User talk:Spliffy/Archive 2

2

Family Guy

My deletion (which you reverted) was not vandalism; in fact it was removing a section containing irrelevant and trivial comparisions between "Family Guy" and "The Simpsons." 138.16.27.168 01:56, 27 January 2006 (UTC) then please use an apprpriate edit ummary to diplay why you sleted a large chunk of the article, the article come under almost contant vandalism attack and we are not physicBenon 01:57, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NO it is YOU whom vandalized MY article. Tis true that I'm new to the site, but it's not fair to offer people the chance to add to the site then delete OR edit what is written. It's not nice. So bite me, ass holes.Insert non-formatted text hereuser:24.158.235.98 2:02 27 january 2006 (utc)

Drunk with power

Just look how much this guy moves and edits, some one should edit him right out of the site. It would seem he's drunk with power.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.158.235.98 (talk • contribs) 2:05 in fact i have no more power than you do to do anything inside wikipediaBenon 02:07, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

bite me AND stop moving folks articles—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.158.235.98 (talk • contribs) 2:11

Succesful RfA!

Thank you for your support during my RfA! The community has decided to make me an administrator, and there's work to be done. I look forward to seeing you around the project in the future, and if you see me do anything dumb, let me know right away! Regards, CHAIRBOY (☎) 23:44, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hi, I did not know it was vandalism to remove content. Sorry. I do believe the content in question is biased against Jehovah's Witnesses in the general tone and style. It's the same for the Awake! and Watchtower entries, and therefore I was only removing what I thought was biased. The sort of writing in there would never get into Encyclopedia Britannica, so how can it be gotten away with on here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.114.15 (talk • contribs)

response on their talk pageBenon 01:34, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't this a public user editable site though, hence the whole point of it being a wiki? I simply edited the article. I did not add any pro-JW comments, nor change the sense of the article, simply removed the biased comments. I will report it as you say, but I must say you're a very unfair moderator for what is a publically-editable site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.114.15 (talk • contribs)

reply on their talk pageBenon 01:45, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted - Let's call it a day. 86.136.114.15 01:59, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have a cucumber

		An Award
		I award this Barnstar to Benon for being cool and helping teh n00bs :P --Shanel 02:07, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet use

Hi Benon. Just to let you know 85.96.134.129 is a sockpuppet of User:-Inanna-. This edit proves it. She is using it to avoid the 3RR on various articles. Please do something about it, as she has done stuff like this in the past. Thanks. --Khoikhoi 01:35, 29 January 2006 (UTC) umm im not an admin but i have now alerted User:Shanel via irc to the problemBenon 01:41, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WHY DID YOU REVERT THE KURDISH ARTICLE.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.196.139.250 (talk • contribs) because you removed large sections of the article with no disscusion, thats it nothing sinisterBenon 06:11, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but may I ask why you revert the Kurdish article.

Kurds are ethnic Iranians and you can see it by reading the articles. Also they is something that is untrue saying Kurdish is banned from being taught in Iran. That is unture, Iran was the only state to allow Kurdish to be taught freely and there are links in the discussions to prove it. So please revert it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.196.139.250 (talk • contribs) if you belive this then please discuss it on the articles talk page Benon 06:13, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, Wikipedia is amazing.

I noticed messages at our highschool computers about vandlism, so I figured I'd try it and see how fast it would take for an article to get cleaned up.

It was within the minute, you are an amazing admin :O —Preceding unsigned comment added by JadedMaple (talk • contribs) response on talk pageBenon 06:28, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Confused on what spam was added?

Sorry for whatever spam was added, but I did not. In fact, I was subject to the repeated problems that Ray corrected. Best, George, http://www.vlib.us/glaughead.html 67.66.102.94 14:55, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it was you personally your probably on a dynamic ip, but the previous user was directing pepole too a "fake rolex" site, to avoid porblems like this in the future why not sign up for an accountBenon 15:42, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Since there has been active problems with changes to sites related to the WWW-Virtual Library (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:World_Wide_Web_Virtual_Library ) is it possible for someone to fake an IP address? I believe it is, but don't know how. 67.66.102.94 00:39, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

email

Can you enable your email? I wish to send you an email. NoSeptember ^talk 17:03, 29 January 2006 (UTC) reply on users talk pageBenon 17:04, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reply

Hah, I promise I won't.

