User talk:SpooderMan6920no1

MY PAGES WERE DELETED LOL LMAO XD

For anyone who stumbles across my profile I have created numerous pages, these include:

Bizzy Banks (Deleted lol)
Not Now I'm Busy - Joyner Lucas
Die Bout It - Lil Gnar
WOO Forever - Rah Swish
GNAR Lif3 - Lil Gnar (Deleted lol)
Fire Hazard - Lil Gnar (Deleted lol)
GMTO Vol.1 (Get Money Take Over) - Bizzy Banks (Deleted lol)
Same Energy - Bizzy Banks (Deleted lol)
GMTO Vol.2 (Get Money Take Over) - Bizzy Banks (Deleted lol)
Green With Envy - Tion Wayne (Deleted lol)
Young Genius - Lil Mabu (Deleted lol)
DOUBLE M'S - Lil Mabu (Deleted lol)
The Sidemen Story - Documentary film (Deleted lol)
Life Goes On - Lil Mosey (Deleted lol)
Say Dat - Rah Swish, Dusty Locane, Ron Suno, OnPointLikeOP (Deleted lol)
UNTAMED - Dusty Locane (Deleted lol)

Heavy edit contributions on Rah Swish

SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 18:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, I'm Joyous!. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ron Suno have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Joyous! Noise! 17:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, that edit was fixing an error. I am familiar with editing I forgot the details to my other user, so just picking up where I left off. Thanks SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 17:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, SpooderMan6920no1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! 14 novembre (talk) 🇮🇹 14:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Die Bout It

Hello, SpooderMan6920no1,

Thank you for creating Die Bout It.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hey. Thanks for creating this page. If the album has charted on Billboard and/or in any international markets, please add a charts section and remove the "music notability tag". Thanks. Marked as reviewed.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Trainsskyscrapers}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 18:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm CAMERAwMUSTACHE. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pop Smoke discography without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 21:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Headie One, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, SpooderMan6920no1, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Spooderman6920 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Pilaz (talk) 16:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi yes Spooderman6920 was my previous account which I unfortunately forgot the password too and had no option to reset it so made this account, I was banned immediately due to this but then unbanned once I had explained myself and my issue so multiple admins/high ranking editors should already know of this and my previous issue. Hope this clears it up :) SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 16:49, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SpooderMan6920no1: Please confirm you are aware of this policy, and please confirm you are in fact the owner of User:Spooderman6920. I am assuming good faith and assuming you are not aware of this policy, but please know that this is a final warning and that any attempt to ignore or evade this policy will be reported and may result in your editing privileges being revoked. Pilaz (talk) 16:49, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I kept the name basically identical to make it known it was a previous account owned by me as I believed it would look worse if I made a completely new username and began editing the same pages again as I am aware you are not permitted to have multiple accounts for editing, this is because it may look like you are avoiding bans etc. This is why I kept the name the same. SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 16:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: pinging you since you reviewed the last unblock request, but possibly missed the follow up message from this user; I believe that SpooderMan was trying to appeal his block on User:YeetaSkeeta in good faith (see the self-outing, diff). At any rate this is at least the fourth known account of this user (there's also User:SpooderMan6920, User:YeetaSkeeta2 - indef blocked) so it's a confirmed socking case, and this user should not be granted editing privileges until the block situation on the sockpuppet account is sorted out. I'd like to also see what Drmies has to say about this. Thank you, Pilaz (talk) 17:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was not appealing the block on Yeeta Skeeta actually, I was appealing the IP block for this account thank you very much SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 17:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pilaz: I was not even aware SpooderMan6920 was blocked as like I said previously I cannot log into that account so anything that has happened with it since the creation of this account I am unaware of SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 17:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:BLOCKFAQ. The problem is not with the account User:SpooderMan6920, the problem is that you were previously indefinitely blocked on User:YeetaSkeeta, meaning you should have stopped editing on Wikipedia until the block was lifted. Creating new accounts to circumvent your block will just result in those new accounts getting blocked... Pilaz (talk) 17:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pilaz: If I need to explain the whole situation again I will, but can you not see that I am actually editing properly? YeetaSkeeta2 was an old account which was banned for a reason I still believe was unjustified but it happened. That was when I didn't understand the site and editing rules and just wanted to edit things. I have since learned and have dedicated a lot of time and effort to helping the site and pages I am interested in which can be seen on both this account and SpooderMan6920 (locked out of) which you can see. Can you not see the dedication of me still coming back and editing, I even told you I was YeetaSkeeta2 when it had gone un-noticed and unseen for so long but I straight up told you guys and have continued editing to the standard of the site and rules and have now made many pages and edits which have been seen by many and kept. Has this gone un-noticed? Like said previously YeetaSkeeta2 was years ago now and was banned for me being a bit too gung-ho and rouge at times which is understandable but instead of being taught and shown how to edit properly I was just banned because an admin couldn't be bothered with me and didn't like me and my editing. SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 17:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your completely unsourced edit here. How is this "editing properly"? Magnolia677 (talk) 23:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

