User talk:Success think

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Govinda (actor), have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kpddg ^(talk) 14:28, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir, I'll read all this stuff. Success think (talk) 14:32, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Khandoba Mandir

At this stage there is only one draft article for Khandoba Mandir and there are no such articles in the main space, as such the title doesn't require disambiguating to Khandoba Mandir, Jejuri. Dan arndt (talk) 03:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but can you make a redirect from Jejuri had to this article, 'cause this temple is also known by this name, per reflist Success think (talk) 06:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject templates

Please do not put WikiProject banners in section headings, as you did here. Not only are they misplaced (they belong at the top of the page), it breaks the page layout. Also, never add the same WikiProject banner to a given talk page more than once. Make sure that the banner template actually exists before you add it - the WP:PREVIEW feature can help: if you see that you are producing a redlink, the template doesn't exist. I have had to fix up several of these problems in the last few days, all caused by you. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Hello, Success think and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you are added several reviews of Pushpa: The Rise#Critical reception. They needed some copyediting which I did following your tag. I suggest you to go through WP:RECEPTION on how reviews are presented in Wikipedia. Generally speaking, one or two lines per review are enough because many other reviews have to be covered. Long sentences such as this may be avoided in future. Hope this helps. Have a nice day and happy editing! -- Ab207 (talk) 07:08, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Portal bars

You are creating malformed portal bars and putting them in the wrong place. Please request on the talk page that someone add a portal bar. Sundayclose (talk) 22:27, 22 January 2022 (UTC) @Sundayclose: Hi, Good morning, Where is the right place to create portal bar, is it in See also section? & What do you mean by malformed? please explain in simple Eng. Why request someone there is huge backlog of lots of things on WP. Success think (talk) 06:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Goldmines Telefilms Pvt Ltd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Economic Times. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khandoba Mandir (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Khandoba Mandir instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Khandoba Mandir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Khandoba Mandir, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 08:18, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jejuri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jyoti.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Success think! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, These articles are according WP policies ?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maharashtra

Thanks for your work on Maharashtra. I watch the article but somehow things like "Kolhapur and "Deccan" slip through. I commend you for the good detective work.Best regards.Jonathansammy (talk) 16:38, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, this article have have grammatical mistakes and some places it is written in broken English. That's why I placed copyediting templet on this article. Success think (talk) 16:43, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Thanks for your suggestion for Maharashtra. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to change it. We encourage you to be bold in updating pages, because wikis like ours develop faster when everybody edits. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. You can always preview your edits before you publish them or test them out in your sandbox. If you need additional help, check out our getting started page or ask the friendly folks at the Teahouse. Kpddg ^(talk) 08:43, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Success think (talk) 07:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Thanks for agreeing to the discussion on the Maharashta talk page, and improving the article! Happy editing!! Kpddg ^(talk) 09:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Success think! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to add talukas and district in this list ..., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahabaleshwar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afzal Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ripomobo11

User:Ripomobo11 has been repeately warned on Talk page for incompetent editing at many articles (inserting hyperlinks as references and making unreferenced changes to text) and edit warring. If persists, a request that this editor be indefinitely blocked is the next obvious step. David notMD (talk) 11:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have not replied what I said on talk page, 😡 Ripomobo11 (talk) 11:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What your say on other Wikipedia pages that I have given example on talk page

