User talk:Lenin and McCarthy

Previous talk:

Massino Maspeth

Found this on the left side PLACE OF BIRTH: Maspeth, New York. It also has "Massino married Josephine Vitale in 1960, the couple had two daughters, Adeline and Joanne.

In "The Last Godfather: The Rise And Fall of Joey Massino By Simon Crittle" pg. 50 it has Josephine Vitale was born in Sicily, her brother Sal was born in America they lived in Bushwick, Brooklyn. Again he married Josephine in 1960 but had three daughters, they lived in Maspeth on Caldwell Avenue. --Vic49 (talk) 22:27, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KoG DeStefano has "three daughters": Adeline and Joanne (she's the youngest); he does not say the last daughters name, daily mail has it Linda (?). Last Godfather by Crittle has three. But in five families by Raab pg.682 he only has two daughters at the case. Unless the last one didnt show up if or there is no third daughter? But I think the name Linda was confused with his mistress Linda Lucci she is mentioned in both KOG and LG. --Vic49 (talk) 23:19, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Abuse Response Filing

Greetings! Thank you for filing an Abuse Report for abusive behavior originating from 77.125.91.129. We wanted to let you know that the case has been opened and is currently under investigation. Even though the user doesn't have 5 blocks on this IP, there are some serious allegations that need to be looked at. AndrewN ^talk 05:42, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, sorry for the delay on getting to this. Not very many people are active on the project. If you have any further information, please add it to the case talk page. AndrewN ^talk 06:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Silent Hill: Shattered Memories

After an expansion, copy-edit, and clean-up by Kaguya-chan and, to a lesser extent, by me, I'd like to ask you to examine if the article fulfills the B-class criteria and if it does so, to promote it. If it doesn't, advice and/or comments on what it needs to be promoted would be greatly appreciated. I'm asking a third party to do it because me and KC might have been a little bit subjective in the assessment, since we were the main contributors. I'll understand if you don't have time or aren't in the mood. Thank you. Hula Hup (talk) 13:23, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Lenin and McCarthy. You have new messages at AndrewN's talk page.
Message added 01:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

AndrewN ^talk 01:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Luciano Article

Have been doing a lot of work on the Lucky Luciano article and would appreciate your feedback (and changes) on it if you have time. Thanks. Rogermx (talk) 21:00, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joseph Lubrano for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Lubrano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Lubrano until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. :I known you did not create the article but you may be interested. --Vic49 (talk) 21:59, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Castellucci for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Castellucci is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Castellucci until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. :I known you did not create the article but you may be interested. --Vic49 (talk) 21:59, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congrets Massino

Congrets on the Massino article. --Vic49 (talk) 16:40, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review is a good idea. After the peer review are you going for Featured article? --Vic49 (talk) 21:29, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re-chart

Its a good idea to upload the image. --Vic49 (talk) 01:09, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I see that I put "Robert Gay" in a Reference title. I wanted to shorten it. Actually, My referencing isnt Poor, I havent even saw 1 person have more than 5 Reference's for a "Gangster". It is was really hard to find Reference's under Robert Mormando, I tried to post more thing's about him and the most Important thing about him was that he is Gay and it is very Unusual to find a "Gangster" that is gay and is usually killed for breaking Omerta also he dated John Gotti's nephew which I also find quite Important. I havent seen any person on Wikipedia Referencing and having as much Information on a Gangster apart from me. Im actually considered The "Wikipedia Five Familie's Leader", Haha. Have a great week.

