User talk:SpiritedMichelle

Welcome!

Hello, SpiritedMichelle, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 18:00, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. --SubSeven (talk) 03:23, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Hi, SpiritedMichelle. I understand you're a new editor, and your enthusiasm is beneficial and constructive. Welcome aboard. A couple of things: As per the guideline at WP:DATED, Wikipedia can't say things like "currently" or "recently" since such terms quickly become meaningless with time. Best to use such phrasing as "As of October 2013" or similar.

Also, I've noticed you enter a lot of raw URLs for citing. I ask you not do so but rather add properly cited footnotes, which include, at minimum, an article's title, date, newspaper/magazine name, and author (last name first). It's also good to add the date the article was accessed. You can find more information at WP:CITE, WP:FOOTNOTE and related pages.

Finally, I've noticed you sometimes add uncited claims in Reception sections, saying things like, "Many critics felt that this was the best episode of the season." Aside from Wikipedia needing exceptional sources for such superlative claims, you need to actually find and quote critics saying that particular thing.

I know this seems like a lot to take in, but like anything else, being a Wikipedia editor takes practice. The most important thing to keep in mind is that this is an encyclopedia. If newspaper are the first draft of history, an encyclopedia should be the final word: impeccably sourced concrete statements as neutral and accurate as humanly possible. Thanks again for joining us and Happy Wiki'ing! --Tenebrae (talk) 05:48, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, SpiritedMichelle. I've reverted or changed your edits to Thiago Soares, Marianela Núñez, Federico Bonelli, Lauren Cuthbertson, Sarah Lamb, Zenaida Yanowsky, and Maria Kochetkova that added the phrasing "As of November 2013..." to the lead sentences. See above, or send me a note, for an explanation.

Also, thank you for decapitalizing the title "principal" in those lead sentences. Dkreisst (talk) 03:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spirited Michelle. Thank you for the note, that was a fine use of user talk space. Often, users like to keep both sides of a conversation on one page. If you feel this way, post your response here on this page: I will be monitoring it for any response.

Your edits were perfect based on the information User:Tenebrae gave to you with the link to WP:DATED. I changed the sentences because I felt that, while it seems that dancers' hierarchical positions do change pretty regularly in the ballet world, the status of the dancers was permanent enough that a specific date did not need to be attached to the time the article was last updated. That is, when the intro sentence reading "X is a British ballet dancer dancing as a soloist with the Royal Ballet" is no longer true, due to a change of company, promotion, or change of profession, the sentence can simply be updated when that happens. I found the style page Wikipedia:As of useful when trying to figure this out.

If you feel that the article would not be updated quickly enough, feel free to change it back. If you have any other questions about wikipedia, please feel free to drop me a note. Also, consider checking out Wikipedia:WikiProject Ballet and remember to be bold! Dkreisst (talk) 06:55, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing just fine. Thank you for your work and for your patience in dealing with wikipedia policy. Let me know if you have any more questions. Dkreisst (talk) 00:57, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to San Francisco Ballet may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

], is notable for being the only uniquely San Francisco ''Nutcracker''. It features sets (including “a backdrop of San Francisco’s Victorian houses (known as “painted ladies”)<ref name="

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Minor Edits

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.

Hello!

Hi! Thanks for adding the visitor numbers info to the British Museum page. Sorry to keep on about this (as it's been mentioned on your talk page before), but that wasn't a minor edit (as you actually added information and a reference). You do a lot of grammar corrections, which is great, and are classed as minor edits, even though they're important. But when you're adding info or categories or references, then they're not minor.

Anyway, any more info you've got for the British Museum would be great - given how important it is it'd be good to improve the page!

