User talk:Subhendupattnaik

Welcome!

Hello, Subhendupattnaik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 13:24, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tata Business Support Services may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| caption = Let's Simplify :)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:24, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cigniti (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please avoid adjectives of praise or success, do not include minor awards, remove the list of partnerships--all these are signs of promotional writing

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cigniti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cigniti, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 02:19, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Subhendupattnaik! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 02:19, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Subhendupattnaik (talk) 08:45, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have made the edits. What you suggested is right. Partnerships do not mean anything on a Wiki page. Hope this version looks reasonable to be approved. Please let me know.

AfC notification: Draft:Cigniti has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cigniti. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 23:06, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cigniti (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cigniti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cigniti, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 20:52, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Cigniti concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Cigniti, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cigniti

Hello, Subhendupattnaik. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cigniti".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 15:25, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cigniti Technologies moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cigniti Technologies, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 18:54, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Subhendupattnaik. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 12:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have not created any duplicate account neither have i any connection with Allabhraham.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Subhendupattnaik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I logged into wiki today after I saw the emails in my Gmail account. I have not created any duplicate accounts and my account deletion is extremely unfair. After this, if you still want to keep my account suspended, I will leave it on you, the esteemed editors of wiki. Why would you just block me and penalise me for something I did not commit. If you still do it, that is unfair. I can't prove that I did not anything wrong. but I feel this is rash decision making just because there is power and trust bestowed on you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Allabhraham I have no connection with this user id above. This ID has been editing multiple pages which have no connection with me. I have been very clear and upfront about my relationship with Cigniti, which I could have not disclosed. However, i did disclose that and created the page. I have done multiple changes to the page based on review feedback received as well. If someone like me who upholds the rules of the site is penalised with indefinite block and not allowed to create a page, then what is the value of disclosure. I would request wiki editors to remove the block and help me in creating an informative page for my company. In fact, I have already done multiple changes and i am happy to do more based on feedback you suggest. Subhendupattnaik (talk) 11:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There's clearly some meatpuppetry going on here, whether it is with the user named here or not. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 12:58, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is unethical and unfair

You can't just block me and penalise me for something I did not commit. If you still do it, that is unfair. I have nothing to prove but I feel this is rash decision making just because there is power and trust bestowed on you. Subhendupattnaik (talk) 18:02, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not for merely providing information, and is not a place for companies to tell the world about themselves. This is an encyclopedia that summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage say about a company, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable company. You declared a COI, but you need to make the stricter paid editing declaration.

How would Allabhraham know about the draft you wrote in order to move it? 331dot (talk) 20:17, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understand and agree. Though I did not know Allabhraham, I did reach out to someone to review the draft and see what we could fix in that so that it could be published. If I had to publish it again anyhow, without making any changes, i would not have waited so long. I genuinely wanted to improve the copy so I had reached out. Now that I know and realize I should have made a stricter declaration, could you please unblock me? I would like to present info which is truly valuable and not a work of self adulation after making the declaration stricter. Thank you for clarifying and guiding me. --Subhendupattnaik (talk) 20:30, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did this reaching out occur off-wiki? 331dot (talk) 20:51, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Subhendupattnaik (talk) 19:41, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So the person you reached out to is Allabhraham? (even if you didn't know that at the time) 331dot (talk) 20:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, I have not reached out to Allabhraham. Subhendupattnaik (talk) 12:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cigniti Technologies

Hello, Subhendupattnaik. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cigniti Technologies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:39, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]