King Luciano (talk) 16:32, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I believe you are right about those being pics of the same time. Well done on the article. It is in great shape. You post on gangsterbb, yes? --Ted87 (talk) 06:07, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lenin and McCarthy

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1017:B41C:D2FE:A804:B232:B485:7D23 (talk) 01:05, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, what do you mean by KG and Socks? Big Paul99 (talk) 03:51, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OH! I understand, Do you wish for me to take the picture's down, I don't see a catastrophe in it, Facebook people use them all the time and I never see someone on a Website like Five Families complain about it, and take them to court over a Photo about a Criminal who shouldn't even have a Photo! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Big Paul99 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Massino news

Massino in court again Ex-Bonanno crime boss Joseph Massino, in prison for murder, set to sing again in extortion trial New York Daily News (November 14, 2012) --Vic49 (talk) 23:34, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks feel free to add to the list. --Vic49 (talk) 01:03, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Orange County Register, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drug use (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lubrano

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Lubrano (2nd nomination) --Vic49 (talk) 00:00, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas5}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Altered speedy deletion rationale: David Catapano

Hello Lenin and McCarthy. I am just letting you know that I deleted David Catapano, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 00:01, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Galante pic

I found this image of Carmine Galante here. The picture is a New York Daily News front cover (I don't known if it can be uploaded but found this as an example here. Thanks --Vic49 (talk) 20:54, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hess GA

Hi! Thanks for your comments on the review, but could you explain what you mean? I looked through the article and couldn't find what you were reffering to. Thanks! ★★Retro Lord ★★ 23:58, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gambino new boss/Mancuso pic

I couldn't find any references to prove Cali is the new boss.

Mancuso pics
Michael Mancuso and FBI pic
Michael Mancuso 2 another FBI pic.

I found these pics of Mancuso can you upload them. Thanks --Vic49 (talk) 00:06, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mafia term

The term Mafia is not the official name for organized crime it's a media term. I think it would be a good idea to drop the "American" part off and just use Mafia, linking it to the American Mafia article. So the lead of the article would be He is a member of the Mafia (Cosa Nostra) it would be good not to link the "Cosa Nostra" to the Sicilian Mafia article since they are different organizations. The Mafia in American uses the term Cosa Nostra to describe itself. --Vic49 (talk) 21:30, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it could be He was a member of the Mafia (Cosa Nostra, in English "Our Thing") it maybe a good idea to link "Our Thing" to the Etymology section of the Sicilian Mafia article.--Vic49 (talk) 21:54, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree Mafia (Cosa Nostra) has a simple look and the reader flows through the sentence easily. The Sicilian Mafia article explains that in America the government official uses the term "La Cosa Nostra" to describe the Mafia. I think Cosa Nostra would be just fine since its the governments usage and no member refers to it as "La Cosa Nostra" its just "Cosa Nostra" to them. Which is bettter? --Vic49 (talk) 22:15, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Luciano pic

I found these pics of Luciano in the Library of congress which makes them free to use.

"Lucky" Luciano being escorted into court by two detectives enlarged here

Can you upload the image. Thanks --Vic49 (talk) 22:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sal Vitale

I've been meaning to take that article apart for awhile... just haven't gotten around to it. Thank God I've got Five Families on my Nook ... HangingCurve^{Swing for the fence} 21:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vitale

I dont know couldnt find any dates, but I did find this:
In Five Families (Mafia groupies; pg. 653 Vitale seperated from Diana in 1998

In Jerry Capeci's Gang Land pg. 318 Vitale and Diana had sons dont know how many or names. --Vic49 (talk) 23:21, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Lenin and McCarthy. You have new messages at Talk:Colorado recall election of 2013.
Message added 01:57, 14 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GregJackP Boomer! 01:57, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced the ref with one to the Denver Post editorial on the matter. GregJackP Boomer! 23:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: CrytpoLocker mitigated? Not quite...

