User talk:Kekkomereq4

Welcome! Hello, Kekkomereq4, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -Phoenixrod (talk) 19:24, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Cher. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not remove "dead link" notations from sources. This prevents regular editors from determining what sources need to be replaced. Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your uploads

Good day. I see that you have uploaded a number of images to Wikipedia. First off, thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, there are some guidelines that we need to follow with copyrighted images. Specifically, you need to add a source for the image (a link to a website will do), a copyright tag (there are some listed at WP:ICT), and a rationale explaining why we can use a copyrighted image (explained at WP:NFURG). I see that your images fail to include one of these. Please stop uploading images and address the concerns listed above. If you need assistance, you can ask at the help desk. If you do not fix these images, and you continue to make bad uploads, you will be blocked and your images will be deleted. Thanks for your contributions! STBotI (talk) 18:59, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cher

Hi, I wrote a rather long post to you at the Talk:Cher page. I notice you've edited the article since then, but have not responded to that post. Is it your intention not to? Abrazame (talk) 10:30, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Love Hurts Tour

I've replied to your comments on the Love Hurts Tour GA review on my talk page. H1nkles (talk) 13:30, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I've made some final comments and requests regarding this GA review. Please take a look when you get a chance and let me know what you think. I'd like to wrap this up as much as you would I'm sure. H1nkles (talk) 21:00, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cher lists

Hello, and thanks for contacting me. I wasn't sure exactly how you wanted me to review the article, so I'll point out some issues I noticed here. I reworded the lead for the concert tour list as its common practice now to not begin lists with "This is a list...". If your ultimate goal is to get these to featured list status, then the lead and history sections will need to be expanded for this list. Keep looking for sources, perhaps older newspaper articles that cover the tours to find additional details to add. For the filmography, the lead will also need to be expanded, and additional sources are needed for "Film roles associated with Cher". In addition, the "Music from motion pictures" table needs to be sorted so that the older songs are listed first, just like the other tables. The Internet Movie Database can't be used as a source, but you can list it as an external link. Try and replace all IMDB links with new sources. If your goal is FL, then have editors who also work on Cher articles check them over for accuracy, look to other similar FLs, and start a peer review. Hopefully this is helpful, and if you have additional questions or need help, let me know. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 17:56, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cher noms

Hi, thank you for contributing to topics relating to Cher. I saw you nominated several Cher album articles for good article status, but I wanted to tell you that I'm concerned with the sources cherscholar.com and homepages.ihug.com.au because I'm not sure how they fulfil Wikipedia:Reliable sources. What's the rationale for them being included as reliable sources? Best wishes Hekerui (talk) 18:37, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cher articles at Good Article nominations

Hi there, I have tagged the Cher articles you have put up at GAN for review. I intended to 'quickfail' most of them, but I thought I should drop by here first, because I was not sure how familiar you are with the processes etc at Good Article Nomination. I saw the previous post from Hekerui, and s/he raises an important issue. Take a look at Wikipedia:Good article criteria. There are several criteria that your Cher album articles are tending not to meet. The main ones are:

1) "the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct" These Cher album articles tend to have prose problems. I encourage you to approach some other editors you find working on Cher-related topics, and invite them to help you with the prose - get them to copyedit the album articles you've worked on.

2) "it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons". I have only reviewed one article in detail so far, but there were significant omissions in terms of citations for facts and quotes in the article.

3) "reliable sources" - please check out the guideline on reliable sources. This is going to be crucial for you if you are going to get any of these articles promoted. Most of the sources you are using look like they do not meet these standards - they are web pges produced by individuals or groups of fans and are not peer-reviewed; or they are official fan sites. These won't in general qualify as reliable sources. There are sites you have used that are reliable: like the Canadian archives. Also, there are a lot of published books and magazine articles about Cher and her career - use these.

4)"it addresses the main aspects of the topic". First off, I want to say thank you for all these new articles - they have added a lot of information about a major popular artist of the late 20th century; information that simply wasn't here before you got to work, so that is great. To be promoted to GA, they are going to need more detail in general, on tracks, on production, and on critical reception, and I encourage you to create sections on each major topic. That said, a lot more detail isn't needed. But they are likely to be too brief at present to rate as GA.

