User talk:Sportsfanrob

Sportsfanrob, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sportsfanrob! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Sportsfanrob! Thank you for your contributions. I am Masumrezarock100 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Sincerely, Masum Reza^☎ 21:03, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Come play the Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Sportsfanrob!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Sportsfanrob! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 09:03, Thursday, May 16, 2019 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Tenable

Have a rummage through the UKGameshows.com TV guides. They may help plugging gaps as to when Tenable takes breaks.--Laun chba ller 14:44, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019–20 EFL Trophy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Memorial Stadium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Gigg Lane, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:47, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bury F.C. & Gigg Lane

Hi, I'm not sure why you've restored your edit on Gigg Lane. Bury still exist as a football club, they have simply been expelled by the Football League. As such, they still own all of their assets for now, including Gigg Lane, thanks. Kosack (talk) 07:16, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits continue to misrepresent the situation the club are in. Please refrain from claims that the club have folded or been dissolved until it actually does and the information is supported by reliable sources. Kosack (talk) 07:22, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:09, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Bury F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Unexplained removal of good article icon. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:52, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Storm Lorenzo

I've noticed that you've been insistent on calling Lorenzo's extratropical remnants as "Former Tropical Storm Lorenzo" despite the general consenus to call the system "Storm Lorenzo" the name given to the system in advisories. None of your edits have any explanation and could be construed as edit warring. If you have objections to the use of the name "Storm Lorenzo" you should give your reasons at Talk:2019–20 European windstorm season rather than through editing the main article. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello, I'm Flix11. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2019–20 EFL Cup have been undone because they did not appear constructive per WP:LIVESCORES. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Flix11 (talk) 21:36, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2019–20 EFL Cup. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Flix11 (talk) 21:38, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to 2019–20 European windstorm season has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. It would also help if you check your edits before submitting using the 'Show preview' button. This way you can see the page as to how it'd look like in the live version, but without having to make an edit again. DarkShadowTNT (talk) 16:25, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 2020 World Snooker Championship. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:25, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 to 2021

Can you please stop changing dates from 2020 to 2021 when events were played in 2020, or there is no official confirmation that the 2020 event is cancelled? In the former case your edits are plainly false, and in the latter you're speculating against WP:CRYSTALBALL. Thank you. Iffy★Chat -- 18:25, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Sportsfanrob! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 20:54, Thursday, March 26, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

"Permanently cancelled"

Hello Sportsfanrob. Several editors, including myself, have repeatedly asked you not to continuously insert "permanently" to instances of "cancelled" in regards to Eurovision 2020. "Cancelled" is already a definitive adjective, and Eurovision 2020 will (as it stands currently) not be held. There is no "temporary" cancellation, wherefore no "permanent" cancellation could correspond to it. Please consult a dictionary if required and cease such disruptive edits. Regards, IceWelder [✉] 10:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2022 in British television

The article 2022 in British television has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Too early for this page; see WP:CRYSTAL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:54, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Boat Race articles

Please stop disrupting these articles. The seasons follow sequentially regardless of what happened. Two "next season" races doesn't make sense. And the 2021 dates and details have not been released so the 2021 article should be deleted as WP:CRYSTAL. These articles are good or featured quality and don't need the continual edit warring, thanks. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 10:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, stop adding things into the template which don't exist. The article you created mistakenly was deleted. Once the official date of the 2021 race is announced and we have a suitably referenced article to point to, by all means add 2021 back. Until then, just stop. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 14:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll be taking this to an appropriate venue now. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 10:43, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Little Creatures, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 15:01, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm REDMAN 2019. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Template:2020–21 Premier League table, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. REDMAN 2019 Stay at home:Protect the NHS:Save lives (talk) 11:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2019–20 National League, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye Everyone who tells me to stop Good Riddance I will log out. Sportsfanrob (talk) 10:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gigg Lane. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:51, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye Everyone who tells me to stop Good Riddance I will log out. Sportsfanrob (talk) 16:51, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 2019–20 in English football, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:31, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye Everyone who tells me to stop Good Riddance I will log out. Sportsfanrob (talk) 16:39, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020–21 EFL Trophy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2020–21 EFL Trophy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 21:52, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020–21 EFL Trophy (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tvx1 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No sources are given

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2020–21 EFL Trophy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2020–21 EFL Trophy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

T v x1 07:43, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2019–20 European windstorm season, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not add false information to articles. If you cannot add correct information to articles and contribute constructively, you will be blocked! ~ Destroyer aa (talk|Contribs) 13:15, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye Everyone who tells me to stop Good Riddance I will log out. Sportsfanrob (talk) 15:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good. And stay logged out if you want to vandalize Wikipedia again. And don't vandalize as an unregistered user/IP or else you will be blocked for Sockpuppetry. ~ Destroyer aa (talk|Contribs) 15:08, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 2021 in British television. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:37, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2021 in British television