Well good luck with your goals.

JadedMaple 17:34, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for your welcome message, but I'm just adding interwikis to the Portuguese Wikipedia... I really don't need to sign up, but thanks for your concern. Have a nice Day! Ruela 201.36.98.60.

ah ok, whenver i see an anon making good edits i welcome them, Benon 19:59, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DA and T-man

Benon, perhaps you could explain why are are now seeking to have me banned from editing certain pages? My reply to your motion can be found here. Please tell me how I have been uncivil to T-Man since the block lifted, with a link to that uncivil edit, or how I have wikistalked, since both Batman and Enemies of Batman are on my usual edit lists without any need for me to refer to T-man's edits. Thank you. Dyslexic agnostic 02:40, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

its a pre-emptive motion, not for a pemanant but temporary injunction, its alos nothing perosnal but i motioned it for both of you, its also the arbitraters decision and not mineBenon 02:43, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate it's not personal, but I also see it as a drastic request. If either of us act uncivil or inappropriately, then a block will suffice. For my part, I confirm again that I have no intent to ever be uncivil to T-man again. Dyslexic agnostic 02:46, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yes you recent civility is much improved and that something to admire, however it is upp to the wiser than me arbcomBenon 02:47, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here is proof that I am really trying to work with T-Man... see his message to me regarding Enemies of Batman, and my reply... Dyslexic agnostic 06:34, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thats fine, present it at the arbitration and the motion will probably be rejected, i didnt make the request lightly and its now out of my hands Benon 06:35, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Dyslexic agnostic 06:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you should be aware of the latest developments: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic/Evidence#Fourth asserion. Dyslexic agnostic 16:52, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advocate

I want an advocate. A wikipedia advocate, partial on my behalf. I won't state anything. I'm serious.--T-man... ""worst vandal ever"" 03:27, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool... I didn't know about advocates. I told T-man to go to Wikipedia:AMA Advocates accepting inquiries to get one. I also signed up as one (I guess I can't be T-man's though...) Dyslexic agnostic 04:30, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic

Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Kelly Martin (talk) 02:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confuded who are you implying that is stalking who? I remind you that I accused DA of wikystalking and DA admitted to be monitoring me "3rd thing on the morning" and his edits were just blind reversings (always erasing my words rather than repracing or at least askme for sourcing) and when he #wrote, the info content several big factual mistakes and ofenses on the summary. To me that's unethical. ... I acused him with several editors and nobody cared. Recently I though It was ok, so I went with a "if I can't against him I'll do the same (which apparently was ok). I have to say that I was invited by DA to edit the first article I knew he was there first beforehand. That was the limited series article, but my edits didn't erase his words and the changes I did didn't clash even with DA's interests. I was just acting a little bolder with a merge of 3 other articles he might started but were on a "stub" state and renamed a page wit a name everybody seems to like (list of maxiseries) then I had some mistakes but I got help before on good time. I never wrote about anything I didn't know about and didn't erase any dyslexic words. Then I went to a page and undid a blind reverse DA did on an editor I related to and felt that if he was goingto erase whatever I wrote, I could rewrite at least whatever he erased unfearly. Remember that by then I started dobting acting the way DA did was bad practice. Shanel and your words to him were the first I can recall telling him to stop.--T-man... ""worst vandal ever"" 04:35, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

im trying to imply wiki-stalking has taken place, its up to the arbitration comitte to see whos wiki-stalking who and if in fact theres even been wiki-stalkingBenon 04:40, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photo, Emma Watson

[Look] Why did you delet this version? I've written the copyright license and we're I got the photo from under the photo, so it was legal because the man who tooked this photo allowed everyone to use them. And this is more allowed than to use photos of Warner Brothers... unsigned comment by FallingDown

huh i didnt delete anything in fact im not een an admin, but by looking at the picture no-ones determined its copyright status so it will be deletedBenon 01:02, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allosaurus

To Benon,

I attempted to make one small change in wording to the "Allosaurus" article, but after I pressed the SAVE button, the entire article disappeared. This was not intentional. Can you take care of the restoration for me. I do not know how to do it.

