User talk:Spaceman1978

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:12, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Hot in the Shade, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 03:31, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy Thayer is credited on the actual album for co-writing those two songs he played on. Just look at the record. I wrote that under additional personal because he did co-write those songs, I don't need to provide a source because that's what it says on the actual album.

For the people who don't have the album, you must source your claims. Mlpearc (open channel) 03:43, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Regarding a prospective 2015 album of Ace Frehley, it is just too far to speculate in a discography section for an album in 2015 by dubbing it TBA. Usually we do this only if the new album will be within weeks and we are not certain of a title. Or else our discographies will be inundated by hundred and hundreds of such TBA albums. Wikipedia not a crystal ball. But what you could do is to add some text within the article itself about this and attch the reference that you provided. You may even add some known details about being a cover version or collaborations with other artist. werldwayd (talk) 16:27, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Peter Criss 2017.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Peter Criss 2017.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:52, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can only claim fair use on images that are not replaceable. Since Peter Criss is still alive, it is theoretically possible to obtain new images of him, and therefore it violates fair-use rules to use a copyrighted image of him. Your rationale ("there's only a limited amount of pictures from his final show and there's not many current pictures of Peter at all.") is not valid, because the absence of images does not preclude the possibility of obtaining new images. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Ace Frehley 2017.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ace Frehley 2017.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:16, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Peter Criss‎, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Please make sure to stay logged-in, as well. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 01:58, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your posts

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Peter Criss, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:13, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Armageddon (1998 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:39, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles are not considered reliable sources per WP:CIRCULAR. However, there may be appropriate sources in the article you linked to that could be used to cite the information you wish to add. DonIago (talk) 17:18, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dynasty (Kiss album); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 00:53, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits were fine but I had to revert them so I could revert the random person editing them, they changed all the personal stuff on the album, with NO sources, they did this on several pages, there is no editing war, someone just went on Wikipedia without an account messing things up, it isn’t about how I think it should be, everything on the article had been that way for several years & had been proven with sources. Spaceman1978 (talk) 06:19, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I won’t revert your edits again, What I wanted to edit was corrected manually now, sorry I reverted your edits. Spaceman1978 (talk) 06:26, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]