User talk:Spondoolicks
Archive 1 - August 2005 to October 2006
Remember to Forget
[edit]Sorry about that, this comic is infact very hard to come by. I came across it some time ago when it was on Topwebcomics ranking 32nd in the real life section. Since then Richard has only made one book and it dropped out of sight. I am new to this site so i just decided to write my first article about my favorite comic. I can understand if it is deleted seeing as to how it hasn't been updated in like 2 years, but i still think it should stay, if anything so people can still read a basic summery of the story. Thanks for your help, and I will try to cite my articles better. Gamewizard0380 6:50, Febuary 21
- In responce- Sadly the original links are gone. I tried every search engine possible but all I could find where mere mentions of it on forums, which i'm sure aren't enough. Please see if you can find anything for me.
My list of missing topics
[edit]Thanks, there have been other mistakes like Arcimboldi as well. If you add a note in the list others can see it more easily. And you can add any obvious redirects you notice. - Skysmith 13:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- Nice job with astronomy, mathematics, literature and Rome lists. "Integraph" is probably right, not sure about Milankovith. Hortense is a different person but I'll have to recheck that. I'll update the lists gradually later - Skysmith 11:55, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Holes
[edit]Just wanted to say how much I enjoyed the comparison involved between the relative lengths of the plot summaries for Holes and War and Peace. (On top of that: No spoiler tags for Holes!) Lawikitejana 07:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC) Update: Actually, I went back and saw that there was a spoiler tag, just no ENDspoiler tag — have now fixed that. Lawikitejana 07:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to VandalProof!
[edit]Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Spondoolicks! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego talk 20:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey, there -- sorry we weren't able to offer you better assistance at WP:PAIN. When people are so blatantly in need of blocking, you may be able to get a faster response through WP:AIV. AIV has what might be the fastest turnaround time, of all the various admin noticeboards; it focuses on a pretty narrow subset of behaviors, but it's got high traffic. Just a thought. Feel free to let me know if you need anything. Cheers! Luna Santin 23:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
<tag>...</tag>, you're it!
[edit]Hey skciloodnops,
Just noticed that you'd contributed to the Bob Kevoian page about a year ago... I am acquainted with a couple of folks from the Bob & Tom Show and have been monitoring edits there for a month or so.
We've recently had an interaction on a Yahoo group as you might remember! :-)
Stay well,
Lmcelhiney 18:09, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi why have you deleted my web address from the links area of Brentwood? The link has nothing to do with you and i would ask you not to do it again please!
brentwood
[edit]Hi why have you deleted my web address from the links area of Brentwood? The link has nothing to do with you and i would ask you not to do it again please!
Possible renaming of Wikipedia:WikiProject Saints
[edit]It has been suggested that the above named project be renamed Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian saints. Please express your opinion on this proposed renaming, and the accompanying re-definition of the scope of the project, here. John Carter 17:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Would you mind having another look at this talk page? We seem to have a moving consensus...--Ioshus(talk) 01:38, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Plutarch
[edit]Hi, Spondoolicks. Hello, it's me, who has been changing user name, lately. I share my birthday month with Prince William.
About the articles, actually, I have been checking all available original historical source, which can be found, in Internet. Logically, Plutarch is more complete. With Solon, I added much of Aristotle, too, but some previous user had been there, too, so it doesn't show. Plutarch had been recognized, almost during two thousand years, by occident. He used sources, which aren't longer available, but his works have been recognized further. I wrote the stuff, pointing the source in detail, so anyone can add more, pointing his sources, too. Bye. --Theonewhoisawitch 02:03, 20 March 2007 (UTC)theonewhoisawitch
Wikifun
[edit]Am I supposed to tell you when I answer one of the questions? I answered #6. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 00:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Round 14 is starting just about now. --Spondoolicks 16:58, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the message, but I just got it now and it's already too late... :-( ! (Well, not 13 days without wikipedia, but without logging in...) — MFH:Talk 14:23, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Jensen hierarchy
[edit]Sorry to bother you but, I saw the request for this article, I have checked a few online mathematic journals and haven't seen it. But I did find a sociologist called Arthur Jensen who talked about hierarchies. Could this be a non-math subject? Thank you. The Isiah 01:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- I was searching for Jensen hierarchy (to create the article) and found this post. I am guessing that you were the one who submitted the request (based on post above). I was wondering if this: [1] was what you were talking about. If so, I have to say, I don't think it will be made anytime soon. It is far too complex for a normal editor to create. If you were the one who added it, maybe you could help us (me) out. It has been on the list for a long time to create it, and it would be great to have. Hope I can help. - ђαίгснгм таιќ 04:38, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Spondoolicks
[edit]Hey, I was wondering where you came up with your name... I have only seen this word (with similar spelling but not exact) in a caption from Charlie Chaplin's movie The Floorwalker. I'm interested in tracking down some more references to the word. User:Pedant (talk) 07:08, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Julian the Apostate article renaming
[edit]I have recently filed a request to have the page moved so that 'the Apostate' will be removed. If you support (or oppose) the removal of this descriptor, please voice your opinion at Talk:Julian the Apostate Thegreyanomaly (talk) 06:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Spondoolicks!
| You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity
The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented. |
|
You are receiving this invitation because you are a member of one of the related Christianity Projects and I thought that you might be interested in this project also - Tinucherian (talk) 04:58, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Ichthus: January 2012
[edit] |
ICHTHUS |
| January 2012 |
In this issue...
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
Please remember that if you create an article with a tite which needs a disambiguation, you need to make a link to it from the plain title - in this case I've added a hatnote at Kirk Watson, in some cases it's a matter of adding to a disambiguation page. Help readers to find your article! PamD 21:07, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Request for consensus for editing Template:Catholicism
[edit]
You are invited to join the discussion at Template_talk:Catholicism#Edit_request_on_7_December_2012 to edit the list of Doctors of the Church to add John of Avila and Hildegard of Bingen and do this by embedding Template:Churchdoctor. I am messaging you because you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 17:11, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Spondoolicks. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The page File:Image-Wikifun-Round14-3.png has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appeared to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:25, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Image source problem with File:Wikifun-14-extra1.JPG
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Wikifun-14-extra1.JPG.
This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.
If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:27, 1 November 2020 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:27, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Image source problem with File:Wikifun-Round14-1.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Wikifun-Round14-1.jpg.
This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.
If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:27, 1 November 2020 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:27, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Image source problem with File:Wikifun-Round14-2.JPG
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Wikifun-Round14-2.JPG.
This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.
If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:28, 1 November 2020 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:28, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Image source problem with File:Wikifun-Round14-4.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Wikifun-Round14-4.jpg.
This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.
If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:29, 1 November 2020 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:29, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
