User talk:Tad Lincoln/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Tad Lincoln. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Although I appreciate the copyediting you are doing on Mo Tae-Bum, I have a couple of questions.
- To me, although you have done copyediting you have also removed information, that although not phrased terribly well, should be included. Why did you remove it.
- Why did you tag it for cleanup. After talking to numerous editors, they thought that after mild referencing improvements which I made, it should be promoted to B class.
NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 23:34, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
the Dick Van Dyke show
hey - Bonnie Meadow Road is an actual street located in the north-end of New Rochelle. It is where the shows director, Carl Reiner, lived with his family for years. The house number (#148) doesn't exist in reality however the street/location are real. Perhaps you can reword the information so it reads more clearly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.215.173.213 (talk) 23:33, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
For the record,
Shaff and Shaff in their book Six Wars at a Time: The Life and Times of Gutzon Borglum state "By joining and trying to mold the Klan, Gutzon was not seeking personal power." (p. 197) However tossing the fact that he was a member of the Klan out in the opening part of the article is not (opinion) a good idea and I support your recent edit - rather than restoring the former one and adding a reference. At the time that GB was a member of the KKK the Klan was not what it was to become, he saw it as a grass roots funding source for his mountain carving project. Life is complicated, wikipedia too and we all get to draw the lines where we see fit. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 23:04, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:14, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Dunga
/ũ/ is how the Portuguese pronunciation of the letters "un" in "Dunga" is represented in the IPA. Please see nasal vowel and Wikipedia:IPA for Portuguese. -- Marawe (talk) 11:06, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Organ transplantation in the People's Republic of China
I have posted a GA reassessment at Talk:Organ transplantation in the People's Republic of China. Please feel free to comment. Axl ¤ [Talk] 09:53, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Please comment here. Axl ¤ [Talk] 09:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Contradictory Articles
Hi! I see you tagged César Chávez as contradictory a couple of months ago in the immigration section. I've read it a couple of times, and I can't see what's contradictory. I've removed the tag, but if the contradicton is still there, please put it back, and put a note on the talk page. Cheers! Worm 11:39, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Similarly for Sole Survivor Policy, not exactly sure what's contradictory there. Cheers Worm 11:52, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Maddow
I've reverted your last edit because it restored comments that violate WP:BLP. -- Scjessey (talk) 19:01, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Invitation to WikiProject Judaism
WikiProject Judaism | An invitation to join us! If you are already a member of WikiProject Judaism, disregard this message. | |
Hello Tad Lincoln/Archive 2, you're invited to participate in WikiProject Judaism, a WikiProject dedicated to developing and improving articles about all aspects of Judaism and Jewish Life. You can check out the Judaism WikiProject page for more information about the project and what our goals are. You can join by adding your name here. We hope to see you join us! ___________ -Invited on 1 July 2011 by Magister Scienta. |
Merge proposals
Hi, you added the {{mergewith}} template to Euan and Ewen, but did not add any parameters, so the "Discuss" links on each page go to the separate talk pages. May I suggest you either use {{mergeto}} and {{mergefrom}} in future, or add parameters such as {{merge|discuss=Talk:Euan}}?
The guidance notes at Template:Merge explain these options. They also request, After adding the merge template, please create a section on the talkpage explaining your rationale for the merge proposal.
Hope this helps – please keep up the good work! – Fayenatic L (talk) 16:55, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. When you recently edited Enrique, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enrico (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
First off, hello from a fellow tribe member.