Ripomobo11 (talk) 11:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also warned him, but he is not willing to read Blue links. I think he doesn't understand the meaning of 'Hyperlink'. He is also adding original research, I warned him this not allowed here. I suggest you to block him for 7 days. Success think (talk) 12:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And also the commentators that said these words are also fan for you Ripomobo11 (talk) 13:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not called vandalism, if I have proof of reliable website like ESPN, icc, etc so why I can't write those words Ripomobo11 (talk) 13:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Success think, you are also edit warring, and you need to have a look at WP:NOTVAND which explains what is and is not vandalism. An editor adding inappropriate external links or removing text because they don't understand Wikipedia policies is disruptive and might be blocked for that reason, but is not a vandal. This means that you should not keep reverting Ripomobo11's edits even if they don't use the talk page. Please read WP:EW for more info on this. --bonadea contributions talk 13:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea: I tried to explain, guide him but he was not willing to read policies, he was keep adding original research. I can understand he is new here, he don't know rules of WP. But if you say so, I'll not revert his edits. He was in a edit war with 'David not MD' not with me. I don't like edit wars at all. You guide him on to discuss on talk pages. Success think (talk) 13:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK not for suresh Raina but for Ms dhoni you can easily consider him one of the best wicket keeper batsman ever ,and you can easily write those words for him Ripomobo11 (talk) 01:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I filed a block request for Ripimobo11 at the Administrators' noticeboard. David notMD (talk) 14:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Success think, you said "But if you say so, I'll not revert his edits." I didn't say that exactly. I said that you should not edit war, and asked you to read WP:NOTVAND and to stop saying that disruptive edits are vandalism, when it's obvious that the editor doesn't understand specific policies, and that their command of English isn't particularly strong. A disruptive editor could still be blocked, but not for vandalism. It is an important distinction. --bonadea contributions talk 13:58, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Bonadea:, I, fellow editors like David notMD tried to help him but Ripomobo11 is not in the state of listing or reading policies. He removed sourced lines and added original research/ his POV. He do this kind of activity in 7-8 articles at a time, when he login. Ok, he's not vandal. I also want him to do contribution on WP..Success think (talk) 14:07, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What vandalism

I am now doing just minor edits, what vandalism I have done now Ripomobo11 (talk) 05:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ripomobo11: I already answered this on your talk page. And discuss all your issues on your talk page not mine. You can notify me by writing this - @Sucess T:, I will respond you as soon as possible.Success think (talk) 05:54, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rohit Sharma

Hello. First of all, I've seen the outcome of the SPI and I'm satisfied that the investigation found no wrongdoing on your part. I apologise for putting you through that but the tone of your message on my talk page reminded me very strongly of 256. Anyway, I've removed the SPI notice I placed here and we can move forward.

As regards Rohit Sharma's article in particular, and the majority of articles in general, I suggest you read MOS:LEADCITE. While citations can be required in the lead, it is in practice unusual to have them there if they are present in the narrative. The lead is a summary of the narrative and does not contain the same depth of detail. The Sharma article has been reviewed and promoted to our WP:GA status so you are very unlikely to find any issues there unless they have been introduced recently. That, too, is now unlikely because the article is indefinitely protected from all but experienced users.

Everything in the lead of Rohit's article is replicated in more detail within the narrative and sources are cited in the narrative. So, it is unnecessary to repeat the same citations in the lead because they would be superfluous. There has been some discussion this year about whether Rohit is one of the greatest limited overs batsmen and it was because of this that the article had the protection imposed. We decided in the end to acknowledge him as "one of the most outstanding batsmen in limited overs cricket" and the sources for that assessment are Wisden India and the Hindustan Times – see refs #82 and #83. I've no doubt at all that many other sources will say the same because, well, he is a great player.

If you feel strongly that these citations and others should be in the lead, then you must gain WP:CONSENSUS by presenting and discussing your case at the article talk page. You would be very unlikely to succeed, in my opinion, because the article has had several contributors who are, as far as anyone can tell, happy with it as it is. Since Rohit became captain of the Indian Test team, the only real activity in the article has been updating his career stats when he plays his latest match.

