User talk:Starczamora

This user may have left Wikipedia. Starczamora has not edited Wikipedia since 21 October 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives

Philippine supermodel search

This thing looks familiar but I can't place it. Maybe you could take a look?--Lenticel ^(talk) 23:56, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Starczamora (talk) 08:07, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Angel locsin.jpg

Dear Starczamora, I assure you that the photo was not taken fro this website which you think. I personally take this photo during the pictorial of F&H in a couple of weeks, maybe you are talking other version of this image. Cutie guyx22 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 08:37, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's already removed because proof was insufficient. Starczamora (talk) 13:43, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And any more blatant copyright violations will result in the image page being protected from recreation. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:17, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: I guess this is what our *good ol' friend* *took personally*: http://www.foldedandhung.com/img/content/collection/women/large/10.jpg - it belongs to Folded & Hung, not him, and he has NO right to claim that he owned the photo or took it. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Userpage

According to my userpage, it was vandalized by Blakegripling ph! He is suspecting me as a sockpuppet of User:Gerald Gonzalez even though im not. I Already requested my userpage to be Protected, i hope it will works.Cutie guyx22 (talk) 02:18, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you are a new user, you would not have an idea what WP:SOCK means. Your contributions, not just the Angel Locsin image that has been repeatedly uploaded by previous violators, are suspect. Starczamora (talk) 03:25, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to the fact that Cutie's editing style is similar to Gerald's... Blake Gripling (talk) 07:57, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Telebisyon.net

Hi, you have mentioned that Telebisyon.net is a spam site. Should we remove all links in Wikipedia that has Telebisyon.net? 119.95.139.227 (talk) 20:05, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, since all articles in Telebisyon.net are plagiarized from newspaper articles. Starczamora (talk) 01:39, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did You Know question

Hi. I've reviewed your DYK submission for the article Aliwan Fiesta, and made a comment on it at the submissions page. Please feel free to reply or comment there. Cheers, Art LaPella (talk) 04:11, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aliwan Fiesta DYK

On 1 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aliwan Fiesta, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 21:37, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Gerald's ban status...

Does this qualify for Gerald Gonzalez's formal revocation from editing Wikipedia?

Attempts to coerce actions of users through threats of actions outside the Wikipedia processes, whether onsite or offsite, are grounds for immediate banning.

He did that to me and other users, including Spellcast and Urumpe, where he used derogatory words and flaming against the two. Any thoughts on this? Blake Gripling (talk) 01:08, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It can be a ground for revocation, but remember that Wikipedia does not ban users for the sake of banning but rather "to protect Wikipedia". Perhaps you can relay your message to one of our Pinoy admins like Lenticel for a second opinion. Thanks! Starczamora (talk) 01:33, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Blake Gripling (talk) 01:47, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Anorexia billboard.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Anorexia billboard.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Anorexia billboard.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Anorexia billboard.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 18:22, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK: Taken by Cars

On 11 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Taken by Cars, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--PFHLai (talk) 00:10, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pinoy

Hi, I've rewritten Pinoy and would appreciate you revisiting Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinoy to see if your concerns have been addressed. Banjeboi 02:40, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edits on Marian Rivera

Well if thats the problem, i will put her igma.tv profile as her website and 2 images inside the article. Okay pls stop reverting my contributions. I Repsect you, so pls respect my edits. Your not only the wikipedian here Loverboyz (talk) 01:23, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

filmography is NOT LIKE A RESUME; we begin with the FIRST PROJECT not the most recent-----

What do you mean by this, huhu Look at the majot articles in wiki. does their First Project seen at the top? You are weird. Loverboyz (talk) 01:36, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Refer to Hollywood actors like Reese Witherspoon and see how its fimography is arranged. Also, please refer to WP:CIVIL. Your language is not fit for a Wikipedian. If you do not want your edits to be editted, DO NOT CONTRIBUTE. Simple as that. By the way, you have incorporated an image of Rivera that is subject to copyright violations. I will remove it. Starczamora (talk) 13:51, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Angel Locsin

