User talk:Snubbiesluver15

Welcome!

Hello, Snubbiesluver15, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Guettarda 19:21, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Doubt songs

I've removed the information you added to Hey You and Doghouse; these songs are non-notable, and there is very little information available about them. I've also speedy deleted Happy Now?, which has been deleted several times before (deletion log) based on a decision at Articles for deletion. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to leave them on my talk page. ShadowHalo 19:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your change to the No Doubt article. Information about work on an upcoming albums is already included in the main article text. It would be reasonable to add the untitled album in the discography section if there were a year, but there needs to be a source saying that it will be in 2008. ShadowHalo 19:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Gwen stefani early winter cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gwen stefani early winter cover.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:08, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Gwendolln.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gwendolln.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:08, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:2813_3335_Stefani-Gwen-04-4x.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:2813_3335_Stefani-Gwen-04-4x.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 15:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Killers_band_shot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Killers_band_shot.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:No-doubt.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:No-doubt.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yummy (Gwen Stefani song)

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Yummy (Gwen Stefani song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ShadowHalo 22:08, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Future singles

Your recent contribution(s) to Wikipedia are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at How to cite sources. Thanks! ShadowHalo 18:10, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have already told you that you need to provide reliable sources when adding future singles, as you did at Gwen Stefani. Do not add predictions on future singles without citing reliable sources. ShadowHalo 09:34, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gwen Stefani

I've reverted this edit you made to Gwen Stefani. The article Serious (Gwen Stefani song) appears to be a hoax and will likely be deleted in a few days. If you have input regarding the article and it's validity, please contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serious (Gwen Stefani song). ShadowHalo 09:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:StefaniGwen NK003 400.jpg

We're sorry, but this image has been deleted. It failed to assert fair use and its source was not included. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 14:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same with Image:Gwen-stefani-will-be-a-no-show-at-vmas-DjO.jpg; please read Wikipedia policy on fair-use images. Only free-to-use images can identify a living, public person. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 14:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Hilaryduff07.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hilaryduff07.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:07, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hilaryduff07.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Hilaryduff07.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Hilaryduff07.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Alex43223^{T | C | E} 04:52, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alex43223^{T | C | E} 04:52, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Nellyfurtadoloose.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nellyfurtadoloose.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:BeyonceGreenLight.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BeyonceGreenLight.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Rihanna.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rihanna.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

4 in the Morning

Please stop. Continuing to add unsourced or original content, as you did to 4 in the Morning, is considered vandalism and may result in a block. ShadowHalo 03:48, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 4 in the Morning, you will be blocked from editing. ShadowHalo 01:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:4InTheMorning.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:4InTheMorning.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

images

Is there some part of adding tags or sources you are haveing problems with?Geni 09:31, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:2CATBQL6Q.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:2CATBQL6Q.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:44, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gwen Stefani

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gwen Stefani, you will be blocked from editing. ShadowHalo 17:46, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Gwen Stefani. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. ShadowHalo 00:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Album (No Doubt album)

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Untitled Album (No Doubt album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ShadowHalo 18:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

4 in the Morning

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to 4 in the Morning. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. ShadowHalo 19:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 4 in the Morning, you will be blocked from editing. As you have been told before (see all the above warnings), you need to cite your sources. ShadowHalo 19:48, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. ShadowHalo 16:28, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:E324 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:E324 2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gwen Stefani and {{Gwen Stefani}}

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. ShadowHalo 20:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:51PEOdQvimL SS500 .jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:51PEOdQvimL SS500 .jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:05, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ashley-tisdale-post-nose-job-07.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashley-tisdale-post-nose-job-07.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cat among the Pigeons (Cat Royal)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cat among the Pigeons (Cat Royal), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Cat among the Pigeons (Cat Royal). Basketball one ten 18:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Den Of Thieves (Cat Royal)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Den Of Thieves (Cat Royal), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Den Of Thieves (Cat Royal). Basketball one ten 18:08, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Den Of Thieves (Cat Royal)

A tag has been placed on Den Of Thieves (Cat Royal) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:08, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Cat among the Pigeons (Cat Royal)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Cat among the Pigeons (Cat Royal), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat among the Pigeons (Cat Royal). Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 19:52, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:51z1yym8wQL AA280 .jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:51z1yym8wQL AA280 .jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:13, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Buzz! The Disney Quiz

I have nominated Buzz! The Disney Quiz, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buzz! The Disney Quiz. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. αѕєηιηє ^t/_c 14:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Moomania

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Moomania, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 17:59, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Moomania

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Moomania. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 18:07, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Speak Now. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yvesnimmo (talk) 15:53, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Molly Moon, Micky Minus and the Mind Machine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Molly Moon, Micky Minus and the Mind Machine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Moon, Micky Minus and the Mind Machine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Mr X 13:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]