Thanks and all the best, GPRutter (talk) 09:05, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Thanks! Yes, that's fine to respond there, or here - people tend to check back when they've left a message (on your contributions list it shows whether your edit is the current last edit or not). No problem, and do ask if there's anything that you're not sure about (although I've just re-started editing, so they've made some changes!). GPRutter (talk) 20:36, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Charming Charlie may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

<ref>{{cite web|title=Charming Charlie|url=http://stores.charmingcharlie.com/#fbid=KPZIGtb2zvh <ref

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:41, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB

Hi SpiritedMichelle, please note that I have reverted your addition of a DOB to Jess Weixler as you used IMDB as the source of the information. Per long standing consensus, IMDB is not a reliable source for biographical statistics in biography articles. You can read more about the use of IMDB here, here, and here.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 18:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ModCloth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Accessories (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 2 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Sustainable landscape architecture page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amsale Aberra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Couture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Event cinema, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Current affairs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Maria Doyle Kennedy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|Episodes (3 episodes0

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC The Winter's Tale (ballet) was accepted

The Winter's Tale (ballet), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e decker ^talk 23:59, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Winter's Tale (ballet), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Watson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Subsections for Critical reception sections

Hello, SpiritedMichelle. See here and here for why I undid your format of the Critical reception section at the Orphan Black article. Per MOS:PARAGRAPHS, "Short paragraphs and single sentences generally do not warrant their own subheading." Flyer22 (talk) 01:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Judd Hirsch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forever (TV series). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sara Mearns, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swan Lake (ballet). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited La Mamounia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Five-star. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Svetlana Zakharova (dancer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sleeping Beauty. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interview for The Signpost

This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Orphanage

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Orphanage for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (speak) @ 18:30, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yonghoon Lee has been accepted

Yonghoon Lee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:35, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Javier Camarena has been accepted

Javier Camarena, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

George Edward C – Talk – Contributions 13:25, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crown Princess (ship), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whittier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

deOrphaning script

Hello everyone! I was just working on responding to a couple bug reports for a script that I worked up as part of a request from this project, and I noticed that only a couple people (who weren't even on this mailing list) are actually using the script. A little history on the script: In March of 2014, Jim Cartar came to my user talk page and said he needed some help in acquiring a script for a backlog drive that he was working on that could keep track of and score deOrphanings for a scored backlog drive. I took that request to the project's talk page (BackLog Drive "DO" (De-Orphaning) script proposal) and there was near unanimous support for this. I thought about the proposal and decided the best way to do it was to build a new script (which is still no where near as comprehensive as Manishearth's OrphanTabs) and build into it a mechanism that will make BLD scoring easy.

What I'm wondering at this point is, since there appears to be only two people using the script, should I continue to develop this script with a goal of using it for scoring BLDs or just debug the existing script and leave it at that. Thanks for any replies or comments.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 14:10, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mezzo-soprano may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* Ariadne, ''[[The Minotaur (opera)|The Minotaur]]'' )[[Harrison Birtwistle|Birtwistle]])

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:56, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Vickers

Hi there, was it your intention to remove sources and content that was properly cited or was this an accident?4meter4 (talk) 02:31, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No I did not.SpiritedMichelle (talk) 03:41, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnamese embroidery

Hello, SpiritedMichelle. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Vietnamese embroidery at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:00, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Persian embroidery

Hello, SpiritedMichelle. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Persian embroidery at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 22:34, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ten Thousand Villages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Products. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Evin Prison

Hello, SpiritedMichelle. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Evin Prison at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! I've done all but the "Prisoners" section, which needs severe pruning which is outside the realm of copy-editing. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:56, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TAFI

Could you please take a look at TAFI. I have nominated both Gustaf and Bill Skarsgård. Could need some more input. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 06:13, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please, with any work you do

…at the Gilsig article, assist us on preventing the continued addition of material without sources. See ALL CAPS messages appearing in the article in edit mode. Le Prof [Leprof_7272] 73.210.154.39 (talk) 17:48, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stella Abrera (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stella Abrera and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 01:57, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! SpiritedMichelle, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 01:57, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fashion in the United States

Hello, SpiritedMichelle. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Fashion in the United States at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Note that I have not worked on the article's sourcing as per your request, which is not within the Guild's stated remit. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:22, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: "AKA Ladies Night" has been accepted

"AKA Ladies Night", which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 05:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, SpiritedMichelle! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Fiddle Faddle 21:38, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I redirected it as I don't believe it merits its own article. Firstly, all the info in the page is already on the Jessica Jones page. Secondly, its the only episode that has its own page (so far). Its also an orphan so no other pages on WP reach it. So my decision to create a redirect. Just my 2c Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ana María Martínez