Please do not remove references as what you did to Angel Locsin.Flicrz (talk) 05:11, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Enough of that. Blake Gripling (talk) 06:20, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I respect long time wikipedians like you. But please, just do good things in articles in wikipedia. Do not remove references like what you did to Angel Locsin. Flicrz (talk) 06:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do not throw baseless accusations. I can show the edit history of Angel Locsin and prove that you actually sneak speculative information within sourced statements. Starczamora (talk) 14:52, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Edits

Please do not revert my edits on Angel Locsin. WRCurtis (talk) 01:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also pls do not vandalize Angel Locsin. WRCurtis (talk) 01:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We're not vandalizing it, we're just doing our job. If you don't want your edits to be reverted or revised by others, then DON'T CONTRIBUTE. It's that simple. Blake Gripling (talk) 04:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Habbush Letter

I have already sent my opinion about the Habbush Letter. If it wasn't for vandalisms it would have pass.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Habbush_letter/1 Happy Editing! 14:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

It seems that the review page you sent was a typo. Anyway, I have made a better version here.

And sorry if the article sounds disturbing coz it was you in the first place. You said I was editing under bad faith...well that is an insult.Happy Editing! (talk) 11:35, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Projectrunwayaustralialogo.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Projectrunwayaustralialogo.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SEO⁷⁵ ^[talk] 08:28, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Geronimo

IPs again, and some newbies. --Efe (talk) 11:41, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on Survivor: Philippines

I'm but I have to revert your edit. "The game" is the section title for covering daily summaries and challenges and it is already a standard in many Survivor articles. Just for assimilation purposes, "The game" is the official title of the article. Just a heads up. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 07:33, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your lira luis post

hi starczamora. your last post conveyed my sentiments exactly. take care.--Eaglestorm (talk) 08:47, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy Section

Hi, I thought you might be interested in the issue of controversy section to all Filipino actors' and actresses' articles. The said discussion is to have coherence on all the said articles whether they should have a controversy section or the information be merged into other sections of the articles to achieve a more neutral presentation. If you are interested kindly visit User talk:Shoowak. Thanks! Axxand (talk) 05:24, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Geronimo

Hmm, so you reverted the article for me. Geniusdream warned me, suspecting me of section blanking, while his edits are COI and unnecessary. Any thoughts on this? God Bless and have a nice day... Blake Gripling (talk) 02:56, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

from --Geniusdream (talk) 07:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

The introduction was made that way since the succeeding contents is long enough to be summarized the version it is before your edits. Moreover, you need to read the contents of the introduction before you remove it all, because it a generalized version rather than the very detailed parts of the article next to the introduction. Regarding the commercial endorsements, it is part of being a celebrity, and it is just some of the most notable, so that readers will easily recall her or recognize her. --Geniusdream (talk) 07:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We reverted it because it's too long. The rest of the article, although long, is sufficient enough, and the lead intro should be kept as is. Any more and you might be blocked again for edit warring. Blake Gripling (talk) 08:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also please provide more valuable sources before editing it, coz it really seems like it is a blog, but this is wikipedia for encyclopedias. The article has no more credibility! Wynchard Bloom (talk) 09:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Wilyonaryo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wilyonaryo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 07:00, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Starczamora

Sorry about everything ive done with you and thank you for your contribution on Angel Locsin's talkpage because i really nominated it for a good article, will you help me on it, anyway are you admin here? sorry about before, i dont really know you, hehehe! Wynchard Bloom (talk) 02:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering, what's your prime reason for suspecting Wynchard of being a sock? Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 03:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know anything with this user, I and Bluemask were having a conversation about this image then I was shocked because he joined in our conversation while suspecting me those being a sock puppet, I told him that Im not aware of that, then he still putting sock tag on my userpage, I keep on reverting his edits but he still revert my edits also. I request you Admin to blocked this user. Thanks. Wynchard Bloom (talk) 04:18, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just like puppet master Gerard Gonzales, Wynchard Bloom claimed that he/ she is a cousin of Angel Locsin. The puppet, just like his master, also uploads copyvio images in Commons, claiming it as either "self-made" or under public domain. You can check out the puppet master's long line of socks and check out the pattern. Starczamora (talk) 05:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me Starczamora I already said that to you do many times that i dont know anything on your suspections. I Admit, I am really a cousin of Angel Locsin, as a cousin I really upload images with her and of course I put it that Im its original uploader/photograher because it was really me and I have a thousands of Pictures of Ms.Locsin even in her GMA Network photos. You're really wrong Starczamora with your suspection with me. You will not succeed because I'm not what you think and please stop vandalizing my talkpage if you dont want your talkpage to be vandalize also. Wynchard Bloom (talk) 05:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me having problem with wiki