Of the four poiints above, the first three are crucial - the fourth is a judgement call, and other editors may take a different view to me. I have tagged all the Cher album articles at GAN saying I will review them. I have reviewed the first - Foxy Lady - and put it on hold. See my comments there for a general idea of the issues. Some of the others have more serious problems than Foxy Lady and I would normally 'quickfail' them because of serious referencing problems. I will leave it for a few days while you work out what you want to do. You might like to withdraw them for now and work on them, then re-nominate; or you might like to leave them and quickly try to improve them, maybe with the help of other editors, and come back to me next week. Let me know what you think. Regards. hamiltonstone (talk) 12:20, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. After hearing of your plight, I left a message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rock music about your Cher articles, in hope that one or more editors might come to your aid. It doesn't look like they have unfortunately. I must give you credit for achieving a lot in your second language and with limited materials. You've done well. However, I don't think any of the articles will pass at GA as they are, for the reasons outlined above. Can I suggest you withdraw them at present? That would involve deleting each one from the list at WP:GAN, along with my review tag, and in the edit summary window, typing "withdrawing (article name)". Leave "Foxy Lady" there for now - i need to work out how todeal with that one now the review has been partly written. Please do keep improving the articles, and keep an eye out for other editors who you could ask if they would help out. I would encourage you to split the album articles up into sections as suggested in the Foxy Lady review. I know you have some sections now, I'm suggesting that you change to the sorts of sections more commonly used in album articles - background, tracks, singles / hits, critical reception / impact on career. Regards, hamiltonstone (talk) 03:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AMANDA LEAR

Hello, thanks for improving Amanda Lear discography :-) According to me, Back in Your Arms is not a compilation - all songs were re-recorded, they contain new vocals, and only 3 or 4 previously known tracks were added. Amanda herself claims Brief Encounters is her 15th album. Yes, in fact it is, but only with Back in Your Arms. Please give me some feedback what do you think about it. 1000MHz (talk) 09:35, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,I think that the album is a compilation because it contains songs previous recorded for others olds albums, with two remix and one unreleased song. According with Lear Brief Encounters is her 15th album (you got the cit?) but she also released the 1985 EP "A L" and the reissue version of Heart, "Tendance" with two new songs. However, can you see the Brief Encounters page and correct all my grammar errors? P.S. Why you have delete the Canadian album chart? Kekkomereq4 (talk) 21:24, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted it, because there was no info about peak positions in Canada in that cited web. I'll check Brief Encounters soon. 1000MHz (talk) 04:50, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kekkomereq4. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Peer review/Hell on Wheels (song)/archive1.
Message added 03:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 03:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

With Love, Chèr

Hi,
That article uses both Chèr and Chér at various points when stating the title. Is there some official source that is consistent on this minor detail?
Varlaam (talk) 15:53, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject

Hi Kekkomereq! Thank you for the invitation. I've never started or been associated with a Wikiproject and so I am reading the article Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide. What do you see my participation being? Abrazame (talk) 11:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. What I meant by that last sentence is: what is it you are asking me to do? I am actually trying to reduce the time I spend online, but if there is some way I can be of assistance when other, more urgent matters are not present, then I'd be happy to check in, review your work, discuss things with you, etc. Abrazame (talk) 03:50, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cher albums

Context: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cher_albums_discography&curid=4573304&diff=343334461&oldid=343309135

You understand why I put the big batch of content on the Cher albums discography, right? tedder (talk) 17:02, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cher at the Colosseum

Hi,
Please can you not delete information in the box office charts on the Cher at the Colosseum page, as the information is correct.
StephenN17 (talk)

Orphaned non-free image File:Takemhpriso1co1cover.JPEG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Takemhpriso1co1cover.JPEG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:42, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Carmen Russo playmen June 1982.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Carmen Russo playmen June 1982.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 08:56, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cher - Hell on Wheels clip.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cher - Hell on Wheels clip.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 15:06, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alvideoclip.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alvideoclip.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:01, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cher-Holdin-Out-For-Lo-176656.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cher-Holdin-Out-For-Lo-176656.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:17, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cher - Hell on Wheels (Japan).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cher - Hell on Wheels (Japan).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 16:33, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Takepriso1998.JPEG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Takepriso1998.JPEG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 16:37, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Skin Deep (Cher song) alternative cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Skin Deep (Cher song) alternative cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:52, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:If I Could Turn Back Time - 2001 vinyl remix.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:If I Could Turn Back Time - 2001 vinyl remix.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 03:15, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cher at the 1988 Academy Awards.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cher at the 1988 Academy Awards.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 04:48, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Ch3son.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ch3son.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:54, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:CherSpecial2.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CherSpecial2.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:43, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Cherdollalternative.JPEG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cherdollalternative.JPEG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:59, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Love Hurts Tour

An article that you have been involved in editing, Love Hurts Tour has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments here . If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Xwomanizerx (talk) 03:56, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on List of films considered the worst

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of films considered the worst. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:54, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cher songs Part 2

Template:Cher songs Part 2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 16:16, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Cher-66.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cher-66.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 07:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The Scarlet Letter

I'll try to weigh in some time in the next few days. I just bought a house and don't have Internet there yet, so I only have it at work and can very seldom edit Wikipedia this week. What is the situation with The Scarlet Letter right now? How many say it should stay, how many stay it should go? — Hun ter Ka hn 17:45, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Help?

