User talk:Sunaditya

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Sunaditya! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 11:59, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello, I'm DBigXray. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to 2019 Kashmir earthquake seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DBig Xrayᗙ 05:28, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sunaditya, Thank you for emailing me. You have to understand that Wikipedia has to remain Neutral here. I understand what you are saying is followed in the Indian Media. But Wikipedia does not need to follow what is written in Indian Media. Lets say we change AK to PoK, After that a Pakistani editor will object to that and say, J&K article must be renamed to Indian Occupied Kashmir. he will use Pakistani media sources. what is the solution ? The WP:CONSENSUS is to use what neutral third party sources are using. And leave the dispute for the politicians to fix. hope this helps. let me know if you have anything more to say here. This is not a private issue, So I am posting it here instead of emailing it back to you. regards. --DBig Xrayᗙ 12:33, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing?

What's your source for Uttam Mohanty's place of birth? —C.Fred (talk) 18:49, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Check this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wX2A7NPwGjY and go to 17.29 minutes

Odisha Administrative Service moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Odisha Administrative Service, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:43, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Odisha Administrative Service for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Odisha Administrative Service is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odisha Administrative Service until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 11:51, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Aam Aadmi Party, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 14:50, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How sharing the truth has become unconstructive? Is it like we must not add truth which is unpleasant? Sunaditya (talk) 03:09, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sunaditya There is nothing controversial about AAP's foundation day. The news regarding Bhagwant Mann is quite small and unimportant to be included in the party page. If you want to make this edit, first discuss on talk page and achieve a consensus for it. You also need to see WP:NPOV since your edits do not appear to be having a neutral point of view. Dhruv edits (talk) 08:09, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any other significant day that coincides with November 26th? If AAP winning a ward in a municipal election could be added then, why not Bhagwant Mann. After all he is the CM of a major Indian state. Sunaditya (talk) 08:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sunaditya Like I said, if you want to add this, seek consensus on talk page. Dhruv edits (talk) 08:56, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vinai Kumar Saxena. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 08:03, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The information I have shared is discussed in national media. There are multiple incidents where the Aam Aadmi Party alleged corruption against prominent persons of India. When these people have started defamation proceedings against them, Mr. Kejriwal begged for an apology. Here is the link. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/arvind-kejriwals-apology-spree-3-down-30-more-to-go/articleshow/63368956.cms. It was availale in nthe ational media. PIt seems you are too biased towards the Aam Admi Party and do not have a neutral view. Sunaditya (talk) 08:41, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sunaditya This doesn't explain you continuously adding content without a reliable source. Read WP:RS. Dhruv edits (talk) 08:52, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, please share your sources. You are editing messages without giving any source. For you, YouTube is unreliable. Then the Times of India article that I have shared might be unreliable. And who defines what is reliable or unreliable? Is it by whim or certain procedure.The newspaper article clearly explains what happened, and you are saying it is not a reliable source. Whatever I added on the Aam Aadmi party page was also not significant for you. But I could see that AAP's winning municipal election was added. Sunaditya (talk) 08:57, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube is unreliable source. Also see WP:TOI. It's not unreliable 'for me', it is unreliable as per wiki policies. Read WP:RS to understand what a reliable source is. Dhruv edits (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]