User talk:Squirrel2017

Welcome!

Hello, Squirrel2017, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 17:57, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Herbert Strongeagle

Hi, I'm Ajpolino. Squirrel2017, thanks for creating Herbert Strongeagle!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hello! Thank you for your contribution! The page would be improved by going through and changing some wording to make it less promotional and more encyclopedic (the article should answer the question "who is Herbert Strongeagle?" not "how great is Herbert Strongeagle?"). If you have questions feel free to ask me at my talk page or ask at WP:TEAHOUSE. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Ajpolino (talk) 14:20, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Very little information is available on this individual and I have included what is available...the high points/important points are the only ones mentioned in resources, thus the tone of the article. I shall look about modifying the language to tone down his importance to the indigenous community as a trailblazer and incredible role model but consider it a shame that I have to do this to make it more acceptable to the Wikipedia community. Squirrel2017 (talk) 01:46, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gerald Starr (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not seeing any claims for notability in the article itself, so it fails WP:BIO. Wikipedia is WP:NOTMEMORIAL.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gerald Starr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gerald Starr, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 08:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Squirrel2017! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Clarityfiend (talk) 08:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Response: please see the discussion re: notability of Tom Longboat winners here as the same argument applies to Gerald Starr: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Herbert_Strongeagle#notability_of_Herbert_Strongeagle

None of the references cited in the draft are specifically about Starr, so he fails WP:GNG, specifically "significant coverage". If you feel otherwise, simply resubmit your draft. P.S. chapel obituary is not a WP:reliable source. Clarityfiend (talk) 18:54, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Understood but you are actually making my argument for me. The newspaper etc coverage is slim to none even for important indigenous figures.

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Poitras has been accepted

George Poitras, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Acebulf (talk) 04:08, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (George Poitras) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating George Poitras.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Nicely done article. Keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:15, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gwendolyn Lucy O'Soup Crane moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gwendolyn Lucy O'Soup Crane, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Gwendolyn Lucy O'Soup Crane) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Gwendolyn Lucy O'Soup Crane.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for developing the new article on Gwendolyn Lucy O'Soup Crane. I recommend toning down or even removing the "Indigenous Peoples History" section per Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

{{Re|Doomsdayer520}} wikipedia is not neutral in its stance on notability and requirements for notability which exclude peoples based on the dominant group's documentation, or lack thereof. I am a librarian, if that helps establish any credentials (and no, librarians are not neutral either). There is very little digital/electronic information for the time period and people in question, plus very little published in print by the people in question because of their position (non-dominant) within society. Furthermore, none of what I said should be a shock because this information is found piecemeal, within wikipedia itself. I just pulled it all together to explain why so little information is available on this notable person's life.Squirrel2017 (talk) 16:14, 6 August 2019 (UTC) gonesquirrely[reply]

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:23, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Assumption College School

I removed the cleanup tag from Assumption College School. The main issue I see with the article now is that almost all of the article's content is under the History section. The addition of a new section could fix this.☣Yutsi — Talk/Edits 21:47, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge third anniversary

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 14:16, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gerald Starr

Hello, Squirrel2017. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gerald Starr, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gerald Starr (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads more like a hagiography / dedication.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gerald Starr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gerald Starr, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:43, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gerald Starr

Hello, Squirrel2017. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gerald Starr".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:37, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gerald Starr

Hello, Squirrel2017. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gerald Starr".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:20, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]