That was CryptoDefence, a shoddy knockoff version of CryptoLocker. I actually moved that and CryptoLocker 2.0 into a new "Clones" section. ViperSnake151 Talk 04:33, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I can't read. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 05:15, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saints Row 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Voodoo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Saints Row 2 Plot

Thanks for taking out the superfluousness of Saints Row 2's Plot section! If you're interested, we're currently looking at getting it up to GA standard so any further copy-edit would be welcomed. Cheers! CR4ZE (t • c) 17:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Rt. Hon. Tub of Lard MP listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Rt. Hon. Tub of Lard MP. Since you had some involvement with the The Rt. Hon. Tub of Lard MP redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Laun chba ller 14:12, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eric the Actor

Hey, would you mind making your move request at Eric the Actor into a formalized one using the method from WP:RM? That way, once the discussion is closed, it can be moved by an admin, since the move is not currently one that can be done by a regular editor. Or alternatively you could request it as a non controversial move, depending on how you feel about that.--Yaksar (let's chat) 06:19, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, so sorry about rushing to the move, I was going to make it just a technical request but rethought it and made a normal official request instead, completely forgetting to give you any time in case you wanted to be the one to make the nomination. My bad.--Yaksar (let's chat) 17:16, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from the team at Featured article review!

We are preparing to take a closer look at Featured articles promoted in 2004–2010 that may need a review. We started with a script-compiled list of older FAs that have not had a recent formal review. The next step is to prune the list by removing articles that are still actively maintained, up-to-date, and believed to meet current standards. We know that many of you personally maintain articles that you nominated, so we'd appreciate your help in winnowing the list where appropriate.

Please take a look at the sandbox list, check over the FAs listed by your name, and indicate on the sandbox talk page your assessment of their current status. Likewise, if you have taken on the maintenance of any listed FAs that were originally nominated by a departed editor, please indicate their status. BLPs should be given especially careful consideration.

Thanks for your help! Maralia (talk) 19:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kukulaka listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kukulaka. Since you had some involvement with the Kukulaka redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 04:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 17, 2016

You nominated this one many years ago. I have to condense the lead for the TFA text; let me know how it looks. - Dank (push to talk) 00:52, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

silent drums

Thank you for quality contributions to articles such as Silent Hill 4, Borat and Joseph Massino, for splitting hairs when necessary, for patient corrections, - drummer: you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:23, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Four years ago, you were recipient no. 1412 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:09, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fahrenheit 451 (2009 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fahrenheit 451 (2009 film). Since you had some involvement with the Fahrenheit 451 (2009 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Jason Quinn (talk) 13:56, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lenin and McCarthy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fahrenheit 451 (unreleased film)

Hello, Lenin and McCarthy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fahrenheit 451".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 06:46, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lenin and McCarthy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lenin and McCarthy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your account-name

Hello, ِYour account-name is not permitted according to name-policy at ArWikipedia. It has been nominated for "Block", but Don't worry, I add your account to a category of "Active accounts on other wikis", so It will not be blocked for a while to give you the chance to ask for changing it. Could you please change it and tell me to stop blocking-process. Thanks. --Dr-Taher (talk) 08:01, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

World replacer

By crow, my word replacer WAS changing the refs! It's never done that before, and I thought you were just being snarky! Sorry for the snipping and the misunderstanding! Got2Hands (talk) 22:33, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SH3 hiya.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SH3 hiya.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Following up

Just so that you're aware, I ran this to ground out to make sure that concern was looked into. Turned out I was wrong, but I figured you might want to know too. Regards, AzureCitizen (talk) 21:32, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Million Award for John Gotti

	The Million Award
	For your contributions to bring John Gotti (estimated annual readership: 2,100,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 14:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Borat

@Lenin and McCarthy: Greetings! I saw that you got Borat to featured article status back in 2007, very nice!. Could you please take a look at it and see if it is lacking anything? It's been a long while since it was promoted. Cheers. Wretchskull (talk) 13:06, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"John Reynolds (Actor)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect John Reynolds (Actor). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 15#John Reynolds (Actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. OcelotCreeper2 (talk) 19:58, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Borat is at FAR

Greetings! I want to notify you that Borat is at FAR. This message is being forwarded to the biggest active contributors who were originally pinged back in February. Wretchskull (talk) 10:47, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:53, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]