas accès au votre pour l'instant. Tan Khaerr (talk) 10:18, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have vandalized multiple pages, I detected this.

[edit]

Please stop with your clearly hostile behaviour trying to undermine neutrality and factual accuracy of wikipedia, Sincerely GroundlessAir (talk) 23:00, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2019 Western Libya offensive, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Sakiv (talk) 14:43, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thermidorians. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 15:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vif12vf/Tiberius Why are you reestablishing false information and especially without source? Tan Khaerr (talk) 15:12, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Somebody added that information for a reason. If it is unsourced then it should be cn-tagged rather than hastily removed. Furthermore, it is not for you to decide whether some information is true or false, you as a person cannot use yourself as a reliable source! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 15:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Firestar464. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bucha massacre without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Firestar464 (talk) 09:43, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited War in the Vendée, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Granville and Anjou. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mali War. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. StephenMacky1 (talk) 12:48, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Mali War) for a period of 60 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 20:24, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]