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that 2021 in British television, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Destroyer aa (talk|Contribs) 19:21, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020–21 EFL Trophy (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at 2020–21 EFL Trophy instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2020–21 EFL Trophy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2020–21 EFL Trophy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:48, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Boat Race edits

You have been advised against this kind of thing. Please stop or I will seek a topic ban on you editing such sports articles. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 20:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye Everyone who tells me to stop Good Riddance I will log out. Sportsfanrob (talk) 21:55, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we've heard that many many times. Please, if you decide to log back in again, don't repeat the same behaviour or I will make good with the promise of seeking a topic ban on sports articles which you have continually disrupted for months. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 21:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@82.20.190.222:: Also, please don't log out then repeat exactly the same edits. It's really pretty obvious it's the same editor. If you really think we should use "COVID-XIX", please justify that view on the relevant talk pages with reference to reliable sources, rather than attempting to game the system. TSP (talk) 21:46, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:LOUTSOCK. One more of those and ANI for an indef block it is. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 23:32, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop this bizarre editing. The pandemic is called the COVID-19 pandemic, both on Wikipedia and in all reliable sources. There are no Wikipedia hits for 'COVID-XIX' that you did not put there; the only hits in newspapers I can find are jokes about ancient Rome; and a dubious political letter to an Australian newspaper, which makes me wonder if you're trying to make an inappropriate political point. Whichever it is, stop it, both as your user and as your WP:LOUTSOCK. If you really believe Wikipedia should use terminology counter to every reliable source, justify it on a talk page and get consensus. Currently, you are wasting everyone's time.

(Additionally, please do not link draft pages from main Wikipedia pages.) TSP (talk) 12:15, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye and Good Riddance I will log out again. Sportsfanrob (talk) 14:05, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't flounce at us. The complete lack of acknowledgement of why these edits are wrong is very much the issue. As stated above, any more such edits will lead to further investigation Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I SAID GOODBYE AND GOOD RIDDANCE! are you glad to see the back of me?! Sportsfanrob (talk) 20:08, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020–21 European windstorm season moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2020–21 European windstorm season, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 16:31, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editing while logged out

Hi, Sportsfanrob, I'd like to suggest you formally denote your IP as an alt account as according to your userpage you will log out and then use an IP to continue editing. It's worth reminding you that all edits you do are treated as if it is the same person (outside of WP:CLEANSTART). Also, it's very worth not getting into the realms of sockpuppetry by confusing editors to your identity if you edit under another account (which includes IPs) in such a way as to hide your identity. I haven't seen such so far, but it's very worth being transparent in this.

Also, on your userpage, you'd suggest that if you were to be blocked, you would simply logout and continue editing. I don't think it is worth mentioning, but if you were to face a block then you should not edit in any way under any account that doesn't correspond with such a block. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:19, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My reply to Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} is when I should not edit in any way under any account will it be forever until the internet is down?, Is my block going to be permanent?, Will everyone by glad to see the back of me? Other editors must wait and see. Best Wishes, Sportsfanrob (talk) 08:46, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You do not currently have a block - but if you were, you should not edit under an IP either. It's worth mentioning seeings that is what I believe you think is the case. Any block is on an individual, not an account (and I wanted you to be aware of how IPs still work with sockpuppetry. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:59, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My next reply to Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} is when I should not edit under an IP either will it be forever until the internet is down?, Is my block going to be permanent?, Will everyone by glad to see the back of me? Other editors must wait and see. Best Wishes, Sportsfanrob (talk) 13:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In the interest of transparency - I have blocked the IP address from editing - so you will need to edit logged in. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My next reply to Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} is Yes I will stay logged in for editing and Whether I'm logged in or logged out I can still view the history of edits. Best Wishes, Sportsfanrob (talk) 15:40, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds of the 80s moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sounds of the 80s, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ost (talk) 14:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sounds of the 90s