and how many other edits have been made on this site that are unsourced? yeah nice one SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 21:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yeah so looking at the lil tecca page you can very clearly see the last lead single by said artist to be sourced was "Money On Me" a song released in 2021. You tell me why you've picked my edit out of the many other unsourced ones? Just to prove a point and try get some upper hand? well done champ SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 21:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Magnolia677: Fixed it now bud :) Hope this made you slightly happier!! SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 21:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What you are saying is that because you made good contributions, we should overlook your use of other accounts, but you shouldn't have made those contributions in the first place because you were blocked. 331dot (talk) 23:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

many other editors I have been in contact with have stated they have multiple accounts also. so why just pick on me? SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 21:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which editors? Pilaz (talk) 21:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block and Unblock request

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:43, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SpooderMan6920no1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe I should be unblocked as regardless of the previous issues I clearly and evidently care about this site and the pages I have made and contributed to. I really really care about this and I enjoy the editing process and the learning involved with it. I understand the policy I have broken but I believe I have learnt from my previous issues and I understand the idea of not having multiple accounts but my reasons for it are not illegitimate or for any wrong doing as can be seen with my progress and an editor. I kept coming back and improving and learning and I was completely honest about my previous accounts and I admitted where I messed up, I understood and acknowledged that, surely that can be commended and appreciated right? I am just asking for one more chance, that is all.

Decline reason:

You claim this account was not set up illicitly. I see no evidence of that. Instead, I see it as an inappropriate sockpuppet set up to evade the block on your original account. See WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. If you disagree, if the block on YeetaSkeeta was lifted prior to you editing with this account (i.e. prior to 2024-03-23), please provide evidence of this. Looking at the block log, it looks like YeetaSkeeta was blocked on 2022-02-22 and that block is still in place. Yamla (talk) 14:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: I made this account as a replacement to the other SpooderMan account as I forgot the pass. I made that account as I wanted to continue editing wiki and making good and necessary changes yet I am being denied of that. Can you not see the determination and dedication I have? It's not like I'm vandalising and ruining pages, if that were the case then the block would be understood and I'd be on my way but I came back after learning and tried to be and do better by the guidelines of the site. As you say Yeeta Skeeta was banned in 2022 so well over two years ago now. I took a hiatus and came back with a new account (which I forgot the pass too, then made this as a replacement) and began editing properly via the feedback I had on Yeeta Skeeta and by reading the rulebook and by being helped and instructed on other wiki sites. I was never helped on here, I asked for help and got denied and banned for it, so I sought help elsewhere. I have taken years away from this site and decided I'll come back better and stronger in hopes my previous attempts had been forgotten and forgiven but I see this is not happened. I deny the sockpuppet allegations as like I said I made Yeeta Skeeta got banned (which I still believe was too abrupt and sudden), went an immature route and decided to leave the site, I then decided to come back after learning and improving on other wiki type sites and unfortunately forgot my password so had to make this account. So no I did not try to avoid a ban, I accepted said ban came back and decided to start fresh on a new clean slate. SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 14:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was illegitimate. You are not eligible for a WP:FRESHSTART. Every time you set up a new account, you make it ever less likely you personally will ever be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 15:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Well I didn't know this. I literally took a two year hiatus and came back and wanted a fresh clear slate. I don't even know if I have access to the original YeetaSkeeta account anymore. I don't remember saving the password on my computer. It may be written down somewhere but again I am unsure where that is as of right now, so even if I wanted my original account there's a chance I wouldn't of been able too. Is there any chance I can get unblocked on this account and just carry on? Forget this happened? SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 15:04, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe so. Your best bet is to go at least six months with zero edits, then apply with the oldest account you still have access to, under the terms outlined at WP:SO. Frankly, I don't believe anyone will believe your claim that you didn't know this was abusive, given the number of sockpuppet accounts that were previously blocked. But, it's up to you. Without WP:SO, I see absolutely no hope. You are much closer to a community ban than you are to being unblocked at this time. --Yamla (talk) 15:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quite frankly how dare you deny my story and claim "I didn't know it was abusive" to be completely honest no I didn't. I never knew of this rule. I made YeetaSkeeta got banned for again a very abrupt reason, I made YeetaSkeeta 2 immediately after and took an immature route which I have acknowledged on several occasions and then got banned on that account, this I agree on and the ban I took on that account. So I then took a 2 year break thinking those accounts would be fine and let go by that point but didn't have digital passwords remembered so began a clean slate on Spooderman which again for the thousandth time I forgot the pass too and to clear up confusion I made this account with an almost identical name. I deny the allegations you have thrown at me. I appreciate your help but I don't appreciate being called a liar when I have explained myself numerous times. SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 15:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will not respond further, except to oppose your unblock request if brought up for community discussion. --Yamla (talk) 16:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

