User talk:Sri Harsha Malempati

Welcome!

Hello, Sri Harsha Malempati, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as List of shows broadcast by maatv, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Domdeparis (talk) 15:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, List of shows broadcast by maatv

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of shows broadcast by maatv. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – MAA TV. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at MAA TV – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Domdeparis (talk) 15:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sri Harsha Malempati/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 15:46, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sri Harsha Malempati, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 15:46, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Nagin tv series in India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of Nagin tv series in India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jupitus Smart 03:52, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Nagin tv series in India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of Nagin tv series in India, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jupitus Smart 05:10, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Sri Harsha Malempati/sandbox

Hello, Sri Harsha Malempati. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Linguist^un Eins ^uno 08:01, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Monica Sharma image.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Monica Sharma image.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Malavika Wales image.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Malavika Wales image.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:30, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Nithya Ram image.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nithya Ram image.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use of non-free images

Hi,

I see you've uploaded some non-free images of living people to illustrate their Wikipedia article. The use of non-free images on Wikipedia must comply with all the non-free content criteria. In particular, images of living people almost always fail to meet "no free equivalent". It's not sufficient that you cannot find a free image. It must also be the case the a free image could not be created. For living people that is almost always possible. The non-free content guidelines explicitly state "Non-free content should not be used when a freely licensed file that serves the same purpose can reasonably be expected to be uploaded, as is the case for almost all portraits of living people" (emphasis added). If you cannot find a free image of a living person, please do not upload a non-free one. It's just going to be deleted. -- Whpq (talk) 19:47, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Malavika Wales.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Malavika Wales.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 08:46, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Nithya Ram.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nithya Ram.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:31, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Marina Abraham.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Marina Abraham.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 17:58, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Malavika Wales.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Malavika Wales.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 17:59, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please stop uploading copyright violations

Please stop uploading images that do not belong to you. Repeated copyright violations will result in your editing privileges being revoked. Anything you find online is considered to be copyrighted. Just because it is online does not mean it is licensed under a license we can use. If you have any questions please feel free to ask me but please stop uploading images. Majora (talk) 17:59, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Marina Abraham.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Marina Abraham.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 23:22, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Repeated upload of copyvio images. Majora (talk) 23:26, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once you have been unblocked, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You have repeatedly uploaded copyrighted images which have been deleted. This is contrary to policy and must stop. You can be unblocked by any administrator if you make a firm commitment to never upload a copyrighted image again. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 02:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize what I did so far, but not my intention to break terms and conditions, I upload images without knowing copyright policy after that I usually did it with alternative way as try and error method by believing if I did wrong you be their to correct it my big mistake, but last image I had upload is gotten by Facebook friend I PROMISE this never will happen again. So, please unblock me Today I know it still much more to learn about Wikipedia on how to edit I will learn as possible as I can Thank you Sri Harsha Malempati (talk) 16:41, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain in your own words what you interpret our copyright policy to say generally, including WP:NFCC. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:25, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot upload an image from a "Facebook friend" unless that image is explicitly available, in writing, under an acceptable free license. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 20:38, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it don't be repeat again so please unblock me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sri Harsha Malempati (talk • contribs) 02:11, June 3, 2018 (UTC)

Once again: Please explain in your own words what you interpret our copyright policy to say generally, including WP:NFCC. And please sign your posts with four tildes like ~~~~ Also, if you are requesting an unblock, you need to follow the directions in the box above. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:14, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sri Harsha Malempati (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know my mistake it don't be repeat again Sri Harsha Malempati (talk) 03:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One request at a time, please. Max Semenik (talk) 05:17, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sri Harsha Malempati (talk) 03:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sri Harsha Malempati (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know my mistake, I did it unaware of copyright policy now I understand ,it will not repeat againSri Harsha Malempati (talk) 03:50, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As explained by Cyphoidbomb above, we need to know what you won't do again. Please answer their questions. Next unblock reqest made without addressing this will probably be your last. Max Semenik (talk) 05:17, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sri Harsha Malempati (talk) 03:50, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand for what reason I had blocked, I will not do it again please give me a second chance Sri Harsha Malempati (talk) 02:38, 4 June 2018

