User talk:Stanglavine

Scottie McClue

Hi Stanglavine, I noticed someone had vandalized The Scottie McClue page so that when you search up Scottie you get some other guy and I was just trying tp put it right if you can help great it needs to be if you search Scottie McClue you get Scottie McClue - appreciated — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.135.118.116 (talk) 23:08, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk-page left behind

Hi! You've renamed Md.altaf.rahman to Dead.rabbit, but you seem to have left his user talk-page at User talk:Md.altaf.rahman. Was that intentional? Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:59, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Justlettersandnumbers: thanks for warning! This was caused by a filter. We global renamers that are not global sysop or global rollback have problems with filters constantly. I try fix. To help, you can set to me extended-confirmed or another groups that me free of filters on this wiki? Tks! Stanglavine (talk) 11:38, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can move only some pages, but I can't move talk pages and .js or .css. You can fix? Stanglavine (talk) 11:45, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It looks as if Galobtter (who surely has a better understanding of user rights than I do) has changed your status here to confirmed. Please tell us if that isn't enough to allow you to do all that you need to. Will you move User talk:Md.altaf.rahman or do you want me to? Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:02, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)I gave you confirmed, which allows bypassing the move filter here. I've moved the talk pages; JS and CSS pages can only be moved by interface admins, so I've posted a note asking them to be moved at WP:IANB. Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Galobtter and Justlettersandnumbers: Thank you! Stanglavine (talk) 12:10, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rename concern

Hi Stanglavine. You recently renamed User:Burasari Group to User:Burasari2002. I'm concerned that this new username still appears to be a clear violation of WP:CORPNAME, since it clearly refers to the company as a whole, not to a specific individual. Without meaning to be a dick about it, can I ask you to explain the reasoning behind that change, please? Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:50, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yunshui! I am not an editor in your local project, but I understand that "2002" characters in username make it possible according WP: ISU (item 4). Corporation names are allowed if don't implicate shared use. I'm wrong? If yes, you can keep the block and explain this to user, that he need to request a new rename. If not, I see no problems with renamed to "Burasari2002". Regards, Stanglavine (talk) 14:59, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thing is, 2002 is a year (or a number), not a person. I mean, I guess I can see your argument, but the name of the company plus a number doesn't - to me at least - indicate that it denotes an individual rather than, say, a company founded in 2002. BurasariTimothy or BurasariJanet, no problem, but to be honest I would have blocked them if that had been their original username. Maybe one for discussion? Yunshui ^雲 _水 18:25, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yunshui: I agree that name of company + a number not tipify an account as individual, but it is writhe in WP:ISU. As global rename, I'm forced to adopt the policy. And, according policy, "Burasari2002" is possible. At least in my point of view. Regards, Stanglavine (talk) 20:39, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really not seeing that in the policy at WP:ISU. Tell you what, let's throw it up against the wall at WT:UN and see what others think. I'll go and start a thread there now. Yunshui ^雲 _水 21:19, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be consensus at Wikipedia_talk:Username_policy#Names_and_numbers that this new username is definitely not acceptable under the policy, so I have declined the user's unblock request. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for help

Jone Evlish Hi,

I was looking for some small help.Recently I created a new article en:Kithaab i.e. es:Kithaab-a play about women rights issues- which has been copy edited and is ready for translation in various languages.

Looking for your possible help in translating the article en:Kithaab es:Kithaab to your nl: language Wikipedia. If you are unable to spare time yourself then may be you like to refer the same to some other translator to get it translated in their own respective languages.

Thanking you , with warm regards

03:41, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Hello, I'm Everedux. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Technical lettering— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Everedux ^(talk) 01:24, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Everedux: It's correct? Because this seem like vandalism to me. Stanglavine (talk) 01:27, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I accidentally reverted the wrong edit. Sorry! Everedux ^(talk) 01:29, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) Stanglavine (talk) 01:32, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. From AnUnnamedUser ^{(open talk page)} 16:35, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hey, thanks for the rename. Cheers! Karan (Theintuitus) (talk) 12:43, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging of User talk:202.47.56.218

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on User talk:202.47.56.218. I do not think that User talk:202.47.56.218 fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because We don't normally speedy delete user talk pages for any reason at all; Deletion as a test page is explicitly out-of-scope in user space, where test pages are welcome. If you wish, you may try using the simple proposed deletion (PROD) process, or the full articles for deletion (AfD) process, instead. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 00:03, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Hi, I've noticed that on some articles the word "psychologist" is linked, while on others, it's not. When should we link the word and when should we not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.61.222.89 (talk) 20:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Generally, when the topic can be interesting for the reader, considering the article he is currently reading. But you don't need use <nowiki> tag, just insert [[page]]. See how insert and when insert. Regards, Rafael ^{(stanglavine) msg} 20:58, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Stanglavine. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Cabayi (talk) 16:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Rafael ^{(stanglavine) msg} 17:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Auréola

Caro Stanglavine, não posso editar nem enviar mensagens pela Wikipédia em português. Já que foi você quem abriu por lá esta nova discussão de bloqueio sobre mim, preciso enviar uma mensagem como direito de defesa aos administradores e a todos. Não é possível que sejam implacáveis uma vez mais por uma injustiça, por um comentário mediador meu ter sido vandalizado pelo Usuário:GhostP., suprimido gratuitamente em Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Discussão de bloqueio/Raimundo57br/22, e P. T. Ramos ter revertido o vandalismo. Por onde envio minha resposta/defesa? Nem mesmo posso editar em minha página de usuário. Já enviei e-mail para <unblock-pt-l@lists.wikimedia.org>, mas acredito que a lista seja negligenciada ou acaba atrasando. Envio para algum e-mail seu? Qual? Essa implacabilidade atual, intolerante, não pode tolher um editor antigo assim, de edições valiosas, acostumado com as discussões acaloradas da primeira geração wikipediana. Auréola (talk) 07:18, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Auréola: Olá, sua página de discussão já foi liberada na ptwiki, você já pode incluir sua defesa lá. Se quiser mandar por aqui também, não tem problema. stanglavine ^msg 13:59, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]