User talk:Susan alexa

Santosh Arron moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Santosh Arron, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:51, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Susan alexa

A tag has been placed on User:Susan alexa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Finngall ^talk 17:52, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Santosh Arron

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Santosh Arron, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 18:14, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the content in this article was copied from Elon Musk with mentions of Musk being replaced with "Santosh Arron". Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 18:17, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Santosh Arron

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Santosh Arron, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — Diannaa (talk) 10:54, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Santosh Arron

A tag has been placed on Talk:Santosh Arron, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. enjoyer -- talk 01:16, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Santosh Arron, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Stop recreating made-up articles or you'll be blocked. enjoyer -- talk 01:37, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Santosh Arron

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Santosh Arron, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DanCherek (talk) 15:31, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spencer^T•C 21:33, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Susan alexa. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 11:31, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Account Violation

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Susan alexa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, I didn’t know I shouldn’t have done that. I won’t do it again. I request you to please unblock me from wikipedia. Susan alexa (talk) 20:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One open request at a time please. Daniel Case (talk) 06:41, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Procedurally, I'm going to leave this request open for another CU to deal with. However, I re-blocked you in March for using multiple accounts to evade your block; that should have been enough to tell you that you shouldn't do that. But you did it again, after being blocked, with the account Jessicaaylen. And when that was blocked, you did it again just yesterday with the account Reyanrenolds1, and got yourself blocked over at commons (I've just blocked that account here). So I personally do not believe you when you say that you didn't know it was against the rules. Girth Summit _(blether) 19:30, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Account Violation

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Susan alexa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account has been blocked from editing for abusing multiple accounts. The rules say, "Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons." I didn't edit any articles that were against the rules, and I've created an article about a person, but that too got rejected. I am extremely sorry; I didn't know I was new to Wikipedia, and I have zero experience, but I've got much interest in being a part of Wikipedia. Again I am sorry, I won't do it again. I request you to please unblock me from Wikipedia please. Susan alexa (talk) 01:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There's the standard offer. Edit a sister project for six months and show that you can edit constructively without causing problems. Don't create any more sock puppets on English Wikipedia. Then make another unblock request here. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:41, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.