User talk:Stashtrump

Your Recent Contributions

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, But your recent edits have been undone because they did not appear to be constructive.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
For help, take a look at the introduction.

If you think i made a mistake or if you have any questions you can leave a message on my talk page, Thank You. Mr Eat (talk) 23:27, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Westmoreland Parish. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 00:41, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Westmoreland Parish, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 01:41, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Westmoreland Parish. BilCat (talk) 02:15, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Westmoreland Parish shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BilCat (talk) 02:16, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

dont change content without providing relaible sources

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of tallest buildings in India. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.Joy goel (talk)

February 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sounthirajan Kumaraswamy have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sounthirajan Kumaraswamy was changed by Stashtrump (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9185 on 2022-02-11T00:17:46+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:17, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Poledlimps per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Poledlimps. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 08:55, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]