User talk:StephenN17

Image copyright problem with Image:Cher_Love_Hurts_Tour_1.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Cher_Love_Hurts_Tour_1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MER-C 10:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cher_Love_Hurts_Tour_10.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cher_Love_Hurts_Tour_10.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fpt 16:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Cher_Love_Hurts_Tour.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cher_Love_Hurts_Tour.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Cher_Love_Hurts_Tour_9.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cher_Love_Hurts_Tour_9.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 01:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cher_Love_Hurts_Tour_9.jpg

I have tagged Image:Cher_Love_Hurts_Tour_9.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 01:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Cher_Love_Hurts_Tour_9.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Cher_Love_Hurts_Tour_9.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 01:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 4.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:10, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 10.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 10.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 14:28, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 14:29, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 14:29, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 3.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 14:29, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 4a.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 4a.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 14:30, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 5.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 5.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 14:30, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 6.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 6.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 14:30, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 8.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 8.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 14:31, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 7.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 7.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 14:31, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour Main.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour Main.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 14:32, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 9.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cher Love Hurts Tour 9.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 14:32, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CHERLASVEGAS2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CHERLASVEGAS2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:24, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Cher Believe in Las Vegas.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cher Believe in Las Vegas.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:46, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cher at the Colloseum 'Believe'.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cher at the Colloseum 'Believe'.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

United World Chart

Please do not add the United World Chart, or any other chart listed in WP:BADCHARTS, to any article, as you did here.—Kww(talk) 16:41, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:Safe Trip Home

I removed U.S.-centric component charts per WP:CHARTS, if you care to check the edit history [1]. If you feel the need to "report" this then go ahead, but the others, which were removed by a different editor, will need to be sourced, as will the sales figures. - eo (talk) 01:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok

Now I see my Tourbook.

User:Kekkomereq4 (talk)

Cher at the Colosseum

In regard to the table in this article, I wonder if we can come up with a design for the table that will satisfy everyone. The problem is that I don't think it adds anything to have three columns in the table repeating the same data on every line because that information is not changing. Suppose we created a table about a tour in which the performer gave concerts at various locations within the United States, but did not go out of the country -- would we really need a column that said that the country was "United States" on every line? In that case, we could just put a sentence at the start of the table that said that the tour was within the United States. Similarly, if Cher is only performing this show at one venue in one city in one country, I don't see what benefit we get from repeatedly saying that each show is at the Colosseum in Las Vegas in the United States -- that isn't going to change. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 23:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Love Hurts Tour

An article that you have been involved in editing, Love Hurts Tour has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments here . If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Xwomanizerx (talk) 03:57, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Burlesque (soundtrack)

Your edit listed position 12 where I believe the source says 17. If you have a different source, do add it, but please don't add information directly against a source. If I am misunderstanding the source, you should say so in the edit summary. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk)

Hi, you didn't specify what chart you were talking about, or your user name. I take it you are talking about the German albums chart. I've put a new source stating the recent chart, which proves Burlesque was no.12 last week. --StephenN17 (talk) 18:20, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for forgetting to sign last time. I don't remember what chart it was, I just ask that any chart position you add will be backed up by a reliable source. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 18:12, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

INOCA

This appears to be a private award given by an inconsequential website. You addition has now been reverted by three separate editors. Discuss this on the talk page if you really think it needs to be included, but do not edit war by simply reinserting it again.—Kww(talk) 20:46, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced charts

If another editor has removed material because it is unsourced, it cannot be restored until you provide a source. See WP:BURDEN. There's no reason to ever add unsourced material to articles.—Kww(talk) 18:35, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BADCHARTS

Will you please review WP:BADCHARTS and not add charts listed there to articles? http://latinmusic.about.com/gi/o.htm?zi=1/XJ&zTi=1&sdn=latinmusic&cdn=entertainment&tm=2&gps=243_480_1225_790&f=00&tt=14&bt=0&bts=0&zu=http%3A//www.hot100brasil.com/ is just a link to hot100brasil.com, which is listed there.—Kww(talk) 16:51, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're right

You're right, I didn't look at the weeks before the official release. Sorry. --Greeneyed soul (talk) 12:26, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you find someone else?

Hi, I reverted your change of the Aussie peak for Cher's cover of "I Found Someone" back to 17 from 8, per the source cited there. I do notice, however, that she is listed as being one of the top 50 singles of the year, which is bizarre because not only does the cited source for the country's chart say the peak was 17 but it says she debuted there and then fell quickly off the charts 5 weeks later. I was curious, because there are known to be anomalies with year-end charts; for example, in very rare instances a record can peak at a modest number but linger on the charts for months, or enjoy a re-release or other resurgence that does not take it higher but which adds to its yearly points, and thereby make it onto a year-end chart. Is there a different chart you're using where she peaked at 8? Of course we need to have a solid and verifiable source to cite in order to override the legitimate source already in the article. I will watch your page here for a respone. Best, Abrazame (talk) 07:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, basically ARIA didn't start their official charts until June 1988. Before that, it was the Australian Chart Report or the Kent Music Report as some called it who would compile the charts, as stated on the Wikipedia page for ARIA Charts. As ARIA didn't start until June 1988, I Found Someone was at no.17 in the charts at the time ARIA started compiling their charts. However, the song was actually released in January 1988 and had reached no.8 in the charts. By going to the link below, you will see that the song was actually released in January 1988 and reached no.8 spending 29 weeks on the chart. This was taken from an Australian Chart Book (1970-1992) and is an official source. It's from a forum but the page has been scanned out so you will see that the song actually reached no.8 before the ARIA chart was created. This is also supported by the following site (http://top100singles.blogspot.com/) By going to every top 100 single in 1988, you'll see I Found Someone peaked at no.8 in 22/2/88.