Hello, SpiritedMichelle. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Ana María Martínez at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the c/e, I removed the uncited career section, per BLP; please ensure any further material you add there is properly cited from reliable, third-party sources. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:58, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sonja Sohn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Originals. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, I'm Brianhe. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Belstaff seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 23:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Stella Abrera concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Stella Abrera, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SpiritedMichelle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stella Abrera

Hello, SpiritedMichelle. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Stella Abrera".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 01:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anna Valentine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luxury. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prabal Gurung, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nepalese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SpiritedMichelle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Michal Negrin concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Michal Negrin, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Michal Negrin

Hello, SpiritedMichelle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Michal Negrin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Juana Matias, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attorney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SpiritedMichelle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Women in the United States House of Representatives (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Pls note stand alone list need independent reliable sources to support the content. Group sources are acceptable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Women in the United States House of Representatives and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Women in the United States House of Representatives, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:17, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Women in the United States House of Representatives into Draft:List of Women in the United States House of Representatives. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:01, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List current female members in the United States House of Representatives

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List current female members in the United States House of Representatives requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Daiyusha (talk) 09:45, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please solve the matter out of Goodwill

I am falsely accused of getting paid by the wiki editor... I hereby state that i have no personal relationship with the celebrity. I am an honorable journalist who saw something wrong and went ahead to correct the mistakes. Kindly observe that all sources are credible n verified. Yet the template is giving a wrong message about our favorite celebrity and me when im just an honest editor. I seek clean up of the templates as i was being a honest journalist. VeronicaJoseph5 (talk) 02:25, 14 April 2019 (UTC) VeronicaJoseph5 (talk) 02:26, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Women in the United States House of Representatives has been accepted

List of Women in the United States House of Representatives, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 06:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Park furniture

I don't know if you realized this, but the explanation for the nomination is missing from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Park furniture. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect renaming of articles

Please stop renaming articles while ignoring its content. The content of the article should come first, not its resembles with the titles of the other articles. When you title an article "Dance in Ukraine", the implication is that the article will describe the dances of different nationalities within the same country, which are clearly more than just Ukrainians, there are quite enough minority groups, which also have their own dances. However, the article instead describes the national dance of Ukrainians as an ethnic group and also covers its performance outside of the country in other countries. It turns out that the title of the article does not correspond to the content at all, whereas the previous one was correct. And that's not to say that renaming the articles on traditional dance to general dance of the country is also wrong. Especially given that the article continues to be linked with an article in another language describing only traditional dances. Solidest (talk) 16:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Book of the Month, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Little Fires Everywhere. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rachael Flatt

What Do I See On The Seat Of This Costume,Worn By Rachael Flatt?:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/FlattEx1a.jpg Jackjohnson52183 (talk) 16:39, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Review your Stardust edit

You recently removed from the Stardust article the only non-lede mention of the fact that the novel was adapted into a film. Given that it was a major feature film with big-name stars, frankly it deserved more space in "adaptations" than the one sentence it had. A (sourced) sentence about the film remains in the introduction, and given that the introduction is supposed to be a summary of the body of the article, it should appear in that adaptation section as well.

I have retired from article editing, or I'd reintroduce the material myself. I do request that you review your edit and consider reinsertion. --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:00, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request edit assistance for Daphne Guinness article

Hi. I see you’re a member of the Fashion WikiProject - I’ve made some proposals to update the article about Daphne Guinness, posted here Talk:Daphne Guinness#Request Edits for February 2023. Because I have a conflict of interest, I can’t do these edits myself. Could you have time to look at these and consider? Thank you very much.YhSA99b3tTnCnLdr (talk) 19:11, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Fashion#Photos_from_fashion_exhibit

That's from 2019 and I only see it now, new to that wikiproject. Since you took the photos then you're owner of these photos and they're welcome at commons. If an event is recent enough, see also n:Wikinews:Photo essay. Does this help? Have you attended an event and photographed it recently? Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 23:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Drew Meekins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny O'Shea.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]