I hope this is useful. Apologies again for the SPI but it is always as well to be sure about such things and it does mean you have a clean slate if anyone else should suspect you of anything. Let me know if I can be of further help but please be aware that I do go AWOL for days at a time. Good luck and all the best. No Great Shaker (talk) 09:48, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks mate!! All the best for you too Ripomobo11 (talk) 09:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm Theroadislong. An edit that you recently made to Zaza Korinteli seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:22, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ms dhoni

I am going to add well regarded in Ms dhoni article. I will add 5 reference of reliable sources as it is given in other wp pages of player like viv Richard etc Ripomobo11 (talk) 09:57, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ripomobo11: You suppose to write this at that article's talk page not mine. You can WP:Ping me. Success think (talk) 09:59, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK Ripomobo11 (talk) 10:00, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanku

I leave Wikipedia, because I am brainless Ripomobo11 (talk) 15:24, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ripomobo11 blocked, per the Administrators' noticeboard discussion. David notMD (talk) 10:41, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Success think! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to write on my user page ?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Success think! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is this not allowed ?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chandrarao More

Hi Success think. The circumstances of Chandrarao More's killing are controversial because some scholars consider it to be treacherous murder while some don't. It is not really important because it did not had any lasting effect on the Maratha history. We need to consider 'due weight'. We need to utilize the space for more important things. Akshaypatill (talk) 14:25, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@Akshaypatill:, But the article Shivaji I, direct readers to More (clan) article in the name of C.More. As per my studies Chandrarao was not a name and was a title of nobels of Javali, they ruled Javali for 8 pidhi. While traveling to Pratapgad, I saw the lota of books about Chadrarao More in their in book stores, from taht I think Chadrarao More and his Dynasty have part of history of Javali and Chandrarao More deserves a article. More is a surname not a clan, not just like it written in that article.Success think (talk) 04:27, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may have made your opinion based on local books. Have a look at - [1] Akshaypatill (talk) 05:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Akshaypatill:, Hi once again, I'm not able to read, beacuse the linke showing empty pages. I actually didn't read the books there but only saw lots books in display, which have titles : 'Who was Javali's Chandrarao More'. And dynasty of Javali have long history.Success think (talk) 05:15, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then I will request you to respect the judgments of other editors who have knowledge about the subject. I can mail you a pdf of the pages if you want. Akshaypatill (talk) 05:32, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, here is the pdf - [2]. Akshaypatill (talk) 05:36, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unnecessary tagging

Please can you not tag sourced content as original research? I noticed you tagged a number of articles with sourced content as OR. If you have opposing views, your personal views are not not relevant. Please refrain yourself as it creates unnecessary work for wikipedia editors. I will now have to go through other articles(other than More clan) where you have put inappropriate tags. I suggest you use the talk page of More clan for discussion if you have concerns.LukeEmily (talk) 13:56, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @LukeEmily:, I only tagged the paras who seems like OR, There no such thing like difference of opinion reason behind this. If the para or lines don't have backing of secondary reliable sources and it is written like POV that obvious it will appear like a OR. WP policy give editors right to tag uncited material by 'citation needed' and 'OR'. There is no such that, I placed the tags'cause I have diff opinion. I just want to single the editor, who wrote them that, please provide reliable refs, so anyone can verify, Happy editing.Success think (talk) 14:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My areas of interest

I am a citizen of the United States by birth, a descendent of Eastern European Jews by ancestry, and a biochemist by training and career. On occasion I have commented on drafts and articles about India that were posted at Teahouse, but I have no knowledge nor interest in putting in more time in that area. My User page lays out my areas of interest. David notMD (talk) 14:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Good morning @David notMD: ok, I got it. I saw your name on lots of India related articles due to edits and clean-up work, thaught your Indian or expert, have interest about Indian articles, sorry to bother you, Happy editing. Success think (talk) 14:17, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jaoli State, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jawali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Kundan Ravindra Dhayade per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kundan Ravindra Dhayade. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 12:57, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sanket Mhatre

Hello, Success think. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sanket Mhatre, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:04, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sanket Mhatre (Voice actor) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sanket Mhatre (Voice actor), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As the correct main space title is protected, please WAIT FOR THE DRAFT TO BE ACCEPTED. Ravensfire (talk) 14:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]