User talk:Sweethavxn

Sweethavxn, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sweethavxn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

March 2021

Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Marion Reimers, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. WP:DOB is to be taken seriously. Toddst1 (talk) 02:47, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:57, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome

Hi Sweethavxn. Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts about editing on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

If you find yourself in a disagreement with another editor, it's best to discuss the matter on the relevant talk page.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 17:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Industry Baby

The reason why I redirected Industry Baby is because the page fails WP:NSONGS and WP:SIGCOV. The reason it was moved to mainspace is because someone requested it at WP:RM/TR, which is not related to the draft/articles for creation process, and therefore does not confirm notability. The draft was never published. Moving back to draftspace/having a requested move discussion is not a good use of everyone's time, as the song will be released in 26 hours and will definitely be notable then. But, the subject is not notable as of now, so I have boldly redirected the page again. As well, no "better" references ([1]) exist as of now, as the song is not released, so we do not have access to reviews, music video synopses and that sort of stuff. The only references we have as of now are the sources that say "Lil Nas X is set to release new Kanye-West produced song featuring Jack Harlow this Friday", and those sources do not contribute to significant coverage. Hope this clears everything up for you! Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 01:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Putting commas before "Jr."

Hi. Please don't do this, as on Wikipedia, we prefer not to do this per the Manual of Style, specifically MOS:JR. Article titles that previously had commas preceding "Jr." or "Sr." had them removed years ago. Thanks. Ss112 09:18, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

❤️

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Thank you for your incredible contributions to Memento Mori (The Weeknd radio show). CitationIsNeeded (talk) 22:37, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CitationIsNeeded (talk) 22:37, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bella Hadid

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. --Hipal (talk) 17:08, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding. I was specifically concerned about this and this

See Wikipedia:PAGESIX. --Hipal (talk) 03:32, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marking edits as minor

Hi. Please don't mark edits like this and this as minor as they most definitely are not minor. Minor edits are when you change little to no bytes of data on an article. Please see Help:Minor edit. Thanks. Ss112 05:34, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ronherry (talk) 18:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Please don't use student publications or blogs as sources, they classified as unreliable sources (WP:RS). A list of reliable sources can be found at WP:ALBUM/SOURCE. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 06:41, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits

I’ve noticed some of your recent edits to The Weeknd could be considered disruptive and unencyclopedic. Please make sure to discuss major edits on the article’s talk page, and refer to the MOS when in doubt. Thanks. CitationIsNeeded ツ 20:04, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Weeknd, you may be blocked from editing. Cautioned and warned many times in the past. CitationIsNeeded ツ 20:34, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond

Pleas respond to User talk:NinjaRobotPirate#Possible sockpuppetry. Otherwise, I'll probably block you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:34, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:55, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Verónica Rodríguez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Verónica Rodríguez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verónica Rodríguez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BD2412 T 19:09, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]