Jump to content

Talk:Vinai Kumar Saxena

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regarding Allegations by Aam Aadmi Party against Vinai Kumar Saxsena

[edit]

There were discussions in the media about AAP alleging that Shri Vinai Kumar Saxsena was involved in a currency scam during his tenure at Khadi Commssion. But they haven't provided any proof. https://news.abplive.com/states/khadi-scam-aap-mlas-overnight-protest-l-g-vinai-saxena-delhi-assembly-kvic-2016-saurabh-bhardwaj-black-money-arvind-kejriwal-1550709. Then Shri Vinai Kumar Saxsena had sent legal notices against AAP leaders. Delhi Lieutenant Governor Sends Legal Notice To AAP Leaders For Defamation. I am going to add these lines in the bigraphy. Sunaditya (talk) 08:52, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sunaditya Any information added needs to be accompanied with a reliable source or else it would be reverted. Also see WP:BLP. Dhruv edits (talk) 09:10, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please define what is reliable source. Sunaditya (talk) 09:12, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sunaditya You have been informed twice on your talk page, and once again here. Read WP:RS, Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research before rushing to make edits. Dhruv edits (talk) 09:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also the information needs to be about the topic of the page, i.e. Vinai Kumar Saxsena. Any info about AAP in general that doesn't involve Vinai Kumar Saxsena is irrelevant to this page. Dhruv edits (talk) 09:12, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Then why was the line added that majority of ruling Party MLAs of Delhi assembly have accused him. Which is ruling party in the Delhi assembly? If they have accused, what was Mr. Saxsena's response or media's response that must be added. And, to tell you Wiki doesn't consider or rather wiki contributors to be specific, don't consider government gazette notifications to be reliable source. Sunaditya (talk) 09:19, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sunaditya Vinai Kumar Saxsena's legal response added by you is backed by reliable source so it is not reverted. Everything else is poorly sourced. Dhruv edits (talk) 09:22, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So anything sourced from NDTV is The Hindu is reliable but anything else. Sunaditya (talk) 14:35, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]