Idk, i am paranoid. When I am logged out, Wiki seems to be working good. But the moment I log in, there seems to be a problem with the pages I am visiting. Something to do with the skin, but no, I am in no doubt it has nothing to do with the skin. When I edit pages, there seems to have a problem too, my tools in editing is missing. Do you have the same problem as I do? I tried logging in at our office, it is the same, the page appear to be not organized. I tried logging in at my house, it is still the same. Do you have the same problem as I do or am I the only one? Have a nice day! Axxand (talk) 06:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had fixed the problem. Sorry for the bother! Axxand (talk) 08:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its just fine Axxand. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Your so humorous.Wynchard Bloom (talk) 03:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Starczamora is a sock

You know Starczamora, you really ahve a mind problem! Its severe so please I'm advicing you to go to hospital either Mental hospital which fits you more. Because what on your mind is all sock, you better sock your face so that you'll be sock fovever. And if possible just sock sock yourself so that you'll be bring to the cementery and you can stay their forever. You're a sock person. Just sock and sock and sock yourself because you are sock also please wear sock because you foot looks like a sock. Your desturbing my day everyday, One more I will report you again to any admin here. You deserve to be blocked. What if you're a boyfriend of the sock your talking to, well if you miss her please dont include my name, because i dont want you to be my boyfriend. Your such a poor man having a poor mind because all of your minds is sock. Wynchard Bloom (talk) 06:35, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL at the jologs. Starczamora (talk) 06:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, maybe your doing these things because you like me, you have a crush on me or you want to kiss me or sock me. Nek nek mo. Wynchard Bloom (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're assuming too much. Starczamora (talk) 06:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious ba?! Hehehe. Wynchard Bloom (talk) 06:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Go back to PEX where you belong. Your immaturity obviously does not make you fit for a Wikipedian. Starczamora (talk) 06:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think so, I'm obvioulsy more deserving as a wikipedia than you, still i prevent vandalisms in phil. related pages. but u? what ur doing doing is just that putting socks tags on ur chosen wiki user as ur target which is a habit of an illeterate animal being what i mean is human being.LOL Wynchard Bloom (talk) 07:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you stop

Can you please stop this. Im tired. Sorry but Starczamora how many times i told you that I'm a sock puppet of that user. Even how many admins you tell about this, still they will not believe on you because im not what you think. - Wynchard Bloom ^{contact me}_{My work} 10:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Starczamora. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic User:Starczamora. Thank you.--Tikiwont (talk) 10:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Starczamora is Immature old man

Excuse me but Its really just normal to improved many articles including Filipino related articles including actors, film, tv series ect. About Angel Locsin, well she's famous and many loves her, well theres no doubt that many wikipedians are interested to make her article good, but only you is against her, well i dont care. If my works are the same or related to your boyfriend, i mean to a sock you suspect that its me, well i dont really dont know about that. It just only happened because i'm a celebrity fanatic who wants to edit showbiz related articles. And dont tell to everybody that my uploaded images were copybio because its really my own work and you have no right to say it because you have no proff. Excuse me Starczamora but i never harassed you? huh! And I'm not that wikipedian to harrased to a fanboy and a desperate wikipedian who hate my cousin, Angel Locsin too much. I've mensioned that Im a cousin of Locsin which is true and why are you complaining, are you only just insecure or envious with me? I also put sock tag on your userpage because you deserve it, you almost put sock tags 7 times on my userpage. Because you're blaming me as a sock which is not true. And last I'm not totally immature, im just immature to the animal i mean person who's most immature wikipedian. Ive ever known. Wynchard Bloom ^{contact me}_{My work} 01:51, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Rfa

Starczamora, thank you very much for participating in my Rfa, which was successful with 80 Support, 5 Oppose, 6 Neutral. The comments were overwhelming, and hopefully I can live up to the expectation of the community.