I'll swing in as soon as I can to add my two cents. If you think it's the same user using multiple accounts, however, you should file for a sockpuppet investigation. As per WP:SOCK, a user is generally only allowed one account. And if you're right and this is one user using these three accounts, chances are he/she has even more accounts that we don't know about. I've never filed a sockpuppet investigation, so I'm not really sure how it all works, but I'd strongly encourage you to take a look at it. — Hun ter Ka hn 00:21, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see you started an investigation. I just weighed in with my two cents there. However, I see that IamTorgo hasn't been notified of the investigation. I think it's only fair to let him (and the other accounts alleged to be his socks) know it's going on so he/they has/have a chance to defend himself. — Hun ter Ka hn 13:59, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion request

We do not normally delete user talk pages, though you are welcome to blank it if you like (the history is needed for the record). Nor do we delete accounts: if you want to abandon this account, you can simply stop using it. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:30, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mego Sonny & Cher Toys for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mego Sonny & Cher Toys is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mego Sonny & Cher Toys until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:05, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added some newspaper references to the article.

Forgive me, one of the weaknesses of the article is that the earlier references may seem to many contributors as not rreally reliable sources. Less might be more. The article might survive if the material that only referenced the fan sites were excised. Geo Swan (talk) 03:54, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cher lovehurts alternatecover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cher lovehurts alternatecover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:54, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MGreggcher01.JPEG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MGreggcher01.JPEG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:20, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Take Me Home Tour.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Take Me Home Tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:24, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LoveHurts-144.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LoveHurts-144.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:24, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cher in DKOLS.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cher in DKOLS.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:40, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cher

Hey, you should take a look on Cher's article at the Wikipedia in portuguese. It's well ilustrated, very well written, complete and have a big number of references. It's also a featured article. You may translate it to english. Lordelliott (talk) 20:20, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cher

File:Cher-I-Found-Someone-135614.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cher-I-Found-Someone-135614.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:04, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:BelieveTourStills-140.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:BelieveTourStills-140.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cher-all-or-nothing-and-dove.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Cher-all-or-nothing-and-dove.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cheraon.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Cheraon.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:SFTLeurope.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SFTLeurope.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 08:12, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:LivingProofStill-52-1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:LivingProofStill-52-1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:22, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stinkers

Good news, a proposed deletion may be removed if an editor has any legitimate reason for declining it. the reason for the PROD was no refs. you have provided refs. You may now safely remove the PROD notice at the top of the page, and include in your edit summary the reason: "i added refs, and believe this award to be notable" or words to that effect. Then, you, or me, or anyone may WP:AFD the article, where a discussion will occur before action is taken. I think this is notable, but you have done enough to avoid a PRODDED deletion, at least. good work.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kekkomereq4. You have new messages at Fandraltastic's talk page.
Message added 17:27, 31 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Fandraltastic (talk) 17:27, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lady in the Water (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cindy Cheung

Twister (1996 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kathleen Kennedy

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:46, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Bloodhounds of Broadway (1989 film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:04, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I stated similar here. Flyer22 (talk) 15:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anaconda (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Indecent Proposal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Wilson

Shining Through (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Wilson

Sweet November (2001 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Wilson

The Bodyguard (1992 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Wilson

The Jayne Mansfield Story (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Wilson

The Specialist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Wilson

White Comanche (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Wilson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Pirate (Cher single - cover art).jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Pirate (Cher single - cover art).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 21:03, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Don't Hide Your Love (Cher single - cover art).jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Don't Hide Your Love (Cher single - cover art).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 21:04, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Take Me Home (Cher song).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Take Me Home (Cher song).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:51, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:If I Could Turn Back Time - 2001 vinyl remix.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:If I Could Turn Back Time - 2001 vinyl remix.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:01, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Half-Breed (song) video.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Half-Breed (song) video.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:46, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CheralternativChetr71.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CheralternativChetr71.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:49, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:With love original cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:With love original cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cherrudy2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cherrudy2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Amanda Lepore

Template:Amanda Lepore has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 01:26, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Uninhibited for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Uninhibited is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uninhibited until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HĐ (talk) 05:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Uninhibited by Cher.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Uninhibited by Cher.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LiveattheMirage.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LiveattheMirage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]