can you re-add any pages i've made? SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 16:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unnecessary page deletion

@ComplexRational: please can you at least re-add my deleted pages, they were all fine and had been approved my other users who had either thanked me or added their own edits and this is unfair on them and unnecessary for the site. Yes I get it I was banned but the pages are to add to the site. Please if I'm going to ask anything more it is that you keep the pages. SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 16:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any pages created in violation of a ban or block and with no substantial edits from other users, as the pages in question were, may be deleted. I will not be restoring these pages unless another editor wishes to adopt them of their own accord; additions to the site in violation of a block are not welcome. I urge you take up the standard offer as outlined above if you wish to contribute here in the future, as the threads above aren't encouraging for you to appeal your block right now. ^Complex/_Rational 17:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just feel like none of you are understanding my point of view or argument and are far too stuck in your ways of just denying me. Anyway, do those pages still exist somewhere on the site, and if so where, or do they have to be completely remade? SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 17:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You acknowledge your block, which means you are not allowed to contribute; this is site policy and not anything personal. As far as you're concerned, the pages are gone from the site. There's nothing left to discuss here. ^Complex/_Rational 21:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But are they really gone though? I want to know exactly if they are gone forever or just in an archive somewhere. Answer me that SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh: Hey I noticed you deleted Bizzy Banks. I wanted to ask why? This page had passed notability and had had that confirmed, this can be checked via looking on Spooderman6920 (talk · contribs) talk page under the section "I have sent you a note about a page you started". Trainsskyscrapers (talk · contribs) said "Between his charting on several national charts, extensive coverage in numerous reliable music publications, and connections with other artists, this page now passes notability." With this in mind and the countless edits done by other editors I want to ask why it was deleted when ComplexRational (talk · contribs) said in this same talk page section/topic, "Any pages created in violation of a ban or block and with no substantial edits from other users", I would argue the thanks of notability and the edits, fixes and links done to this page therefore make it okay to be kept as opposed to be deleted so I am asking very nicely that you re integrate it back into the wiki, as well as his mixtapes, under your own name instead of mine (because I'm banned of course lol), as the page passed notability and Bizzy Banks as of recent is an artist that is only growing upwards and it makes sense for him to have a page on the site. Thanks SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 19:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CSD G5. Any pages created in violation of a ban or block and with no substantial edits from other users", I would argue the thanks of notability and the edits, fixes and links done to this page therefore make it okay to be kept as opposed – That's not how it works. We don't want people like you evading their blocks to create pages. So, to disincentive block evaders, we often delete what they've created. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh: "people like me" lmao. If you read my talk page you'd know that I wasn't "evading a block" as you put it, I came back after a hiatus assuming the YeetaSkeeta stuff would of been forgotten but evidently not. So I made pages I was interested in, spent countless hours of my time to do it. You say often deleted, some of my pages are still up and have had the same treatment from other editors that the Bizzy Banks page did so why is that one deleted? My guess if because you felt like it. So I again ask you very politely to re-add the page with all the things I said in my previous paragraph to you considered. SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 19:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My guess if because you felt like it. – And that clearly tells it's not worth my time to even discuss this with you. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh: No no let's discuss. My opinion and belief isn't a fact, just my opinion and belief, prove me wrong on them. I just don't think that page was necessary to be deleted just because I was banned, it's a notable page about a notable person which has been edited by others which like I said is what ComplexRational (talk · contribs) said is why other pages of mine were deleted, as other editors had barley touched them. If you disagree with their statement argue with them over it, because either you or they are not instigating the correct wiki policy. SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 19:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This will be my last reply to you, so do not ping me again. I have no intention of undeleting the articles. You were blocked for block evasion / socking, which makes the articles you've created eligible for WP:CSD G5 deletion (within reason). To discourage you from socking again in the future, I've deleted the articles. Otherwise, in idea, people evading a block would continue to return to get their way. I do not care about what you've written about, I could not actually care less about the subject matter. I deleted the articles on principle alone. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh: first of all, don't be so rude. You don't have to care what I've made or written about, but I do which is why I'm fighting you on it. The article you lined says "(if not substantially edited by others)" this page was, so therefore I don't believe it fits this criteria. Again I never evaded or "socked", I took a hiatus and came back under a clean slate, so I do not claim this accusation or "title" you and everyone else has given me. I ask you again to re-add the page. SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 19:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, you were indefinitely blocked, meaning that block will not go away until it is successfully appealed. You taking a break from Wikipedia does not give you the right to come back with a new account, independently of your contributions. WP:CLEANSLATE doesn't apply to indefinitely blocked accounts. Take a 6 month break, think about why you were blocked on your original account, and maybe you will be able to contribute collaboratively to the project again. Remember, there is no deadline on Wikipedia. Pilaz (talk) 20:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Explicit: Hey just wondering why you deleted Unatamed by Dusty Locane. This page was more than notable with it's chart history and sources used, and it also had been edited by other users, so I am just wondering why you have deleted it. I ask that you re-add it to wiki under your name instead of mine to keep it alive and active on the site as opposed to runing mine and others hard work by deleting it, thanks. --SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 19:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

@ComplexRational:, @Pilaz:, @Yamla: can I not even edit my user page? Is this part of the block or is this something else. I would like to edit my own profile page please :) especially if I have to sit tight for "six months"... gives me something to do... SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 18:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

@J04n: I just wanted to thank you for adding all the images you did to the pages I created. As you have now probably seen I have been banned for reasons I was unaware of previously, I don't claim this as my responsibility but it is what it is. But again I just wanted to thank you but unfortunately ComplexRational (talk · contribs) has deleted those pages and wasted your edits and time, so I just wanted to thank you and apologise that ComplexRational (talk · contribs), Pilaz (talk · contribs) and Yamla (talk · contribs) have been responsible for your wasted efforts. Don't worry I'm not asking you to rebel/revolt to get the pages re added (unless you want to of course, it would be very much appreciated hahaha.) Take care of yourself, I'll be back eventually, one way or another... SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 18:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging

If you ping one more person, it will be your last edit to this page. You are working incredibly hard to convince everyone it would be a terrible mistake to ever lift this block. --Yamla (talk) 19:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Well how else am I going to get someone's attention (I pinged you to get your attention). Please don't threaten me, for trying to save the pages I have created. I think it would be a great idea to unblock me personally, I think I've made some good and necessary changes to the site and made some good pages that fit notability etc. just because I ping people and want to save my creations, that doesn't indicate "working terribly hard" to be a terrible mistake to unban, it shows I care about the site and my pages. Why would someone go to the lengths I have to edit the site properly? and yet you dub me a terrible mistake to unban. SpooderMan6920no1 (talk) 19:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.