Jump to content

User talk:Spondoolicks/Archive1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Have you really gone through the first 250 pages of the Ps in the 404 dead links? That is impressive! I wanted to know what your thoughts are about linking to the internet archive. Perhaps with a little help we can get through the Ps which would at least be newsworthy Juliusross 11:25, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It would be impressive wouldn't it. Actually someone else did up to around number 160 so I can't take so much credit. As for your question about the internet archive, I have no thoughts about this as I was unaware of its existence. It should be really useful for some of the dead links though so I'll have a look. It's nice to know someone else is out there willing to help out with this mammoth task. --Spondoolicks 11:49, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I am not making promises. Also I wonder if the number of dead links is not growing beneath this list. Juliusross 00:03, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This list was created nearly two months ago and there are sure to be more dead links by now but that doesn't mean these don't need fixing. If you get fed up that's fair enough and there are plenty of other ways which you may prefer to contribute to Wikipedia. Personally I'm finding it quite satisfying working through a big list like this, and I'm learning some things in the process. I'm thinking of applying to go on Mastermind - specialist subject: Things beginning with P.--Spondoolicks 14:09, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

[edit]

Hello Spondoolicks/Archive1, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips:

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, Alphax τεχ 13:48, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MIND

[edit]

OK, I'll do it within the next week (if there is anyone still working on it...) Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 16:24, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MIND 22:24, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit]
Challenge yourself, and get ready to think!

Hello! Thank you for participating in Round Two of the Wikipedia:Mind Benders! The round will officially close on Friday, September 16, and round three (which is complete) will be open in the immediate days after that. A notice will be sent to you at least 48 hours before round three is set to open, to insure fairness. Round three offers 11 new exciting questions, this time written by Deryck C.. Please be sure to join in the fun! Also, congratulations to Riffsyphon1024 for winning our logo competition! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 20:30, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy using the NotificationBot (thanks to AllyUnion for designing such a great bot!). If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. If there are any problems with the bot, please alert AllyUnion. Thanks!

Automatic notification done by NotificationBot ((talk). Any bugs or errors, please report to bot owner. --NotificationBot 22:24, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MIND 06:19, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello, Spondoolicks/Archive1! This message is to inform you that round three of Wikipedia Mind Benders will open on Wednesday, September 21, at approximately 22:00 UTC. While the opening time may vary by two or three hours, the round will open no earlier than 22:00 UTC. In addition, there are several rule changes, which will be detailed when the round opens. Everyone who answers a question correctly will receive points, but speed does give some extra points! Round three offers 11 new exciting and mind-bogglind questions, written by Deryck C.. These promise to be lots of fun! We sincerely hope you join us.

Also, congratulations to ROYGBIV for winning round two; it was an extremely close game, with the runner-up, Spondoolicks, only two points behind. Let's keep round three competitive! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:31, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy using the NotificationBot (thanks to AllyUnion for designing such a great bot!). If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. If there are any problems with the bot, please alert AllyUnion. Thanks!

Automatic notification done by NotificationBot ((talk). Any bugs or errors, please report to bot owner. --NotificationBot 06:19, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MIND 06:22, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello, Spondoolicks/Archive1! This message is to inform you that round three of Wikipedia Mind Benders will open on Wednesday, September 21, at approximately 22:00 UTC. While the opening time may vary by two or three hours, the round will open no earlier than 22:00 UTC. In addition, there are several rule changes, which will be detailed when the round opens. Everyone who answers a question correctly will receive points, but speed does give some extra points! Round three offers 11 new exciting and mind-bogglind questions, written by Deryck C.. These promise to be lots of fun! We sincerely hope you join us.

Also, congratulations to ROYGBIV for winning round two; it was an extremely close game, with the runner-up, Spondoolicks, only two points behind. Let's keep round three competitive! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:31, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy using the NotificationBot (thanks to AllyUnion for designing such a great bot!). If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. If there are any problems with the bot, please alert AllyUnion. Thanks!

Automatic notification done by NotificationBot ((talk). Any bugs or errors, please report to bot owner. --NotificationBot 06:22, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Vandalism by user 64.18.36.7

[edit]

It's possible but—given their disparate editing habits—unlikely. I can't resolve the IP, but I'm guessing it's either a dynamic address, or one shared by a network. There is a way to confirm sockpuppets, but only a certain few have the permission level to do so. See m:CheckUser for a discussion on this; you'll see that the use of this function is controversial, and that it is usually reserved for urgent cases. In any event, thank you for the note. Cheers, -- Hadal 12:13, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

re: Society Portal - Categories Section

[edit]

