User talk:Stoubora
Welcome!
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Hallfield School (June 20)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hallfield School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! Stoubora,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ringbang (talk) 16:59, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Hallfield School (July 11)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hallfield School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
December 2016
[edit]Hello, I'm Ronz. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you.
See also WP:COI in case it might apply. --Ronz (talk) 21:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi Rozz, these were genuine citations which were relevant to the pages in question. How else is one to submit worthwhile citations?
You raise other citations which I shared for chamelondirect.com years ago. My question is, was this reported by another user triggering this type of response I need to know because I suspect a user who I'm connected with has tried to report this as COI and it really isn't on my part.
You'll see from my usage I've always tried to provide useful citations and only relevant ones.
- I'm not aware of other reports, nor which other editors have removed the links you have been adding.
- Worthwhile citations that are unlikely to be disputed are written by reliable sources, are independent of the subject matter, and provide context/analysis/depth in coverage (especially historical context). --Ronz (talk) 17:49, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Conflict of interest policy
[edit]Hello, Stoubora. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
- instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
- when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 16:36, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Hallfield School
[edit]Hello, Stoubora. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Hallfield School".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 06:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Brindley Twist Tafft James
[edit]Your article has been moved from mainspace to Draft:Brindley Twist Tafft James. Please proceed to make your article ready to become a part of this encyclopedia. Thank you very much for your efforts and contributions! Paine Ellsworth put'r there 15:47, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stoubora, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
SmartSE (talk) 12:20, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stoubora. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:42, 2 August 2017 (UTC) |