Thank you,

Simon —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.147.242.4 (talk • contribs) .

done, by me whilst you whre typing this!Benon 20:26, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two notes on reverting edits

I see you reverted an edit of mine [1]. Because you didn't provide a comment, I can't tell why you did it. I assume that since it was a rather odd edit, you made a simple mistake, no big deal. But you should be careful when you revert with a script, since it makes such errors much more likely. Also, I'd made some ten other simmlar edits before you rolled back that one, yet you didn't touch those edits or contact me. If indeed you though you saw vandalism you really should have checked my contribs to make sure there wasn't more. (If you had I would have expected you to roll it all back, or figure out what I was doing and undo your first rollback, or at least contact me)... In any case, it's all good. Happy editing. --Gmaxwell 20:43, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ahh yes because unless you have the owners permisson you cant "blank" user pages was my understading so i revrted it, the script isnt a script at all but navagation popups which allow 1 click reverts but i still have to look at it and everything, sorry Benon 03:43, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's all okay. I would have talked to the user.. but he hasn't edited since 2004, so it's insanely unlikely that he would either reply or care! :) --Gmaxwell 05:05, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

why

Yeah, why was the edits reverted back to the old version. It wasn't vandalism I did. Trent McMartin works for Aversion.com and volunteers for Everythingrock.com. I wanted to include that.

thegreatone

Hi, someone (SoothingR) keeps sending me messages asking me to "stop deleting" passages from the article on Plagiarism. I don't know what they're talking about. I haven't looked at that article for weeks. I did edit some "examples of plagiarism" that were simply allegations and their inclusion most probably politically motivated, but that was a few weeks back. I responded to SoothingR but I keep getting messages. Is there something that can be done against some erroneously sent (or harrasing) messages? Thanks! 130.113.105.43 11:44, 30 January 2006 (UTC) responce on there talk pageBenon 13:22, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allosaurus Resurrected

To Benon,

Thank you for directing me to Wikipedia's instructions for reverting a page. Also, I see that you have "resurrected" Alloaurus for me. Many thanks,

Simon—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.147.242.4 (talk • contribs) .

your very welcome always glad to helpBenon 14:45, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trent McMartin article

Plagerism? I wasn't talking about an article about plagerism. I was refering to a piece on journalist Trent McMartin, which you edited a few days ago after I made my edits. I'm not some vandal but a freelancer who is updating the profile on fellow journalist Trent McMartin

thegreatone aka John M.

huh?Benon 08:39, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA did not pass

I regret to inform you that your RfA was closed early today by bureaucrat Raul654 as a failing RfA. Please do not take this as a condemnation of you or your contributions to Wikipedia. RfAs are only an assessment of the community's opinion about your potential as an administrator at this point in time, not for all time. I encourage you to take the lessons from your now closed RfA and use them to improve yourself as a Wikipedian. You are of course welcome to apply again for administrator rights at a later date. I recommend you wait at least a month, if not two or three months. If you have any questions on this, please feel free to ask me. --Durin 16:24, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you didn't get adminship, you're very welcome with regards my support. Don't take it personally, a lot of people prefer editors to have been here at least 3 months before they will vote for them. Keep up the good work! Steve block talk 20:08, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot believe you'd do this...

...but you're creating a lot of user pages all under your name to offend other users. Either you, or someone else using your computer, maybe?

This is called vandalism, and good Wikipedians (like me) will not tolerate it. (How ironic of you to do something like that...)

See Curps' user log for evidence.

So please stop. Thank you. --Slgrandson 19:38, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reply on their talk pageBenon 19:41, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

are you talking about this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Imposters_of_Benon because they arent me but an immposter Benon 19:41, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

oh and any username with the name "benon" is falgged on the cvu bot and these ages are created to tag them with the imposter tag, feel free to verify that with crupsBenon 19:43, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ahh i think i see where your coming from now, an imposter is creating accounts with those disgusting names and im tagging them as imposter accounts after curps has blocked them, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Imposters_of_Benon for all the accounts, the page becomes created because of me crating it with the imposter tag i think thats what you think is happening feel free to ask anymore questions you have Benon 19:46, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just to verify, yes, this is what he's doing.--Shanel 19:47, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My dearest apologies...

