User talk:Syzygy

Welcome!

Hello, Syzygy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! , SqueakBox 13:54, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

Anon

Was that anonymous user posting the email adress in this edit you? - Mgm|^(talk) 12:28, August 16, 2005 (UTC)

Yes, that'd be me. Why? Anything wrong with it? --Syzygy 06:57, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So you're the one! :-)

Well, I was going to use Syzygy as my Wiki handle, but it was taken already, so I used my given name instead ... Syzygy Darklock is a fellow wizard. --Dennette 20:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DAMN! I'm with Dennette! I wanted this handle too...but too bad for me! It's definitely a VERY cool word though. However, I want to ask: is it spelled (and spoken) the same in the German language as it is in English? With all of those "Y's" it seems like it would be impossible to say in a German way...! --172.144.136.36 13:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:-) Do you really want to know...? - The forms used are mostly Syzygie or (more officially) Syzygium. As opposed to the english version, which stresses the first and last syllable, Germans will stress the second syllable, and will split the dipthong in the end. (And, of course, the "g" is guttural, as in "guttural", as opposed to the plosive "g" in "German". ;-) Rendered in english, it will sound something like syds'ygeyeay or syds'ygeyewm. Boy, this looks wrong. I can try to come up with an OGG file for you, if you want... -- Syzygy 08:05, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Voynich Manuscript

Hello. I am translating the article about the Voynich manuscript for the greek Wikipedia. I thought the name "Voynich" was pronounced with the "ch" as "Mach" but i came across some greek websites that prounounce it as "Voynicz" ("ts"). Could you please help? Which is the correct pronounciation? Thanks in advance - Badseed 15:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, Syzygy! :) - Badseed 18:38, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Voynich Manuscript at FAR

Voynich Manuscript has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Nishkid64 (talk) 21:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Gwyn Ashton

A tag has been placed on Gwyn Ashton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 17:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Gwyn Ashton

I have nominated Gwyn Ashton, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gwyn Ashton. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 17:23, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

talkback

Hello, Syzygy. You have new messages at Pi zero's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Arthur Gordon Pym

Thanks so much for helping bring The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket up to Good Article status. I'd like to see it Featured some day, but I'm going to step away from it for now to work on other things. I may call on you when it's FAC time! --Midnightdreary (talk) 13:41, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Gfa basic editor.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Gfa basic editor.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 02:07, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paste bomb

The article Paste bomb has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 13:26, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Paste bomb

I have nominated Paste bomb, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paste bomb. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RadioFan (talk) 16:50, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voynich manuscript

Do you have any interest in helping get this back to FA status? Do you have copies of any of the books used as sources? --Andy Walsh (talk) 16:11, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andy, Sorry for the delay in replying. While I'll be happy to give the article about the VM the occassional glance, right now other things with me have higher priority than investing serious amounts of work into it. As for the books, IIRC I own d'Imperio, Kennedy, and Pelling's books in print. Cheerio, -- Syzygy (talk) 11:46, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For Ozymandis project:Chem teacher (talk) 19:42, 11 February 2011 (UTC)(reply to comment on mediation page):Yes lets send the existing mediation page to the regular official mediation group, the current mediator is not active. I think we can just send the existing page page as is.[reply]

Hi Syzygy I have subbmited the problem for mediation to:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Time_capsule

please sign the mediation page in the appropriate place (parties to the dispute agree) so that they can begin the next phase. Chem teacher (talk) 21:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

Formal mediation of the dispute relating to Time capsule has been requested. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. For an explanation of what formal mediation is, see Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Policy. Please now review the request page and the guide to formal mediation, and then, in the "party agreement" section, indicate whether you agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page.

Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 21:43, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation accepted

This message is to inform you that a request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Time capsule, in which you were listed as a party, has been accepted by the Mediation Committee. Mediation of this dispute will begin within two weeks (once a mediator has been assigned to the case), so please add the case page to your watchlist.

For an explanation of what is involved in formal mediation, see Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Policy#Mediation
For a guide to accepted cases, see Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Guide#Case phase

The entirety of the above two pages (the MedCom policy and the guide to formal mediation) are also important reading for editors who are new to formal mediation. If you have any questions, please post them onto the case talk page, or contact the MedCom mailing list.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK [•] 10:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Dear Chem teacher: I just want to let you know that I've opened the mediation discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Requests for mediation/Time capsule with some initial analysis of the Mediation Cabal case page, and an opening question I'd like to put to you both. Many thanks, --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 17:54, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Time capsule

Dear Syzygy and Chem teacher: As this is a formal mediation, I need you to complete one final piece of paperwork. Can you please read the formal closure on the mediation and, if you agree with it, sign it? Once the closure is signed, the case will be formally closed. Here's a direct link:

Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Time capsule#Formal_closure

Many thanks, --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 11:28, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Tea is just one of the things that can be warmed gently by Sterno. Thanks for six years of contributions to Wikipedia. May your pot never boil over. Will Beback talk 21:53, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Will, that really made my day! ;-) --Syzygy (talk) 11:12, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wargame Construction Set III: Age of Rifles 1846-1905.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Anderson - What's up? 08:14, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Wargame Construction Set III: Age of Rifles 1846-1905, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CharmlessCoin (talk) 14:49, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Voynich code, VoynichThoughts

i've open an account to VoynichToughts... i don't want use Wiki as a blog. i just want the researchers see that a big part of solution is here. i think that near than 99% of VM is graphical but there is always a place for doubt... Echapfr, 11th December 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.213.180.231 (talk) 00:34, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richard Parker (shipwrecked) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Parker (shipwrecked) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Parker (shipwrecked) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. St Anselm (talk) 06:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DJ Delorie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DJ Delorie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Delorie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 16:19, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Syzygy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Syzygy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Syzygy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stingray

Thanks for creating this article. I have created some SA band pages but finding refs is hard work. Do you have a subscription to the Oxford Reference? Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Gbawden! I'm sorry, I won't be able to help you much. I came across Stingray pretty much by accident and created the article mostly as a translation of the German version. Maybe you'll have more luck asking the author there? --Syzygy (talk) 15:45, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of unsolved murders (20th century), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Little Stretton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]