Jump to content

User talk:Stevenmitchell213

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wolfgang Baer (January 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tagishsimon (talk) 01:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Stevenmitchell213! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tagishsimon (talk) 01:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Conscious action theory for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Conscious action theory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conscious action theory until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:11, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wolfgang Baer (May 29)

[edit]

{{subst:Afc decline|full=Draft:Wolfgang Baer|cv=no|reason=reason|details=His papers have almost no citations. He does not meet the requirements of WP:PROF. I can't find independent sources that would allow him to meet {{WP:GNG]].|reason2=|details2=|comment=|sig=yes}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wolfgang Baer has been accepted

[edit]
Wolfgang Baer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:34, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wolfgang Baer for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wolfgang Baer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolfgang Baer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tercer (talk) 12:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]