User talk:Geniusdream

This is the discussion page of Genius Dream, feel free to put comments or messages regarding me as a user here in Wikipedia, so that I can work on it as soon as possible. --Geniusdream (talk) 14:30, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Efe (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Geniusdream (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You can delete immediately all of the images that have no references, because I really don't know how to delete and provide references for it.

Decline reason:

I'm not convinced by the exchange below that you're aware what you've done is wrong. Your block is temporary - it expires on Sunday - so I suggest taking this time to familiarise yourself with the policies about image uploads. — Fritzpoll (talk) 18:30, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Have you read and understood Wikipedia:Image use policy, particularly with regards to fair use considerations? Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Not yet, I'm just a new user, and I really can't grasp everything about it, so I just upload pictures just like with other sites. You can delete those images immediately, then I'll be reading Wikipedia:Image use policy and upload pictures properly next time. --Geniusdream (talk) 07:51, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well that really didn't make sense for me at all. It means that an admin will just unblock you, when you don't know the reason & will possibly continue to upload copyright violations? I really suggest you check WP:IUP & try again. --Kanonkas : Talk 14:28, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Geniusdream (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just reverting the article Sarah Geronimo to the version which has the references, compared to the version that other users keep on putting there, which has no references. Furthermore, the user Wynchard Bloom (talk) keeps on vandalizing my userpage as well as my discussion page, putting personal attacks on it and warnings that are indefinite.

Decline reason:

Whatver issue you have with Wychcard personally: You continued to push your changes into Sarah Geronimo after I advised you above not to do so and fake block notices[1] don't help your case either. — Tikiwont (talk) 12:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Geniusdream (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit it, I engaged myself to an edit war, but I just want to make the article better and more comprehensive. Look at the current version of Sarah Geronimo, the references was reduced compared to the version I reverted. And furthermore, regarding the long introduction, as I have read on one of the guidelines here in wikipedia, it is said that putting information is unlimited as long as it has sources and moreover, the introduction was generalized rather than very detailed.

Decline reason:

You still haven't said anything about the image copyright violation issue; also, even if you were editing with good intentions, you still breached 3RR. Also, as others have pointed out, some of your conduct is uncalled for (such as the fake blocks). — Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 14:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Geniusdream (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Regarding the images I've uploaded, I'm really not familiar about license or sources for the photos, I was trying to delete those but I can't. Then, the issue about 3RR, I admit that act but I really wanted to put it back to the version which has better references. And the fake blocks, the template I gave was supposed to be a warning, I've mistaken.

Decline reason:

Sorry, but you haven't given any reason to be unblocked. Also, your edits are strikingly similar to another blocked user's (whose name you share), which means you're evading blocks. So no can do. You're welcome to discuss this, but please do not post any more unblock notices or your talk page will be protected. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 16:55, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Suspected sockpuppet

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sock puppet of GENIUS(4th power).
Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Geniusdream (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How come you suspected me of being someone else, just because we have close username, I think if I'm that blocked user I will use another username that is far from the previous name and besides, my contributions are far from the edits of that user, and I'm concentrating myself to Sarah Geronimo.

Decline reason:

You weren't blocked for this suspicion, or it would have been indefinite. In the meantime, 3 unblock requests is enough for a 48-hour block and this one adds nothing new. Since you were already warned, I'm now protecting this page so you can't make any more requests until the block expires. Mango juice^talk 13:46, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Image tagging for Image:Sarah awards.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sarah awards.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:43, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Sarah Geronimo, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Blake Gripling (talk) 07:09, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. --VS ^talk 07:37, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]