Knowing how the newbie process goes just right now, you can at least forgive me for accusing you yesterday of creating those accounts. I'm definitely so sorry...

I now understand that other people, not the subjects of attack, create such things to offend those users. So if you understand too, I won't be bothering you about it again. Thanks. --Slgrandson 00:26, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't doubt you, but

What's with this?

no problem i was just a bit taken aback,yeah that userpage was vandalised so i revreted it back from the attacking edit :)07:25, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

My RFA

Hi Spliffy/Archive 2, thanks for participating in my RfA discussion. Unfortunately, my fellow Wikipedians have decided at this time that I am not suitable to take on this additional responsibility, as the RfA failed with a result of 66/27/5 (71.0% support). I hope that if I do choose to reapply in the future, the effort I will make in the meantime to improve and expand my contributions to Wikipedia may persuade you to reconsider your position from neutral. All the best, Proto t c 10:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

vandal 212.219.90.14

about 212.219.90.14 ... could you smack this guy or something for me? i saw your warning on his talk page, but he's still on changing stuff as i post this... i'd stay up and revert but i gotta get to bed :) thanks :) --timeheater 12:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)````[reply]

reply on there talk pageBenon 12:47, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

worldtimezone.com web site links are appropriate links and very useful for people around the World

Hi, I believe that worldtimezone.com web site links are appropriate links and very useful for people around the World. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Worldtimezone (talk • contribs) . someones alredy explained it on there talk page and i dont wanna bite ;-)Benon 22:44, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Judge John Deed

Hi - I saw you remove "dead" links in this article - I thought the idea of leaving red links was to encourage editors to add new articles on the given subject? Obviously they can be overdone, but not I believe in this case. Stephenb (Talk) 18:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC) i remove "dead links" because they have a tendency to frustrate pepole, especially new users, whom can find it especially confusing ;-)Benon 22:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Thanks!

Okay, this is perhaps a bit overdue, but thank-you for your support in my recent RfA! I passed with a final ~~vote count~~ consensus of (82/1/0), which was a lot of support that I really appreciate. I'll try to live up to the expectations; and on that note, if there's ever something I do wrong (or don't do right), please spit in my general direction. Cheers! --P e ruvianLlama^(spit) 05:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your RFA

Hi! Your RFA was unsucessful as it failed to garner the required level of support. (I have ignored the sock votings). The main reason seems to be the lack of time spent on this project, so I suggest you contribute more to the article and wikipedia namespaces. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 08:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If Oppose>Support, I consider it as a failed RFA. (Though I also use the term in the edit summary for RFAs that do not pass.) Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 11:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep your chin up benon, you'll get it in a few months :-) Hope I still see you around CVU :-D --light darkness 16:29, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for your support on my request for adminship. It ultimately succeeded with votes of 52/1/2, so I am now an administrator. Should you have any questions, comments, complaints, or requests at any point in the future, please do not hesitate to let me know on my talk page or via e-mail.

—bbatsell ¿? 05:18, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Errors

Well it doesn't actually break, since it carries on...

You have four problems there which relate to two real problems, I know about both:

exceptions.RuntimeError: dictionary changed size during iteration this is when deciding where to route messages, it's indicative of routing changes whilst it is processing a message. I have a fix for this, but the upshot is that a message (user input rather than rcevent) might not get processed.
exceptions.KeyError: "january 2017" and exceptions.KeyError: "fortnight" these are part of the block length, when trying to work out block conflicts and auto-blacklist length. The options WP allows are very flexible, so it just covers the common ones, if it doesn't understand it will auto-bl for a week and not do block conflict processing. This is a bug which stops it realising that it doesn't know the correct length. Upshot is that auto blacklisting doesn't occur. I have a fix for this too..

