User talk:Sour camdy

March 2014

Hello, I'm Tentinator. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Charlie's Angels because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Tentinator 14:05, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hidden category redirect category category name sortkey category people Einstein albert defautsort page name defautsort new York // incategory suension bridges or incateory bridges in new York city category tree name/category tree category tree mode= pages name category tree,,,& cmcontinue = page nnnn/ title

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Charlie's Angels, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Davejohnsan (talk) 23:40, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Charlie's Angels. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. It looks like you're simply trying out editing features - but please don't do this any more to a live article, even temporarily. Please take note of the comments above and use the sandbox. : Noyster (talk), 19:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Sour camdy/sandbox (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sour camdy/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 13:11, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at User:Sour camdy/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 23:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Spelling/Goldberg Productions

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Spelling/Goldberg Productions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:11, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --sour camdy 12:24, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

delete charlies angles tv show for good because I can deleted it myself

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --sour camdy 12:29, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

delete chariles angles tv show because I cant delete it my self delete it for good very soon please thanks

April 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Charlie's Angels, you may be blocked from editing. kelapstick^(bainuu) 12:57, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. kelapstick^(bainuu) 13:11, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]