I would also like to thank my nominator Realist² and my co-nom Orane (talk), and special mention to Acalamari and Lenticel ^(talk) for the kindness from the start. Regards, Efe

--Efe (talk) 05:41, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You!!!

I have been falsely accused and reported by Wynchard in the past week and have been blocked for so long. Thank you for revealing all those about wynchard which has this resulted in a block. If you look at my talk page, You would see a whole heap of writing in regards to so many issues that Wynchard all started. I was isolated to one page and have been a sitting duck for people like wynchard, where he consistently supplied the administrators of his corrupt claims and incorrect assumptions. Now you have finally debunked him and I Thank you greatly for that. On my page, you'll see how much he contradicts everything that he has been preaching to everyone. It'll be great if you can check out my page just to see what Wynchard has been up to before he was blocked (if you haven't already). It really is quite funny. Thanks. Have a Nice Day especially with Wynchard out of the topic! :) Slemcal (talk) 01:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment tagging

Hi. Please do not tag all of the articles in the worklist. As I always repeatedly say, not all articles in the worklist deserve the Tambay project banner, otherwise, I'd have done the job via a bot myself. For example, you tagged Alenia Aermacchi M-311, but a cursory look at the article shows that it's not related to the Philippines (and your edit there was promptly reverted). The worklists I created are generated via categories, but the categories may be incorrect. That's why the tagging requires human intervention. Also, please try to add the class and importance parameters. --seav (talk) 05:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that minor lapse, but if you may have observed I skipped tagging a few articles. Starczamora (talk) 14:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for highlighting your lapse. The talk message above should've been sufficient. Anyway, I've removed the note from the worklist; I shouldn't have put it there in the first place. --seav (talk) 18:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Philippines'_Next_Top_Model#Merge_from_Philippines.27_Next_Top_Model.2C_Cycle_1

Hi Star, I was cleaning the tambayan main page when I saw that this merger has enough connsensus for a merge. I think it's time for you to merge/redirect the article.--Lenticel ^(talk) 02:42, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Starczamora (talk) 09:32, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Labers

As somebody familiar with Philippine TV (and interested editors), may I ask you to help User:Labers settle in? Thanks in advance, --Tikiwont (talk) 13:19, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

;]

Thank you for notifying me about it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Labers (talk • contribs) 13:52, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures on User: pages

I noticed you removed a free-image picture from a User page, with the edit summary "rmv jenniylyn photo; it is not the image of the user."

I know most of Wikipedia's rules but I don't recall reading that one. I agree, such practice should be discouraged, especially when it's deceptive, but I don't see it in any of the rules. If it is a rule, please cure my ignorance. If it's not, consider undoing your edit and whipping the user on his user talk page with the wet noodle he deserves.

Also, if it's not a rule that you can't have these pictures on your user page, consider writing a "user essay" describing what you think is and is not good practice for user-page content. If it catches on and people cite it when talking to users with problematic user-page content, it can be moved to a regular, Wikipedia essay later. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 14:23, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's common sense, really. It is not the photo of the user, that is Jennylyn Mercado. Thanks. Starczamora (talk) 05:52, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hello

so what if it isn't my image? who da [toooot (let's sensor that)] u think u r?

rajalberini talk —Preceding undated comment was added at 06:47, 2 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Careful with your words now. You're violating WP:CIVIL. Starczamora (talk) 15:09, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that but u vandalized my page!!! I want justice... I was formerly user:rajalberini --EmilinAlbs (talk) 03:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC) --EmilinAlbs (talk) 03:11, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

!