--pgk^(talk) 07:32, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

featured article

Hello. It seems to have stopped but if he tries older vandals, then there are admins watching the article to block any. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 23:00, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Angela Bofill copyvio

Thanks for telling me about the speedy delete rule for copyvios. Are you sure it applies to articles that are less than 7 days old? I noticed a template the specifies 48 hours: Template:Db-copyvio. The "Angela Bofill" article was created less than 48 hours ago, so it would qualify for speedy either way. Thanks again. - ApolloCreed 01:19, 12 February 2006 (UTC) response on there talk pageBenon 01:20, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prod

When listing articles (Brian Hale) for prod please provide a rational because they appear on thiss log page. Broken Segue 15:52, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

oops sorry, oversight on my part there problem fixed. thanks for pointing it out to me :)Benon 16:17, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently there's a misunderstanding

You recently left a personal attacks flag on my talk page regarding comments I left on PilotGuys page. I don't seem to understand. All my comments were professional and objective in both tone and content, and were made, I might add, in response to his agressive attempts at reverting legitimate edits to a wikipedia article. I would suggest taking a moment to re-read the comments in question and exercise a bit more discretion in handing-out disciplinary notices. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 150.131.85.143 (talk • contribs) .

response on their talk pageBenon 02:29, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Just to let you know a vandal impersonating you has committed vandalism with multiple accounts at Douglas Adams. It got reverted pretty quickly, though. Savidan 05:56, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yeah i was online when it happened its the anti-benon troll, thanks for alertng me tho :) Benon 17:27, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Valentine' day!

Happy Valentines Day!

User:Tawker wishes you a happy and fun Valentines Day

I award this Anti-Vandalism Barnstar to you for helping stop the squid bot. Tawker 07:15, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

for removal of the Squid vandal Tawker 06:57, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Letter

No problem! Let me know if you'd like me to give it a more thorough once-over before you send it--up to you. Chick Bowen 23:54, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marshall Strickland

Would you mind if I removed the speedy delete tag from this article? I've cleaned it up a bit, and I think he is a fairly notable person as a starter for a major Division 1 college basketball team, and a possible future NBA prospect. Thanks, --Alhutch 06:41, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

it apears to have been deleted alredy, Benon 06:42, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, looks like I'm moving a little slow tonight. thanks anyways.--Alhutch 06:44, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Squidward vandal

I sent you an email, in case you don't check it regularly, I thought that I would let you know here. It has what I think is the vandal's true name. I know that it is said that his name is known, but you may only have one of his aliases. -- Kjkolb 10:34, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, Benon, that's an excellent letter to the Chicago Library System you have there. Great job in keeping the vandals at bay. Being an admin (and hopefully lending some credence), I've signed it. Thanks! Regards, Bratsch e^talk 18:43, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

dont just thanksme, sevral pepole helped me imporve it, add litle bits of information etc because after all thats wha a wikis about!Benon 00:33, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

copyright G. Serembe

Hello mate!

I am cooperating with User:Millosh who has a written permission from Robert Elsie to use his works in Wikipedia User:Millosh/Permissions_from_Robert_Elsie.--Pjetër Bogdani III 18:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

response on their talk pageBenon 18:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank your very much Benon. I appreciate you are taking care of these articles.--Pjetër Bogdani III 18:55, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

N'r speedy tag

You tagged this Kosovar band with the {{nn-bio}}. The article said that they had an album out and were "foremost representatives". There's (purposefully) a large gap between what can be speedied and what passes WP:MUSIC, and in cases where there is any question it's safer to use {{prod}} or {{subst:afd}}. Thanks - brenneman ^{T}^{L} 02:47, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

With apologies for the impersonal AWB-ness of the message... Thanks for your support on my recent request for adminship. It passed at 91/1/0, and I hope I can continue to deserve the community's trust. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help you, and if I make a mistake be sure to tell me. My talk page is always open. (ESkog)^(Talk) 02:33, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Benon

Why are you removing my posts. They are real and make absolute sense. I don't like wasting my time.

If anything you are a cop and probably plead legionance to the Queen.

Freedom of Choice and Expression are non existant in this world.

Why are you not allowing me to SPEAK?????????????? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.148.83.231 (talk • contribs) .

response on their talk pageBenon 10:40, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

barnsatr

Too kind. C0pernicus 16:34, 28 February 2006 (UTC) your very welcome, wikipedia needs great pepole like you :)Benon 16:38, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting on my RfA, it passed with a final tally of 68/0/0 so I'm now an administrator. If there's anything I can do to help, you feel I've done something wrong, or there's just something you want to tell, don't hesitate to use my talk page. Thanks. - Bobet 10:42, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

pgkbot

I noticed your comment on IRC. Don't worry I am not here to scream at you (I am not that stupid).