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sri Harsha Malempati (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I knew my mistake (I did that without aware of copyright policy and it terms & conditions) now, I understand copyright policy,I will not upload any non-profit free license images again I will make useful contribution from now it's my promise, please unblock me Thank youSri Harsha Malempati (talk) 12:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. We told you, twice, that you had to explain our policies on copyright and non-free content in your own words. You've refused, so you have now lost access to your talk page. That leaves you with WP:UTRS, but only if you explain our policies in your own words. Yamla (talk) 12:20, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sri Harsha Malempati (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21762 was submitted on Jun 09, 2018 00:25:17. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:25, 9 June 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sri Harsha Malempati (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21780 was submitted on Jun 10, 2018 06:48:51. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:48, 10 June 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sri Harsha Malempati (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22211 was submitted on Jul 29, 2018 17:11:33. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:11, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sri Harsha Malempati (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wikipedia do not hold copyright of their content any contribution by editor is directly licensed under free software license and is co-license under creative commons attribution -shareAlike 3.0 unported license and GNU free documentation license which allows anyone reuse ,modify and redistribute, it be copyright violation copying text or images from public domain which was differentlicense other than creative commons attribution shareAlike 3.0 unported license if we want copy text or images we should have to get appropriate copyright permission from authors and should have to follow guidelines and policy of non- free content Their some exceptions for fair use tag - which one I had failed to tag it due to lack of understanding and fully aware of it I interpret copyright policy in my words as what I has understand as of ask of administration I know my mistake of copyright violations ( by repeatedly uploading copyright images without permission and use fair use tag being it , I don't do it again and I promise you I make productive contribution after approving unblock I know I did a big mistake on copyright infringement without aware of guidelines of non- free content, but I did that with curiosity of learning, Please give second chance to prove my sincerity I understand reasons why I had blocked I think it no longer need to block me Thank youSri Harsha Malempati (talk) 03:45, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 16:24, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sri Harsha Malempati (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wikipedia text and media is copyrighted Wikipedia editors is formally licensed to public under several liberal license, mostly co-license under "" creative commons Attribution -sharealike 3.0imported license "" and GNU free documentation license

The Wikipedia license grants free access to our content can be copied modified and redistributed if and only the copied version is available to acknowledge to author " permission grants under CC BY-SA license only tok be donate to Wikipedia

   If I want to import text form licensed sites I can do so if it is available under terms that compatible with CC BY-SA license

If the material(text or media) which had published recently to Wikipedia I must verify the copyright permission and have to permission from its author in formal email Wikipedia mostly prefer free content but that does not mean it don't allow non free content if I have to donate non free image i should submit authors permission in deception pages or in some situation far use conditions

It was that I had failed to do so but all my image upload are come under far use category what I did upto now with unaware of this policies it not my intention of copyright violation

    Please accept my apologies and give me second change to prove my sincerity, I do valid contribution it's my promise I don't want to leave Wikipedia I will play ceremony activity after approval of unblock

Thank you

Sri Harsha Malempati (talk) 05:13, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I can't understand what you're trying to say. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:47, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sri Harsha Malempati (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unblock request by user sri Harsha Administration asked me to interpret our policies on copyright and non free content so I interpret our policies on copyright and non free content in my own words what I had understand Wikipedia doesn't hold copyright of their content on any contribution by editors, Wikipedia contributions directly licensed either under co-license creative commons Attribution - shareAlike unproted license and GNU free documentation license which allows anyone to reuse, modify and redistribute It to be copyright violation copying text or images from public domain which has differently licensed other than creative commons Attribution shareAlike unported license if we want to use non free content text or images we should have to get appropriate copyright permission from author and have to follow guidelines & restrictions by copyright owner their are some expectations to use non free content on fair use policy if and only it is non commercial use Which one I had failed to do so and even I didn't care what other editors try to teach me I apologize for all that things, but it not intention to break our copyright policies I promise you that I make productive contribution after approval of my unblock request l made a big mistakes on copyright infringement without following guideline of non free content but I did it with curiosity of editing Please give me a second change to prove my sincerity, I understood at what reason I had blocked I think it no longer need to block me so please approve my unblock request Please approve my request I don't want to leave Wikipedia and I never give up Thank youSri Harsha Malempati (talk) 06:46, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 12:40, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sri Harsha Malempati (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm Harsha and I requesting you to unblock my account I interpret copyright policy of Wikipedia in my words The text in Wikipedia is copyright by editors is formally licensedto the public under several liberal license, most of it's images are co- license d under the creative commos Attribution-sharealike 3.0 unported license, the license Wikipedia uses grant free access to our content in the same sense that free software is licensed freely so that Wikipedia content is free to copy modify and reuse If I want to import any images that I have to found elsewhere,I can only do so if it available under terms that are compatible with the CC BY-SA license, I don't need to ensure that the imported images is available under the GNU Free documentation license, unless i was it's so sole auther I knew that I was infringe the copyrights of others without aware of it and thought that was fall under public domain, I apologise for that It was happen one year back and now I'm fully aware of our copyright policy I think it's no longer needed to block me please unblock meSri Harsha Malempati (talk) 13:08, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 14:05, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Additionally, your answers are not generally correct and your grammar is really hard to follow. --Yamla (talk) 14:05, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Sri Harsha image.jpg

The file File:Sri Harsha image.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]