Edit: Wikipedia won't let me post the link to the forum, so could you please send me a message so I can send you the link? My email address is stephensemail2004@yahoo.co.uk

Thanks, StephenN17 (talk) 11:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, no problem. I do now recall that as being what happened there, and I visited the link you gave. No offense, but for editorial reasons, when I registered here I made the choice to conduct all my discussions of Wikipedia-related matters publicly on Wiki talk pages.

This would not be my approach in every situation, but in light of the link and my recollection, I don't challenge your assertion, I don't need to see the scan. The article has other data points without refs, but extraordinary circumstances like having a contradictory ref about a specific data point (even one we now know to be erroneous) suggests that to prevent someone else from finding and re-adding the #17, and having to go through all this again, seeing as how you have the scan, you should fill in a cite book tag with whatever data you can based upon the scan and where it originally comes from (meaning the book, not the forum). If you're unfamiliar, one example of a cite book tag is the following between double braces like {{ }}:

You don't need to fill in every field of a tag (there are more, I gave you an abridged one) and blank fields will not appear, but of course you need a title, which you have, and in the case of an esoteric book like this, a couple other relevant things. As this is a book of charts it won't have an author per se but it should have an editor listed in place of the author field, and a publisher. If you don't have a page number I would substitute "pages" with "chart date" and put in the week you note it peaked. It's not as much about adhering to everything in the tag as it is about providing a logical if not specific location in a legitimate book, so any interested or challenging party who can track the book down doesn't have to spend extra time paging through. Best, Abrazame (talk) 08:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to I Hope You Find It may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| Germany ([[Media Control Charts]])<ref>[http://www.charts.de/song.asp?artist=Cher&title=I+Hope+You+Find+It+%2F+Woman%27s+World&cat=s&

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:44, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Avril Lavigne (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:18, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Avril lavigne

No, China's source: UNSUPPORTED OR EMPTY REGION: China, and Taiwán isn't reliable. Biagio2103 (talk) 20:06, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Without any reliable source, that's irrelevant here. And, sales not necessarily mean certification. Biagio2103 (talk) 22:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Avril Lavigne (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:01, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Programme viewers sources

Hi, When you add a source you should generally make sure it's "log-in/register free" as it's just helpful to the readers,
Since I never explained in the edit summary thought best I explain here,
Cheers, →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 20:25, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cher at the Colosseum

Hey Stephen, someone vandalized the Cher at the Colosseum page, I tried to restore the prior info as much as I could. Could you please restore the reported gross and other info if you have the draft of the page please. Thanks! --Uncleangelo (talk) 17:43, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for letting me know! I've changed it back to the correct figures now, it's really annoying that there's sad people out there that want to mess about with pages! --StephenN17 (talk) 14:00, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dressed to Kill Tour (Cher), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albany. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, StephenN17. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, StephenN17. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Your recent editing history at Dancing Queen (album) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ss112 18:42, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you made one or more edits to an article, Gimme! Gimme! Gimme! (A Man After Midnight), concerning the updates of review statistics, box office numbers, sports statistics, or some other frequently updated data with a fixed web address, but you did not update the |access-date= parameter in the citation template. The |access-date= parameter is the full date when the content pointed to by the URL was last verified to be working and supporting the text being cited in the article. This means that the parameter needs to be updated whenever the content is updated. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ss112 15:04, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I forgot to put the access date, shoot me now! Instead of reverting you could have just adjusted it but some people like to be sarcastic and rude don't they! Don't bother writing on my page again. StephenN17 (talk) 20:24, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, StephenN17. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dido Safe Trip Home.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dido Safe Trip Home.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 18:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dido Safe Trip Home.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dido Safe Trip Home.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TheRichest.com as a source

Hi StephenN17 . I noticed that you recently used therichest.com as a source for biographical information in List of Cher concerts. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that it does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. You may want to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 18:25, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hipal, I removed it as she was not paid $180 million to perform in Las Vegas. It was reported as $60 million when she first started and afterwards reports mistakenly said $60 million per year which was impossible. It doesn't really matter which source is reported as it's only a guess, no-one knows what she was paid for the shows. If you're going to change the source that's fine but don't put it back to the incorrect figure of $180 million. StephenN17 (talk) 19:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All I'm doing is removing an unreliable source. --Hipal (talk) 22:29, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well no source is reliable, anyway I've put a different link there now to reference the more realistic pay of $60 million StephenN17 (talk) 00:15, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dido Safe Trip Home.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dido Safe Trip Home.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]