I was wondering what about pgkbot do you like that computer lacks. After all pgkbot was based on computer and mostly does the same thing. I want to make my bot better. :)

PS pgkbot operates at #wikipedia-en-vandalism2 and only operates in #wikipedia-en-vandalism when my bot is offline (which shouldn't hapen much anymore since I have a working modem now)

--Cool Cat^Talk|@ 01:46, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

response on cool_cats pageBenon 18:34, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DO you know if any 1 here gets paid

do the people in admin here all volunteer....i think they shoud be paid gov subsides or E.U grant??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnny Lomax (talk • contribs)

no were all voluntersBenon 14:28, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain what you are doing with the entry on Sustainable National Income ???? The text that you put on my talk page is wholly unclear to me. Please restore the entry. Best regards, [[User:Colignatus|Colignatus]] 22:48, 3 March 2006 (UTC)Insert non-formatted text here

SNI

You wrote "the article the article you are trying to submit is a paper. to post on wikipedia would require almost a complete re-wrtie (im not critising your wrting its wirtten form a resarch point of view which isnt sutible)

we do howver have a sister project wikisorce which appears to be just what your looking for. the english version can be found here http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Main_Page Benon 14:42, 4 March 2006 (UTC) "

Can you please discuss this with me BEFORE you delete the page ???

It is exasperating what you are doing.

Are you an economist, do you understand what you are doing ???????????

Regards,

Colignatus 14:46, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic case closed

A final decision has been made in this case and it has been closed. --Tony Sidaway 14:51, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx for welcome me,

but i won't register. I'm from Germany and I don't even know english good enough to seek for terms in the Glossary. ;-)
Nevertheless I'll visit the english Wikipedia by time and correct some typos or something. :-) Maybe we'll see us again...
--Yoto (German Wikipedia), 83.135.82.35 16:51, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks always nice to hear form a fellow wikipediaBenon 17:16, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hell yeah, as I saw now you can speak german and polish, too. That's cool.

10:30 pm. So, jetzt sollte ich aber schlafen gehen. Dobranoc!

--Yoto (German Wikipedia), 83.135.82.35 21:32, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A friendly note...

You suck. Your whole operation sucks. This blows. :) joshbuddy^talk 21:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

:pBenon 21:44, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AMA

Hello, you are receiving this message because your name is on the list of members of the Association of Members' Advocates. There is a poll being held at Wikipedia talk:Association of Members' Advocates for approval of a proposal for the revitalisation of the association. You are eligible to vote and your vote and input are welcome.Gator (talk) 14:48, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

note to self votedBenon 01:33, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thanks for participating in my RfA. It passed with a final tally of 98/13/10, just two short of making WP:100. If you need my help with anything, don't hesitate to ask.

Naconkantari e|t||c|m 23:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hello

DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.212.144.198 (talk • contribs) .

Dear 66.212.144.198,

Thank you for telling us about the error, which I've fixed.

Note that Wikipedia is a wiki, which means that everyone can edit pages. Our articles are written by volunteers, and many started editing by fixing errors they found. If you're interested, you may edit any article by clicking the 'edit' label at the top of each page. Feel free to try it in the Sandbox.

If you're interested in editing Wikipedia, Wikipedia:Welcome is a good introduction. If you would like to know more about wikis, Wiki is our article on the subject.

// Pathoschild (_admin / ^talk) 01:56, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

oh pathoschild behave :p 12:27, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. I'm not sure why, but that guy just keeps going after me via my userpage... strange guy.

I'm not sure whether to erase the stuff above (because you restored them) so I'm gonna leave them alone... People do the randomest things. Anyways, thanks again. :) Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK! 00:59, 13 March 2006 (UTC) reply on their talk pageBenon 01:01, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your more than welcome, indeed i left those silly comments on my talk page to remind myself how weird some pepole are, especially as i just posted them a {{subst:welcome}} Benon 01:02, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Hehe... well, to quote "Toy Story," whoever did that is a sad, strangle little man... ;) Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK! 01:03, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

well hes blacklisted to the cvu so will be watched around the clock for vandalism so he wont get very far with a few dozen pepole watching himBenon

Requests for adminship

That sure was fast. Usually it is Alkivar who preempts me, was this a bot-assisted support? ;-) Best regards, Hall Monitor 22:48, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks!

