User talk:Swankeyy

Ebenezer Onyeagwu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ebenezer Onyeagwu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition the subject is in question of notability. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 14:28, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm Throast. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Ryan Kavanaugh, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Throast (talk | contribs) 14:09, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Throast, you claims are wrong. I made edits per wikipedia guidelines and used reliable sources which you reverted. Swankeyy (talk) 14:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The information you added regarding Jack Kavanaugh does not reflect the sources you provided. Other concerns have been articulated here. Instead of edit warring, you can start a discussion at the article talk page. Throast (talk | contribs) 14:17, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Edit warring behavior at Ryan Kavanaugh Hello, you currently seem to be involved in an edit war at the Ryan Kavanaugh article. I've provided a reason for my intial revert and per WP:BLPUNDEL, the burden now is on you to demonstrate that your edit is in line with Wikipedia, and specifically BLP, policies. Thank you. Throast (talk | contribs) 14:16, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Swankeyy, I would like to remind you about WP:BLPUNDEL. Please note that you should get consensus to add contentious (contentious by it's nature if removed) material back into the article. While I see you did attempt to discuss it on Throast's talk page; consensus should be obtained before making the edit. In regards to the actual edit, per WP:RSP: Rotten Tomatoes is considered generally reliable for its review aggregation and its news articles on film and TV. Not for its pages on celebrities. Pabsoluterince (talk) 03:53, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pabsoluterince: Rotten Tomatoes is a reliable source as you have confirmed, also the same day, month and year is included on his IMDb here, I don't understand why you should have it deleted when there are multiple sources stating similar information. I read alot about Wikipedia guidelines and I have ensured all my contributions are in line with that. Can you show me any other reliable source that shows a different date of birth. Throast quoted BFI, going by your comment on Rotten Tomatoes can BFI be used as a source here? Swankeyy (talk) 07:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some sources are reliable for certain information but not necessarily for all, as Pabsoluterince explained to you. DOBs are personal info that should be treated with extra care when it comes to sourcing. I would not use BFI as a source for DOBs either, I was just bringing it up to demonstrate that Kavanaugh's DOB is in fact disputed. That being said, I believe the current solution at the article remains the best until his DOB is published by a source that is clearly reliable for DOBs. Throast (talk | contribs) 08:03, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concerns on DOB being treated with extra care, this article from Yahoo mentions his age as 47 years and California as his place of birth, the article was published on January 26, 2022.Swankeyy (talk) 08:08, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to discuss this further, I recommend you open a new thread at Talk:Ryan Kavanaugh. Throast (talk | contribs) 09:31, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock my IP

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Swankeyy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 154.120.80.132. Tried to edit and got this message. Swankeyy (talk) 15:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That IP is indeed a P2P proxy. You will need to turn this off, clear your browser cache, and wait 24 hours to edit. Or, seeing that you edited successfully a few days ago, return to wherever you were when you made those edits. If you have need to use a proxy to edit, please request an IP block exemption per these instructions. 331dot (talk) 17:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello there, Please for maximum cyber safety, it is usually not a good idea to expressly state your (IP) openly. Celestina007 (talk) 21:53, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Elbatrawy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ahmed Elbatrawy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 17:05, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ebenezer Onyeagwu (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please review WP:PAID

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ebenezer Onyeagwu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ebenezer Onyeagwu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CUPIDICAE💕 17:10, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Swankeyy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CUPIDICAE💕 17:10, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ebenezer Onyeagwu (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:RS

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ebenezer Onyeagwu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ebenezer Onyeagwu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Celestina007 (talk) 21:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry warning

Hello, Swankeyy, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 21:39, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Celestina007, kindly explain when you mean editing pattern? I have only made a total edits of 50+, I am just here to contribute. I don't have any other account asides this and no I am not coordinating with any other persons. Swankeyy (talk) 08:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No one has expressly said you engage in sock or meat puppetry, the message left on your TP was done using the agf-sock waring template. Edit pattern refers to how you edit, I believe the definition is self explanatory. If you refute this then fine. Having said I’d like to reiterate that your edit pattern is in utmost variance with your claim but by all means if you do not engage in socking keep it up. Time would tell. Celestina007 (talk) 02:06, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for undisclosed paid editing in violation of the WMF Terms of Use and abusing multiple accounts.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 16:09, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jeff Gross (poker player)

The page Jeff Gross (poker player) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

G5: Special:Permalink/1073175237#RfC: Wikiprofessionals Inc, and paid editing

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Blablubbs (talk) 16:11, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ahmed Elbatrawy

Hello, Swankeyy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ahmed Elbatrawy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ebenezer Onyeagwu

Hello, Swankeyy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ebenezer Onyeagwu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ahmed Elbatrawy

Hello, Swankeyy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ahmed Elbatrawy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:39, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]