User talk:Syazwi Irfan

This is Syazwi Irfan's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bendahara Sakam (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bendahara Sakam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:44, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Syazwi Irfan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 07:44, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Castilian war

Hello, the results before and after the war are important. They show what impact it had on the country. The most important things were written down by me. In my opinion the edit was vandalism since the war results got deleted. Nothing was made up. AstroSaturn (talk) 12:50, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, the results is after the war is more important. also yes I know before and after the war is important. but you can just add it in the Aftermath. And i think you don't really understand what is vandalism especially in Wikipedia. Syazwi Irfan (talk) 03:52, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you wanna see true vandalism go check my user page revision history and check the edit by "Kones88". Syazwi Irfan (talk) 05:02, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on Wikipedia is the deletion of facts. That's what happened. But I get your point AstroSaturn (talk) 14:19, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well not really. If you see what Wikipedia see as Vandalism its either putting an insult, putting untruthful facts and etc... but not deletion of facts. there is article for it which you can find it here. Syazwi Irfan (talk) 17:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bendahara Sakam (October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bendahara Sakam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 08:05, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Kota Batu (1578) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Kota Batu (1578). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Article only consists of an infobox.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Pbritti (talk) 16:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Kota Batu (1578) (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see both Wikipedia's general notability guideline and verifiability policy.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Kota Batu (1578) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 13:56, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Kota Batu (1578) (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Kota Batu (1578) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 15:05, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wait.. I did not submit it Johannes Maximilian... Syazwi Irfan (talk) 15:53, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of Bruneian history moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Timeline of Bruneian history. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs a lead section and citations (which may be re-used from linked articles). I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ASUKITE 16:58, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Timeline of Bruneian history (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Noted issues have not been addressed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Timeline of Bruneian history and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 14:32, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hi Syazwi! I noticed your contributions to several Bruneian articles and some drafts you've made, and I personally wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. DuckieWackie (talk) 02:35, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Army of Bruneian Sultanate (1368–1888)

For those who have found reference(s) go here! and reply the reference(s)! Syazwi Irfan (talk) 18:03, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Kota Batu (1578) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Kota Batu (1578) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Kota Batu (1578) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pbritti (talk) 16:57, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What? a discussion when? Syazwi Irfan (talk) 17:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I followed this article..... Syazwi Irfan (talk) 17:02, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

well some parts of it Syazwi Irfan (talk) 17:03, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mughal empire flag

Hi. Please note that the flag you're adding is a known fake flag. Also, per WP:MOS, in particular per WP:INFOBOXFLAG, we avoid flags in the infobox. You should discuss this on the talk page if you believe the flag is not a fake flag. RegentsPark (comment) 14:37, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Flag removal was undiscussed Syazwi Irfan (talk) 14:41, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

and the flag comes from this. Syazwi Irfan (talk) 14:44, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First, the edit summary clearly gave a reason. Second, it is discussed now. The fact that this is a fake flag is much discussed and we can't keep repeating the discussion ad nauseam. You are edit warring and being disruptive. RegentsPark (comment) 14:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't just give it one day Syazwi Irfan (talk) 14:54, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Syazwi Irfan!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, S0091 (talk) 15:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Military of the Bruneian Sultanate (1368–1888)

Hi Syazwi Irfan, MA theses are generally considered not a reliable sources so should not used (see WP:SCHOLARSHIP) but I found this regarding cannons. S0091 (talk) 18:29, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't really me that added the hand cannon nor the cannon part... Syazwi Irfan (talk) 18:36, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see that now. Well, take a look at the source as you might find it useful (or not). I am just doing quick searches and skimming through but am unfamiliar with the topic. Oh and I did want to ask where you got that Bruneian Sultanate did not have an army until 1408? S0091 (talk) 18:52, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bruneian Sultanate did not have an army until 1408 was from the main Bruneian Sultanate Infobox. Syazwi Irfan (talk) 20:10, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And oh yeah i did see the cannon part and my cannon amount in the Battle of Kota Batu (1578) is correct according to this. It says that 62 cannons is mentioned in the Golden age of Brunei part. Syazwi Irfan (talk) 20:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the Chinese shipwreck in Brunei part can also be found here in the Military of the Bruneian Sultanate (1368-1888) Article. Syazwi Irfan (talk) 20:17, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Circumventing an AfD

If you attempt to circumvent the outcome of an AfD again, I will raise this at the appropriate forum. You've done this at least a couple times and show no indication of having learned that it is simply not permitted. There are appropriate procedures to contesting a deletion after a discussion, but what you are doing is not one of them. ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Your non-admin close of an AfD you were involved in and that had current discussion is highly improper. Do not do it again. Ping @Pbritti: fyi. // Timothy :: talk 15:57, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What would have been helpful is participation in the AfD weeks ago, in addition to improving the sources. I tried but was left on my own and its too late now. S0091 (talk) 20:45, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am considering requesting a block that lasts the remaining duration of the AfD to prevent further disruption. I am hoping that won't be necessary. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:54, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you remove The Battle of Kota Batu as a redirect? as I want make a different battle took place the same year and war but different outcome and commanders. Syazwi Irfan (talk) 17:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That depends. I recommend you first writing that article in the draft space and, rather than submitting the article through the standard AfC process, notifying some of the editors involved in the AfD once you have it completed to a state you think is good enough to be published. This would be an exercise in good-faith, as you have repeatedly sought to restore the now-deleted article several times through consensus-defying means. Once other editors have had a chance to verify that the battle is not only notable but also distinct from that of the now-deleted article, you could either move it to the mainspace yourself, submit it to AfC (which I could expeditiously approve), or you could request a move here. ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:08, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jambi Sultanate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indonesian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Area of focus

Hey Syazwi, I would just like to point out that there are many areas of Brunei still left uncovered to different extent. Joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Brunei could allow other Brunei Wikipedians (Although not many) to pitch in and help or to look out for one another. Some suggestions for biography I could recommend are folk heroes/legends and real people of notability. Another would be historical events, like an agreement between parties, celebrations or possess political significance. Hope this helps!

Wikipedia:WikiProject Brunei/Article requests and Wikipedia:WikiProject Southeast Asia/Requests#Brunei Pangalau (talk) 14:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Syazwi Irfan. Thank you for your work on Hussin Kamaluddin. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:23, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Timeline of Bruneian history

Hello, Syazwi Irfan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Timeline of Bruneian history, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Your edit to Bruneian-Tundun War has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bruneian Navy (1368-1888), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jong and Garay.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lena Ice Cream moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lena Ice Cream. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. C F A 💬 23:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Muara (1578)

Hello, Syazwi Irfan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Muara (1578), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Muara (1578)

Hello, Syazwi Irfan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Battle of Muara".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:42, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bruneian–Tundun War

The article Bruneian–Tundun War has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Most of the sources are tertiary or even quaternary with no cited sources (secondary or primary) within themselves for the claims mentioned in this article. One of the sources even cites Wikipedia from 2011. Please examine the references and the claims in this article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kingdom of Antankarana

Hello, Syazwi Irfan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kingdom of Antankarana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sultanate of Rafaï

Hello, Syazwi Irfan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sultanate of Rafaï, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]