Hi Benon! Thank you for supporting my RfA. It passed at 105/1/0, putting me in WP:100 - I'm delighted and surprised! I'm always happy to help out, so if you need anything, please drop me a line. Sorry about your glandular fever - I hope you feel better soon. ➨ ❝R E DVERS❞ 20:12, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

apology

Dear Benon,

My attack was immature and I'm sorry. I thought I was contributing something cool to the Deftones section on Wikipedia, and according to him, it's seemingly irrelevent. I thought I was free to add anything I wanted. The logo is completly relevent. It stands for Deftones revolution in music, compared to Nintendo Revolution. Other than that, I do my fair share of editing, and reading. —This unsigned comment was added by Glassjaw420wt (talk • contribs) .

reply on their talk pageBenon 00:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Licence information?

I need licence information to post that picture? Do I have to contact Nintendo and ask them for permisson to use (what looks like) there official logo? Or do I contact the Deftones, and ask them for permission to use there name in a logo? Maybe it's better I stop uploadeding homemade images, and stick to editeding irrlevent text... lol

Sorry :( —This unsigned comment was added by Glassjaw420wt (talk • contribs) .

reply on their talk page Benon 00:18, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism in the midst of a discussion!

Seriously, how are we supposed to DISCUSS on Talk-Pages, when my very arguments there are being vandalised. Still, some still dispute my arguments for being "false quotes", but when I back them up with FULL REFERENCES, my edit is repeatedly reverted. (Again, on the TALK-PAGE, the very place where we are supposed to discuss that). I'm waiting for an approval to revert again to my edits. Hope you'll provide me one. Here is a link to the questionable revert [2]. Thank you in advance. Zadil 00:38, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reply on their talk page Benon 02:25, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate very much your answer on my talk-page. May I raise a disturbing THREAT I received in the midst of the above discussion, where some user seems to reach "consensus" through personal intimidation and slander. Please look here. How should I respond? Thank you in advance. Zadil 02:56, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reply on their talk page Benon 03:08, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I admire your quick response. It meant a lot to me. Zadil 03:23, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reply on their talk page Benon 03:25, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are my friend!

Of course, you don't have to accept it. Just leave it on your talk page to rot, if you want. Sceptr e ^(Talk) 17:12, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Benon, if I may add, I find it very cute :) and honestly I wish you were my friend too! Zadil 19:27, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism again!

Hi benon! how are you? I hope you don't mind me seeking your advice again, regarding the same Talk Page. It Seems like some user has distressfully distorted my comments on a TALK PAGE. As you may observe, not only were my links REMOVED, but even the very REFERENCES - which was the all purpose of my comments - (given allegation of "fabrication" and "false quotes"), were to disappear, leaving the impression of my edit as another tedious long boring list of SOME ALLEGED quotes, which have been already cited just a few lines above. I find this revert as pure distortion, as he mysteriously "hided" the major lines in my comments.

Finally, the revert was applied without any notification, and I got it only in some miraculous way, which is again very disturbing. Would you be so kind look into the matter, sure I wish to revert that section again to my edit. Thanks in advance! A link is provided here Zadil 23:07, 27 March 2006 (UTC) reply on their talk page23:29, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Benon. My subsequent comment explained why I removed the links; they were to anti-Semitic sites violating Soncino's copyright - Wikipedia cannot support either anti-Semitism or copyright violation. Jayjg ^(talk) 23:56, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zadil knows exactly why the links were removed. He's been trying to POV push on that page for over a week now, against the objections of a half dozen other editors. Now he's trying to recruit allies on bogus grounds. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:04, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read my comment here. It certainly don't justify the removal of my links, which is the ONLY source to verify my comments. and by no means had it occurred to me, that this was the cause for that distortion. I hope you believe me, benon. Zadil 00:30, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your answer. I'll certainly try to abide by your advice. And again thank you very much. Zadil 02:33, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]