User talk:SunDawn/Archives/2022/December
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:SunDawn. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Administrators' newsletter – December 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Consensus has been found in an RfC to automatically place RfAs on hold after one week.
- The article creation at scale RfC has been closed.
- An RfC on the banners for the December 2022 fundraising campaign has been closed.
Technical news
- A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)
Arbitration
- Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 12, 2022 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
- The proposed decision for the 2021-22 review of the discretionary sanctions system is open.
- The arbitration case Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block has been closed.
- The arbitration case Stephen has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 1 December 2022.
- A motion has modified the procedures for contacting an admin facing Level 2 desysop.
Miscellaneous
- Tech tip: A single IPv6 connection usually has access to a "subnet" of 18 quintillion IPs. Add
/64to the end of an IP in Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.
steve requin
It's about Steve Requin page. I used to know this guy during the 1990s decade and I can swear he did what I wrote on his page. I actually searched for citations on the net, but I couldn't found one. I made the changes on his page to warn people about him. I also consider to use others social medias to denounce him. 207.96.178.106 (talk) 18:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hello! Hopefully you have a great day. I understand that what you say might be true, but unsourced content, especially about a living person, can't be used in the Wikipedia. If you have any citations and sources, the content about his sentencing can stay. But if there is no sources, it can't be placed on the article. Have a good day. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 18:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
The Manufacturing of Greta Thunberg (book)
Given WP:Articles for deletion/The Manufacturing of Greta Thunberg (book) and WP:NPOVN#The Manufacturing of Greta Thunberg (book), can you please use a little more caution on your new page patrols? VQuakr (talk) 01:07, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Apologies, that kind of article shouldn’t have passed the review. Have a good day! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:46, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Staring an article from scratch
Sundawn, you were good enough to make a positive comment about my article "Mid-Sussex railways", that you have just curated. Thank you. May I ask for your help in what to do in that situation? I promise I have trawled all through the Wiki help pages and not found an answer. I need to explain the background: I'm sorry to impose on your time. Please excuse a lengthy message.
In railway articles there's often a split between 1) the history of the railway line from A to B, often in the nineteenth century, and 2) the current configuratiion of the line, and the present-day train services on it. Option 2 gets written a lot, perhaps because people can do it from free resources on the internet, whereas option 1 involves purchasing books and doing some painstaking reading.
That was the case here; there was an article "Arun Valley line" that followed option 2 and had a very superficial history section. My article was option 1. Here is the difficulty and my question: there was a redirect, "Mid-Sussex line" which redirected to the Arun Valley line article. "Mid-Sussex line" would have been a perfect title for my article, and my plan was to edit the redirect by adding the text of my article; and make appropriate cross-references in both articles, using "about" functions. However the system wouldn't let me do that, and in the end I started a new article that you have seen. I tried editing the redirect, but my "about" section resolved as "this redirect", and I couldn't get rid of it. I tried "Mid-Sussex Line" (all capitalised) and that had the seame result, even though the capitalised version did not show up in "What Links Here" in the Arun Valley line article. I searched the redirect for a flag to indicate that it was indeed a redirect, but I couldn't find anything.
"Mid-Sussex line" would have been a much better title for my article. Do you know what I should have done to create it that way? Or where I might find the guidance? (I anticipate that this issue may arise again in the future with similar articles.)
Once again I apologise for a lengthy message; thank you for any guidance you may be able to give me. Afterbrunel (talk) 08:14, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hello! Hopefully you have a good day. The way I see it, is that you need to move the article Mid-Sussex railways to Mid Sussex Line, but you can't move it because Mid Sussex Line have been used as a redirect to Arun Valley line. Is this correct? Thank you! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:06, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Martin Guptill
Sir, regarding Martin Guptill article I has gave the source as Reuters website. Plz check it. Chandrimaglass (talk) 05:10, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- It's all good! Thank you for adding the source. If you want, you can remove my warning on your talk page, or I can do it for you. Have a good day! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:16, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
|
Merry Christmas SunDawn/Archives/2022 |
|
Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! |
- Thank you! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:08, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Antisemitism
There is no wat you can deem Zivka a racist and facist. This is clearly antisemitic and could trigger legal repercussions. 2A02:A463:485F:1:95B3:15E6:8E21:6F5F (talk) 09:43, 30 December 2022 (UTC)