User talk:Burbak

August 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2011 England riots was changed by Suijai (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867198 on 2012-08-28T17:52:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:53, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Turha because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 00:07, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bihari Rajputs has been accepted

Bihari Rajputs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, I'm Mahensingha. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bihari Rajputs because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MahenSingha (Talk) 18:49, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bihari Rajputs

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Bihari Rajputs, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Rajput. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Rajput, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MahenSingha (Talk) 19:25, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Biharis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indo-Aryan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Hello, I'm Mahensingha. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bihari Rajputs because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MahenSingha (Talk) 17:55, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Burbak reported by User:Mahensingha (Result: ). Thank you. MahenSingha (Talk) 19:40, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bihari Rajputs, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. MahenSingha (Talk) 19:54, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bihari Rajputs, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. MahenSingha (Talk) 18:11, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

Umm no I didn't, that edit was made by an individual I have no association with. Please prove that it is me who made that post.Burbak (talk) 18:32, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

—SpacemanSpiff 18:23, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is quite clear that you made this edit logged out. Any further disruptive behavior is going to result in you being blocked. —SpacemanSpiff 18:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent removal of maintenance templates after warnings, as you did at Bihari Rajputs. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 23:06, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Bihari Rajputs, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MahenSingha (Talk) 19:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Burbak reported by User:Mahensingha (Result: ). Thank you. MahenSingha (Talk) 19:42, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Spike789 ^Talk 19:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —DoRD (talk) 13:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Burbak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You cannot conclusively trace back my IP to those proxies so that is no reason to block my IP. I did not use those proxies as I have no need to, I have an account and I use that. Unless there is conclusive proof then there is no need to block me.

Decline reason:

Obvious is obvious. Your behavior is the clue. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:43, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(I fixed your unblock request, by the way.) I don't have access to the CheckUser data, but the edits convinced me beyond doubt. I'll leave this for another admin to decide. —DoRD (talk) 23:07, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Purbiya, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bhojpur and Jagdishpur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Adivasi. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 15:49, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Source does not refer to Madhesis or Nepal, please find a source that is relevant.Burbak (talk) 16:43, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ujjainiya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhojpur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

Hi, I don't see any mention of Sher Shah Suri in the reference that you've added to the article. It is necessary to also provide the page number and, ideally, other details as well. Please take a look at this video which explains how to quickly and easily cite a source using the Wikipedia toolbar. You can use that to provide a full citation. Thanks.--Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 15:52, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sher Shah Suri is called Sher Khan in the source, try clicking on it nowBurbak (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ganwaria Rajput, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mithila. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kachwaha

I've reverted your massive removal of content from Kachwaha in December. The issue has been discussed extensively across a range of articles and you really need to read the entirety both of the Kachwaha article and its sources (ie: not just one or two pages from a source) before crashing in like that, sorry. - Sitush (talk) 20:31, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For example, the cited source says "Kushvaha-kshatriya identity was espoused by agricultural communities well known through the Gangetic north for an expertise in small-scale vegetable ... and poppy cultivation. Prominent among them were Kachhi and Murao agriculturalists of central Uttar Pradesh, Kachhvahas of western Uttar Pradesh, and Koiris of Bihar and eastern Uttar Pradesh" ... and so on. Your edit summary ("sources make no actual reference to Kachwahas but merely to a separate group called Kushwahas who they only share a similar sounding name with") is plain wrong, presumably because instead of actually reading that source you instead searched for one particular spelling of the word. - Sitush (talk) 20:42, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm User:Ashim nep. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Madhesh because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ~Ashim nep ^{Chat with me ♽ Contribs}AA 19:07, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Read the source that you have talked about. as you said "You can't just remove sources as you please"; I have not removed any of the sources Please read them i have read both the sources given. AA 20:44, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Madhesh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Toddst1 (talk) 20:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm User:Ashim nep .Please Respond to my discussion in the article Madhesh's talk page Talk:Madhesh.AA 21:44, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Hello, I'm User:Ashim nep. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Madhesh because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ~Ashim nep ^{Chat with me ♽ Contribs}AA 19:44, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Madhesi people

Hello, I'm User:Ashim nep. I wanted to know the reason for undoing my edit in article Madhesi people your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive and complete.As my source and the source that was already there clearly states about the historical status of western Madhesh before Anglo-Nepal war.And if you have issues related to eastern part of Madhesh ,then lets Discuss about it in Talk:Madhesh .If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ~Ashim nep ^{Chat with me ♽ Contribs}AA 19:07, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't Understand you and the thing you talk about. please read the source that you are talking about.Let me cote from the source that you are talking about under iv sub 4 ,"Political Configuration of Madhesh";

"After the incorporation of Madhesh into Nepal in 1769 by King Prithvi Narayan Shah of Gorkha, the map of Tarai was redrawn by the Sugauli Treaty concluded between British India and Nepal in 1816. The treaty caused the people living in Madhesh to remain separately across the international borders dividing India and Nepal. Madheshis have ever since been divided, with no change in their status" ^[1] It clearly says Madhesh along with different small kingdoms were annexed in 1769 by King Prithvi Narayan Shah of Gurkha and made into a new state namely Nepal and was later divided by british after Sugauli Treaty in 1816.AA 20:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Slim Jesus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IagoQnsi (talk) 16:27, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Slim Jesus, you may be blocked from editing. Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Bihar Legislative Assembly election, 2015. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 20:44, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bihari Rajputs, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Suryavanshi and Mithila. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Kachwaha. Sitush (talk) 15:36, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing on caste pages, see the many warnings you have ignored. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=The only warning I was given relates to the Kachwaha page, seems pretty harsh to give a permanent block. The content I removed wasn't even sourced'}}

. Bishonen | talk 22:24, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Burbak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The only warning I was given relates to the Kachwaha page, seems pretty harsh to give a permanent block. The content I removed wasn't even sourced

Decline reason:

Declined on the basis of long term disruption, multiple blocks and sockpuppetry. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:36, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Burbak, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Sro23 (talk) 19:36, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Burbak. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

^ http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/18417/12/12_chapter%204.pdf

[1] ttp://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/18417/12/12_chapter%204.pdf

[1]