Hello Sportsfanrob,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sounds of the 90s for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the album, song or discography is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article of their own.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 11:51, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds of the 90s moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sounds of the 90s, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:28, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to 2020 EFL Trophy Final. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Please stop adding unsourced and inaccurate material to this page. Struway2 (talk) 15:37, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye Everyone who tells me to stop Good Riddance I will log out. Sportsfanrob (talk) 21:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to keep doing this every time someone asks you to modify your behaviour. At some point your disruption will raise to a point beyond WP:CIR and there will be questions asked as to whether the time you cause others to waste is proportional to your positive contribution here. At that point you might be blocked. Please, learn from the various individuals here who are trying to help you understand where you're going wrong. Continually diva-"leaving" only to return two days later to continue the ill behaviour is unacceptable. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 20:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is Everybody who tells me the ill behaviour is unacceptable glad to see the back of me? If I'm told to stop editing I'll be logged out for good! I SAID GOODBYE AND GOOD RIDDANCE! Sportsfanrob (talk) 08:42, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, people just want you to learn from your mistakes. If you don't, you will be blocked indefinitely. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 09:46, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I thought they will all be glad to see the back of me because I've been a bad editor. I will learn from my mistakes, but who will teach me? I may as well give up editing and stay logged out for good! GOODBYE AND GOOD RIDDANCE! Sportsfanrob (talk) 11:33, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Lee Vilenski was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is not an article. Do not resubmit.

Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:25, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of years in British radio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sam FM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Paddington (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. And don’t say “Good riddance I will log out now and stop editing people think I am a bad editor I will give up now and maybe for good” because that is lying and will NOT help your case. Just change your behavior, and others will leave you alone. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 23:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Me?, a liar?, How long will I be blocked for? I could ask "Will that be forever?". Goodbye and Good Riddance! Sportsfanrob (talk) 08:48, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, you won't be blocked forever, but I suggest you take a wikibreak an nor continue your disruptive editing. For example, don't add unsourced information nor overlink like this. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 14:42, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you actually listen to Lee Velinski, The Rambling Man and others, since they already warned you countless times and you don't listen! ~ Destroyeraa🌀 14:44, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Listening to any editor is the Best advice ever given Goodbye for now! Sportsfanrob (talk) 22:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think if you continue to make disruptive edits, I will report you at WP:ANI and I have little doubt that you will be banned indefinitely. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 23:17, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again! This time on Macclesfield Town F.C.. The Rambling Man, we’ve waited too long. It’s time to go to ANI. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 00:14, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some of this user’s edits are good-faith, but more than half are disruptive, such as the one to European Winter Storm Naming - WP:TOOSOON. This user has also made pointless drafts of television in 2022! ~ Destroyeraa🌀 00:16, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note about editing

Hey there Sportsfanrob!

Personally, I don't think you're a bad editor. It's just that your edits are at times disruptive and unconstructive. Please follow these steps before editing again:

Please explain your edit in a short summary before you publish your edit. This will help other editors know what you're doing. It'll also help explain your actions if someone accuses you of disruptive editing
Be open to criticism. Please work with your accusers and have a civil discussion with them. "Good riddance I will log out now bye" is not an acceptable response, since it neither helps your case nor is respectful to other editors.
Explain your edits when another editor brings up a complaint about one of your edits. This won't happen that much if you follow step 1.
Take a break from editing if another editor accuses you of disruptive editing. Use this time to follow Step 2.

Thank you for your contributions, and I hope you follow these steps in the future! ~ Destroyeraa🌀 18:35, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Stencil (typeface). Can you stop adding unsourced material? Please. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 15:04, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye Everyone who tells me to stop Good Riddance I will log out. Sportsfanrob (talk) 11:13, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok, cheers. You should know that you've been blocked for 3 months, in case you weren't aware. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 10:18, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a forbare (as I know it's coming), if you edit under an IP whilst your account is blocked, that is WP:block evasion and will be dealt with similarly. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:38, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported at the Administrator's Noticeboard/Incidents.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 15:18, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 18:58, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sportsfanrob, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

~ Destroyeraa 🌀🇺🇸 13:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sportsfanrob, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

~ Destroyeraa 🌀🇺🇸 02:13, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sounds of the 80s

Hello, Sportsfanrob. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sounds of the 80s".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sounds of the 90s

Hello, Sportsfanrob. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sounds of the 90s".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 in English football, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barnet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Firefighter strike (disambiguation)

Hello Sportsfanrob,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Firefighter strike (disambiguation) for deletion, because it is unnecessary and disambiguates only a single page.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961^Talk 13:16, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 16:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 in English football, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barnet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Faded Seaside Glamour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Long Time Coming.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 00:28, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You were invited to the ANI thread but chose not to participate. I'll add that logged-out editing was confirmed also. Drmies (talk) 00:31, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The ANI thread was at WP:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1067#Indefinite block for User:Sportsfanrob. EdJohnston (talk) 16:13, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Farewell

Farewell all wikipedia editors I knew I would be permanently blocked from editing. Sportsfanrob (talk) 14:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]