User talk:Tamar Chkhartishvili

This is Tamar Chkhartishvili's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Tamar Chkhartishvili!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EUt+ (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EUt+ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tamar Chkhartishvili! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EUt+ (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OnlyNano was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EUt+ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OnlyNano^talk 01:15, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I should also mention you have not fixed any of the sourcing errors, so that is still going to apply. I would suggest you add more sources before you resubmit. OnlyNano^talk 01:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I have a question, I tried to fix everything, also sources, they are official EU sources and University website, I do not understand how can I correct it. can you help? Tamar Chkhartishvili (talk) 08:43, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! I declined your submission because it's not written in the correct tone that you would see in an encyclopedia. In your case, it is written in a promotional way. There is word choice such as "cutting-edge" and "innovative." While they might have an innovative program, this comes off as promotional, and unencyclopedic (as your goal is, in terms of tone, to write in a formal tone). You can check out this page on encyclopedic tone to get more information about what we're looking for in terms of tone.

Additionally, in terms of sources, we actually want to steer around primary sources (such as a universities page, if they are involved in the program). Instead, a great source would be a newspaper which wrote an article about EUt+. They are independent of the topic. You can find a great sourcing guide here. A great example of a source you picked very well was the Le Monde article.

A small suggestion would be renaming the "Contact" section to "External links," as that can appear promotional. Though there is no issue with simply providing a link to their website.

If you need more help, or have completed those changes, I'd be happy to re-review the article, if you'd like! OnlyNano^talk 14:08, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I modified my article and trying to publish the changes but it says "No stashed content found for 1233814434/10cc3dcf-3f23-11ef-8b3d-01e0acf07608"- what should I do? Tamar Chkhartishvili (talk) 14:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, that seems like a technical issue that's above my knowledge. I'd suggest creating a thread at the Teahouse, that way someone can take a look at what's going on. OnlyNano^talk 22:52, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Thanks for a tip, I published the new version, can you have a look? I think on this time it should be good Tamar Chkhartishvili (talk) 12:33, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course :) I'm making some minor edits, but there seems to be a lot of opinion-based content and still a bit of promotional wording, but I'll take a look and edit what I can. OnlyNano^talk 00:52, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, this is my first ever experience to publish something in Wikipedia and it is really important for me, I really tried to change every sentence and make it neutral tone as much as I could. Tamar Chkhartishvili (talk) 08:25, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, you're still new to all of this! Take a look at some of the comments I left (they are invisible, but you can see them in the editor), and let me know when you make some of those changes! I didn't want to rework your entire article, so I left some things for you to decide :) OnlyNano^talk 15:54, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I hope you have a good day, thank so much for your help, I looked to your comments and made change, can you have a look? I think, this time it should be good ^^ Tamar Chkhartishvili (talk) 08:45, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, I'll go take a look right now :) OnlyNano^talk 15:41, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: European University of Technology has been accepted

European University of Technology, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OnlyNano^talk 16:20, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]