User talk:Spiceislandseabird

Welcome

Hello, Spiceislandseabird, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:55, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

April 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Sacred Idol has been reverted.
Your edit here to The Sacred Idol was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.discogs.com/Les-Baxter-The-Fruit-Of-Dreams/release/615725) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:46, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Knifepoint Horror

Hello Spiceislandseabird, the WP:PODCASTING WikiProject has nominated Knifepoint Horror as the Collaboration of the Month and Richard Nevell has noted that you've already started a draft for the podcast at your sandbox. Would you mind if I merged the content on your sandbox into draftspace so that we can work on getting it published? TipsyElephant (talk) 17:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, that's fine! Spiceislandseabird (talk) 18:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Change The Genres For Beginnings From Chicago RIGHT NOW! 2601:1C1:4202:2130:4AB:EFF4:D1E0:C370 (talk) 23:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: When Am I Gonna Lose You has been accepted

When Am I Gonna Lose You, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 08:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ports of Pleasure has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ports of Pleasure. Thanks! Rusalkii (talk) 05:41, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean because IMDb isn't cited anywhere on this page? Spiceislandseabird (talk) 17:00, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Midnight on the Cliffs (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NALBUM, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. Blog sites and Discogs are not reliable or acceptable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Midnight on the Cliffs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Midnight on the Cliffs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:15, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spiceislandseabird! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 08:15, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ports of Pleasure (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ports of Pleasure and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ports of Pleasure, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:24, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Church of Scars, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ss112 07:14, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beach Too Sandy, Water Too Wet (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Notability per WP:GNG requires significant coverage in multiple independent, reliable, secondary sources. None of the sources cited meets these criteria. --

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beach Too Sandy, Water Too Wet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Beach Too Sandy, Water Too Wet, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:53, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Midnight on the Cliffs

Hello, Spiceislandseabird. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Midnight on the Cliffs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ports of Pleasure

Hello, Spiceislandseabird. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ports of Pleasure, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Beach Too Sandy, Water Too Wet

Hello, Spiceislandseabird. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beach Too Sandy, Water Too Wet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proper way to add genres

This is not a biggie, but you may want to read the template documentation about the proper way to add lists of genres. Have fun editing! --Muhandes (talk) 17:46, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ports of Pleasure

Hello, Spiceislandseabird. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ports of Pleasure".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:25, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Musical genres

Please watch your conflation of descriptive words such as "minimal" with specific musical genres such as Minimal music. The media can describe a piece of music as "rocking" without it being rock music, and they can describe a song as "experimental" without it being the musical genre experimental music. They might say some music is "hard" without meaning it is hard rock. The English words are too flexible for you to connect them straight from a description to a musical genre. You have to know what the genre is about before you list it in the infobox. Binksternet (talk) 04:25, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just came here to basically say the same thing. Referring to Smells Like Teen Spirit as "pop-punk" because someone, somewhere used both of the words pop and punk to describe the song was particularly egregious. In general, I think it is safe to say that adding genres to a music article that has been on Wikipedia for many years is almost always going to make WP worse. If a genre is valid, someone has almost certainly already added it. If you are adding an additional genre because you found some recent description of a 40-year old song as maybe, possibly being in a not-yet-listed genre, it's almost certainly an outlier description and contrary to a long-established critical consensus. CAVincent (talk) 06:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hung Up, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electro. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please stop. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Hello, Dolly! (song), you may be blocked from editing. Make certain that the source is talking about the song genre, not the artist genre. Binksternet (talk) 07:45, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the message. I am getting quite loose with my interpretation of the genre of a song. I am grateful you issued a warning and didn't block me from editing outright. Editing Wikipedia is just fun to me, for some reason. I know we have had some run-ins in the past few months with my editing but I promise to step up my game and only add a genre (from a reliable source!) if the article explicitly defines it as such. Spiceislandseabird (talk) 13:41, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mary's Boy Child, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calypso.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Rocker (song)

Hi, can you provide a quote from the book you referenced for this song being power pop? It seems odd that a general music book would mention such an obscure song, let alone with an inappropriate genre. Thanks, Bretonbanquet (talk) 11:37, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the quote. Spiceislandseabird (talk) 13:10, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Seems bizarre. This is the problem when genres with one source get added. If you found another one for power pop, I'd be stunned. You could probably find several single-reference genres for that song (heavy metal, certainly), which highlights the problems with adding genres. Bretonbanquet (talk) 14:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't really suggesting you take it off - you certainly hadn't done anything wrong. I was questioning the opinion of the author really. You can restore it if you'd like. Bretonbanquet (talk) 14:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Who Are You (The Who song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Make Believe (Toto song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Love Action (I Believe in Love)

added a link pointing to Electro

The Sound of the Crowd

added a link pointing to Electro

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]