This was a bit of a quick hack when I changed Category:Society to use Template:PortalPage, since there is no place to put the special topics on that template and having a list of categories seems a bit redundant now the portal is on the category page. I don't think I am qualified to judge what should be on this specific portal, so if somebody wants to change this I would have no problem with that. --R.Koot 15:53, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re:People's Progressive Party (Malaysia)

[edit]

Sorry, can't find the link. It seems permanently dead. Johnleemk | Talk 16:52, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Nowina Coat of Arms

[edit]

I don't know that much about coa, but I got in touch with the author of the pictures (Emax has unfortunately stolen the pics from his website and book). I got the permission to use the current pictures and upload the new ones (under smaller size-150px), and now face the job of tagging all the pictures just as with Image:Herb Abdank.jpg. Perhaps you could help? If there is any specifc reason for your interest with Nowina, I can give you the email of the author (he wrote a book on the Polish coats of arms) or if you cannot speak Polish, email him mysself with your question. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:21, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I know nothing about Poland, heraldry or Polish heraldry. I'd love to know more but until I do I can't really help with this article. I came across it as I was undoing the edits of a minor vandal and noticed it needed some work. I thought you may be able to help as you have contributed to Polish heraldry so I'm sorry to have landed this on you. --Spondoolicks 15:56, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Halibutt 21:25, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MIND

[edit]

Hello. Round four of Wikipedia Mind Benders will open on Thursday, December 1. This round will be drastically different from round three; part one will consist of a creative project, and part two will be developed from there. The full details will be released when the round opens. Time and speed should not be major factors in this round; thus, there is no exact opening time for the round as speed will not factor into the scoring. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 22:49, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Please add Wikipedia:Mind Benders/to do to your watchlist to receive further announcements; the NotificationBot is currently down and all notifications will be placed on that page. Sorry for any inconvenience.

Note: This message has been sent by Flcelloguy. If you do not wish to receive further messages regarding WP:MIND, please contact Flcelloguy. Special thanks to Fetofs for helping distribute this message.

Re: Tapasya

[edit]

You're most welcome. Good luck on all endeavors holmes - User:Rama's Arrow

Graeme Lawton Afd

[edit]

Thanks for reverting my vote. Dlyons493 Talk 21:27, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I'll create an updated list soon. It does take a long time to run. But soon... Promise! - Marumari 04:58, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done! -- Marumari 01:13, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Byron redirect

[edit]

It seems to me that to redirect a common name to one person when there is a disambiguation page is wrong... If you wnat the page Byron (disambiguation) fine, but then Byron should redirect there and not to one person, even as well known as Lord Byron is. That's what disambiguation is all about. The links should be changed and corrected in any event with a pipe edit to be direct. This is the type of thing IMO that some concensus should be gained on before action. Doc 21:49, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: WP:MIND

[edit]

Glad you liked the changes. I don't see a problem with adding wiki-links. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 22:09, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia:Wikifun

[edit]

Hi, I've noticed you've taken part in Wikifun before.

Just to let you know, Round 11 begins today at 0900 GMT. Dmn 04:26, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for fixing these dead links. Appreciated! ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 16:17, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Odd paragraph added by User 193.62.205.209

[edit]

What is a Swedish?? 345 pilgrimer omkom i Mecka Folkmassan fick panik - pilgrimerna trampades ihjäl Inga svenskar uppges ha skadats. Radio "Alla svenskar mår bra" had Hallak från Islamiska förbundet är en av de svenska pilgrimerna. TV Över 2 miljoner pilgrimer samlade i Mecka.

Tänk om!

As I don't speak Swedish I have no idea what this is about - especially since on other pages this user has claimed he is Chilean. Perhaps this is Erik Bongcam-Rudloff (Chilean born, Swedish scientist) and he's trying to mess with my head for being the only one to vote delete on his article's AfD nomination.
Either that or the signals being beamed into my brain by CIA satellites are making me paranoid. --Spondoolicks 11:01, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Since I happened to trace the edits by 193.62.205.209, (after rv some of his edits at the John Ausonius article) and found my way to this, I might as well tell you what the Swedish text he published here means: (it is a little weirdly written, but here we go):

345 pilgrims dead in Mecka – The mass of people panicked – the pilgrims were tramped to death – no Swedes have been reported injured - Radio – “All Swedes are fine” – had Hallak from the Islamic League is one of the Swedish pilgrims – TV – over 2 million pilgrims were gathered in Mecka. – What if! Bronks 13/1 2006

Oh. How strange. Thanks for the translation. --Spondoolicks 13:21, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to have helped. Bronks 13/1 2006

Wikifun round 12

[edit]

This is to invite you to participate in the next game of Wikifun.
Round 12 will begin at 11:00 UTC on Friday January 20. 2006.
-- Ravn 17:19, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

St John Bosco

[edit]

There has been some additions to the John Bosco page saying he was a closest homosexual or pederast. This is not NPOV.