PLEASE BE REMINDED THAT SOME INFORMATIONS ADDED ON THE WIKIPEDIA SITE WAS BASED ON TRUE OR FACT INFORMATIONS THAT WAS REALLY HAPPENED. IF SUCH "PHENOMENAL STAR" IS INCLUDED ON THE ARTICLE, IT IS FOR THE PURPOSE THAT AN AWARD GIVING BODY HAPPENS TO NAME AND AWARD THE ARTIST AS SUCH LABEL. THANK YOU —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalabs (talk • contribs) 11:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. I know what you feel, but please be reminded that we Wikipedians observe a strict policy regarding neutral point of view. We're not here to make fan pages or tributes to celebrities like Marian Rivera, this is an encyclopedia and we users are expected to see and/or add factual information, not cheer or add personal commentary about the actress. If that's your intention, please consider starting a fan site instead of disrupting us editors, OK? Blake Gripling (talk) 13:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Mau Marcelo Music Video.JPG

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Mau Marcelo Music Video.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 20:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback Tool

Hi Star, I just applied awhile back for a Rollback Tool and was granted a minute or two. I think it would be a big help for you in reverting vandals mostly in Philippine celebrity articles. It simplify things a lot! Have a blessed holy week. axrealmdotcom (talk) 14:29, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Jan Nieto Philippine Idol Performance.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Jan Nieto Philippine Idol Performance.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:27, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Jan Nieto On Sis.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Jan Nieto On Sis.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:27, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Takebycars01.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Takebycars01.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:28, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:RoyalTru1976.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:RoyalTru1976.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:30, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:MonaLisa.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:MonaLisa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:31, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Anchoredangelcover.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Anchoredangelcover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Mau Marcelo Idol Performance.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Mau Marcelo Idol Performance.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:34, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Starczamora

I just gave you rollback. Please have a look over WP:ROLLBACK before using it, but the main thing to remember is that it's only to be used for really obvious vandalism and not in content disputes and such. I hope you find it handy when dealing with Gerald Gonzalez and his family of socks! Cheers, Sarah 05:36, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Takebycars01.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Takebycars01.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:40, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubos Na Ang Luha Ko / Ubos Na Ang Luha Ko

Are you an administrator? If you are, can you do me a favor? Can you please delete the article Ubos Na Ang Luha Ko because it is false and has no sources. Please Delete the article as soon as possible. The article's deletion case can be found here at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubos Na Ang Luha Ko Thank You. GMA Fan 4:04PM July 23, 2009 (UTC)

No, I am not an administrator. Deletion takes time, and as you can see, it is already deleted. Please be patient next time. Remember that this is a community and NOBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO TELL PEOPLE ORDERS. Thank you. Starczamora (talk) 08:20, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Project Runway Philippines (season 2)

On August 22, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Project Runway Philippines (season 2), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 05:00, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:MonaLisa.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:MonaLisa.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 03:53, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anorexia billboard.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anorexia billboard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:07, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pasalog.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pasalog.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:41, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Jan Nieto Philippine Idol Campaign.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Jan Nieto Philippine Idol Campaign.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 22:35, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Jan Nieto Philippine Idol Performance.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Jan Nieto Philippine Idol Performance.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 22:35, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Jan Nieto On Sis.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Jan Nieto On Sis.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 22:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mau Marcelo Campaign.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Mau Marcelo Campaign.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 22:45, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mau Marcelo Idol Performance.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Mau Marcelo Idol Performance.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 22:45, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mau Marcelo Lucena Concert Poster.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Mau Marcelo Lucena Concert Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 22:45, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Anchoredangelcover.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Anchoredangelcover.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 22:49, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:17 28 album cover.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:17 28 album cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:45, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Gian Magdangal Idol Campaign.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Gian Magdangal Idol Campaign.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:47, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Noynoying

Good to see you're working on making NoyNoying adhere to NPOV. Lotsa work to be done, and I can only offer limited help, so I'm going to express my appreciation here now and see if I can help out further. :D Whew, you sure get into a lot of controversies, don't you? :D - Alternativity (talk) 06:51, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! I really do not plan on editing the article, but I could not help it. Starczamora (talk) 06:58, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for finding the time to go through my contribution to the term "Noynoying." I used to actively edit for Wikipedia, but for some reasons, I am unable to log-in to my old account. And I'm still struggling with this Wikipedia mark-up.