More on topic, I was curious why you added an {{update}} tag to Axford's article. What on the page is out of date? --Jprg1966 (talk) 05:42, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
I don't get it
Just a random order you like? Green-eyed girl (Talk · Contribs) 21:38, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
List of English monarchs
I am posting this notice here to advise that on the talk page of an article to which you have made substantial edits I have asked a question concerning the validity of the article. The question has been there for some time but received no replies so I am giving my question wider distribution by notifying selected editors who have been involved with the article and giving them an opportunity to respond. Please do not reply here on your talk page or on my talk page but on the talk page of the article where other editors can easily see your comments so that hopefully we can have a constructive debate. The article is List of English monarchs. Thank you. Cottonshirtτ 07:35, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
John Hoynes
I appreciate your thoughts on wholesale deletion but it is, in fact, Wikipedia policy. Material without sources must be removed in any article - especially if there is no possibility of getting a reliable source about people who never existed. I like the TV show but we must remember that is is completely fictionalCatherinejarvis (talk) 17:31, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Catherinejarvis and The West Wing characters
She has removed biographical information from the articles of C.J. Cregg and Josh Lyman as well. Not sure what her misunderstanding is; I tried to explain, but that didn't seem to work. Go Phightins! 02:59, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
It is not "biographical" information when the characters don't exist. There can be an article, naturally, but articles on fictional people and events should not be longer than articles on the real people who play the character. Please see the Wikipedia article on "What Wikipedia is Not" for discussion of in-universe style and indiscriminate information.Catherinejarvis (talk) 17:04, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Invitation to WikiProject Breakfast
Hello, Tad Lincoln.
You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics. |
---|
June 2013
Hello, I'm MisterShiney. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Star Trek Into Darkness, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please note, per WP:BRD Your next step should be to take the discussion to the talk page with your appropriate sources as you are the one making/proposing the changes against an established consensus. MisterShiney ✉ 06:26, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tigon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello! I've replied to your post at Talk:Viktor Fasth#Pronunciation. Cheers, Heymid (contribs) 20:39, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
6.0 system
I see you tagged a passage in 6.0 system with {{elucidate}}. Can you please start a discussion at Talk:6.0 system that sets out your concerns? The passage appears clear to me. Thanks. TJRC (talk) 17:51, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tivoli Gardens may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- immediately decided Disneyland should try to emulate its "happy and unbuttoned air of relaxed fun."{{cn}
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:09, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Siri Thesis and Papal conclave, 1958
I totally removed the AP article that was quoted because it was a copyright violation and it wasn't accurate. Google news archive has the article[1] Some editor could make mention of AP's reporting in the Conclave article as long as it doesn't verbatim copy it....William 02:16, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- For whatever reason, I didn't think of removing it as a copyright violation, so thanks. Tad Lincoln (talk) 04:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Australian Open, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Anderson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 BNP Paribas Open – Women's Singles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zhu Lin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Sherlock Holmes (puppetry)
Hello. I checked the article and found the part mentions goods sold on a network is removed by you. Please tell me why. --Ishinoak (talk) 02:35, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your response on my talk page. Then I write about it in other section as you write and note that the source is in Japanese only at present. And I will add the link(s) related to them as soon as possible. --Ishinoak (talk) 11:00, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
All nation pages at the 2015 FINA World Championships
Hi Tad Lincoln,
Favor. Kindly fill out the results for all the nation pages created at the 2015 World Championships. Need to focus on creating the rest of the nation articles until tomorrow. Thank you! Raymarcbadz (talk) 18:03, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Andre Agassi
Please note that WP:INFOBOXFLAG stipulates that flag icons generally should not be used in infoboxes. Thank you for your understanding! DonIago (talk) 13:28, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Related?
Related to American President Abe Lincoln? Sandra opposed to terrorism (talk) 22:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- No, unfortunately not. In fact I don't believe the has any known living relatives. I am, however, a big fan of his, so I chose my username after his son, Tad (it's not my real name). Tad Lincoln (talk) 22:29, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 US Open – Women's Singles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand Slam. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Charlie Sheen
Thank you for the edit request you answered on Charlie Sheen. For the record, I have no objection to returning that information to the article if better sourcing appears - such as the interview he's expected to do on Tuesday. It simply isn't something Wikipedia should ever jump the gun on. 209.211.131.181 (talk) 02:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
USA medals
Do not add bronze medals to the medal table until the entire event is over. This includes the USA's boxing bronze. This has been common practice for the past several Games to avoid confusion. Please stop. Smartyllama (talk) 16:46, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Tad Lincoln. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF). About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.