Do you agree?evrik 23:25, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiprojects Saints

[edit]

Something new ...

This user is a member of the Saints WikiProject.

--evrik


WooPS

[edit]

Thanks for catching my typo in creating The Big Woo! Someday I will get my brain properly connected to my fingers, and then, lookout world!

Atlant 16:31, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Philip Neri

[edit]

Upon what basis do you call me a vandal? Ian Spackman 22:02, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your good-natured reply. I beg to differ. Ian Spackman 09:31, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Preventing an edit war on the saints

[edit]

It was the established operation of the WikiProject Saints to have a section in the info box on a sample prayer. Some editors have been recently been attacking this in the individual articles.

It is my belief that prayers in a literary or historic context are NPOV. I can understand that some may consider the inclusion of a prayer to be hagiographic, but freedom of religion is not freedom from religion.

There is a 3RR about to happen on a number of these articles. I am trying to be philosophical about this, but don’t want to yield the point when what is happening goes against the consensus and borders on vandalism.

It is my understanding that if an editing disagreement occurs that the status quo, in this case leaving the prayers in place, holds until it is resolved. I encourage you to comment on this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Saints. I have posted my thoughts at the village pump.

--evrik 15:14, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Rita of Cascia

[edit]

I just deleted your edits. Sorry! --evrik 22:20, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed event policy for Wikicalendar

[edit]

I recently posted some ideas about developing criteria for what should and should not be listed on Wikicalendar events at the Wikicalendar's talk page. Since you're actively involved in this project, I thought I'd let you know so that you can comment or add more suggestions. Thanks :). Fabricationary 23:44, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Islamikaze up for deletion

[edit]

Greetings, it may interest you to know that the article Islamikaze is up for deletion. Netscott 09:57, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great Priestly quote

[edit]

We get the reverse of that, too, whenever an American does a study abroad program in Britain. They always come back with a mockney (ie Madonna) accent and a bunch of complaints about the unavailability of HP sauce. Oh, and thanks for moving the useful bit of commentary by that guy over to Talk:Hot dog. Cheers youngamerican (talk) 12:34, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks . . .

[edit]

for the encouragement. It's much appreciated. At any sign of incipient monster-ness don't hesitate to so advise. Best. FuCyfre 13:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See also - Gamesmanship

[edit]

'See also' is a place to put links to articles about similar subjects. In football a player can be penalised for "time wasting" or other offences which are not strictly defined within the rules and might come under the heading of gamesmanship. It used to be called "ungentlemanly conduct". Now they call it "unsportsmanlike conduct". Diving used to fall into this category, however it is now specifically prohibited under the law related to "simulation". Jooler 09:23, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See -

Unsporting

[edit]

If football, gamesmanship is covered under unsporting behaviour. Specifically in the LOTG - Law 12 - Decision 5 states "Any simulating action anywhere on the field, which is intended to deceive the referee, must be sanctioned as unsporting behaviour" Jooler 14:04, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Our article on football states - In particular, the offence of "unsporting behaviour" may be used to deal with most events that violate the spirit of the game, even if they are not listed as specific offences. Misconduct may be punished by a caution (yellow card) or sending-off (red card). - and so covers gamesmanship. Jooler 14:14, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The point is - previously there was no specific mention of "diving" or simulation as the IFAB call it. It is was covered by unsporting behaviour (formerly ungentlemanly conduct) i.e. gamesmanship, but now there is specific mention of it as a form of unsporting behaviour. You can't "cheat" if there's no rule banning it. It is up to the discretion of the referee how he interprets a dive and whether he issues a caution, or at least it was - now the Decision 5 of Law 12 insists that it must be punished. Jooler 14:22, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Avery

[edit]

Because of your edits on the Kimya Dawson article, I was hoping you would look at this article on her friend and fellow performer Ryan Avery, and lend your comments on the corresponding AfD. Thanks! PT (s-s-s-s) 23:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why church dedications are important

[edit]

If someone was looking up a particular village to find out about it's history, the church played such an important part in English rural history that information about the church is important information that needs to be in the article. The dedication isn't the only piece of info that should be there either, information about the structure and design of the church and where in the parish it is can tell you so much about the history of the wider village. You mention that it is no more important than who the school is named after and the like: this is also information that should be included in my opinion: why the school is named after a particular person can also expand and illustrate the history of the location. Saying that the local shop is a Tesco's is going a bit far though... -- Roleplayer 14:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Spondoolicks/Archive1&oldid=1139085922"