That aside, I think we should reconsider putting back in the definition portion Mar's alternate definition of Noynoying, for the simple reason that it is an offered definition. It is not a usual reaction from sectors, who merely proposes sentiments and feeling about the word. I know we have been talking about NPOV, but in reality, we cannot be neutral not objective. Journ ethics professors would attest to this. But what we can be is to be fair. And fairness, especially if a name of a leader of a country is involved demands that we put a space, no matter how small, for alternate meanings to something that is, as wikipedia terms it, a "protest gimmick." Fair space in correct space is how we can start to be neutral. totenggaleng (talk) 08:59, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Although the article struggles to keep it as neutral as possible, there are several issues in putting the Mar Roxas definition of Noynoying:

1) That before Mar Roxas shared his definitions, other columnists also wrote their own "definitions" of Noynoying apart from what was introduced during the protests, both favorable and unfavorable of President Aquino. All of them are already included in the Reception section, but since you want to add Mar Roxas' alternate definition in the lead, should we might as well as theirs as well?

2) Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so I believe we cannot add the "alternate" definition simply because it is offered more recently.

It would be much better to add your responses to the talk section of Noynoying so other editors will contribute to the discussion. Thank you. Starczamora (talk) 02:35, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:President Aquino at work.jpg

Hi, Star. I moved the photo you uploaded to Commons since Commons now accepts works of the Philippine government freely. Please upload future government works to Commons. Thanks. :) --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 10:44, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Starczamora. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noynoying.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Philippine WikiCon

You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed blackout in protest of RA 10175

Dear Starczamora,

Greetings!

As a Filipino Wikipedian, I hope you are aware of the passage of Republic Act No. 10175, also known as the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, which was signed into law by President Benigno Aquino III on September 12, 2012. Currently, there is a discussion on the Tambayan, the noticeboard for Philippines-related topics, about a proposed blackout of the English Wikipedia in the Philippines in order to protest the passage of RA 10175, similar to the blackout against SOPA and PIPA held earlier this year. I feel that your input on the subject will definitely help in the discussion.

Please feel free to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines#The Cybercrime Prevention Act, and I hope your input will help the Filipino Wikipedia community determine which is the best course of action against this law. Similarly, we hope to get as much input from as many Wikipedians as possible.

Thank you and maraming salamat po!

Kind regards,

Sky Harbor ^(talk) 07:10, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Jan Nieto Philippine Idol.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jan Nieto Philippine Idol.jpg, which you've sourced to http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgarj/323063640/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 08:46, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:RoyalTruOrange.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RoyalTruOrange.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:52, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paulino Alcantara.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Paulino Alcantara.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:28, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Guccigangscreenshot01a.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Guccigangscreenshot01a.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DEX New York (October 19)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DEX New York.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! TKK! bark with me if you're my dog! 18:42, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DEX New York (November 27)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DEX New York.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson (talk!) 03:18, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DEX New York (November 27)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DEX New York.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! TKK! bark with me if you're my dog! 06:45, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC DEX New York was accepted

DEX New York, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TKK! bark with me if you're my dog! 18:56, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Filipino journalists protest against Noynoying of government officials over media killings, April 2014.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Filipino journalists protest against Noynoying of government officials over media killings, April 2014.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 15:37, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Make Me a Supermodel (Australian TV series).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Make Me a Supermodel (Australian TV series).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — trlkly 11:37, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ProjectCatwalkNetherlandsLogo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ProjectCatwalkNetherlandsLogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:23, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ProjectCatwalkNetherlandsLogo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ProjectCatwalkNetherlandsLogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:50, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ph seal abra.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ph seal abra.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Train to Busan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Class warfare. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Starczamora. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Starczamora. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Starczamora. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PaperDollScreenshot.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PaperDollScreenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:36, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paperdollscreenshot02.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paperdollscreenshot02.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:37, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pinoy Idol logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pinoy Idol logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 US Banknote Contest

US Banknote Contest

November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.

If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

Nomination of Philippine Idol finalists for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philippine Idol finalists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippine Idol finalists until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 01:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Philippine Idol semifinalists for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philippine Idol semifinalists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippine Idol finalists until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 01:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yova Alonzo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yova Alonzo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]